Gender differences in psychological status of infertile couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fahimeh Khorasani, Elnaz Iranifard, Robab Latifnejad Roudsari
{"title":"Gender differences in psychological status of infertile couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Fahimeh Khorasani, Elnaz Iranifard, Robab Latifnejad Roudsari","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-23314-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Infertility affects approximately millions of individuals of reproductive age worldwide and can lead to significant psychological consequences, dramatically impacting the lives of those involved. This systematic review aimed to measure the gender differences in psychological status experienced by infertile couples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of observational studies in English was conducted across several databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, with no time restrictions applied until September 2024. The review adheres to the MOOSE Guidelines and is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024541801). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2 was used to estimate mean difference and 95% CI and prediction interval by the random-effects model. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on the study region, stage of treatment, and measurement tools. Also, sensitivity analysis was performed using the one-study removed method. To assess publication bias, the Funnel plot and Egger's test were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 748 documents from the initial search, 27 studies, involving 10,083 infertile men and women, were included in this systematic review, of which 21 studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was a significant difference between the mean scores of infertile women and men in all aspects of psychological status (Std diff in Mean: 0.31, CI 95% [0.23-0.39]; p-value ≤ 0.001). Also, there were significant differences in mean levels of anxiety (0.42, CI 95% [0.34-0.50], p-value ≤ 0.001), depression (0.39, CI 95% [0.29-0.49], p-value ≤ 0.001), stress (0.34, CI 95% [0.23-0.45], p-value ≤ 0.001), and self-efficacy (-0.54, CI 95% [-0.69-0.39], p-value ≤ 0.001) between infertile women and men. The difference in mean levels of self-esteem and sexual satisfaction did not differ significantly between infertile women and men.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering the differences in psychological status between infertile women and men, paying attention to gender differences is crucial when formulating policies and planning strategies for implementing solutions. It is important to consider how men and women may be affected differently when designing programs to address their infertility issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"2131"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12144790/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23314-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Infertility affects approximately millions of individuals of reproductive age worldwide and can lead to significant psychological consequences, dramatically impacting the lives of those involved. This systematic review aimed to measure the gender differences in psychological status experienced by infertile couples.

Methods: A comprehensive search of observational studies in English was conducted across several databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, with no time restrictions applied until September 2024. The review adheres to the MOOSE Guidelines and is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024541801). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2 was used to estimate mean difference and 95% CI and prediction interval by the random-effects model. A subgroup analysis was conducted based on the study region, stage of treatment, and measurement tools. Also, sensitivity analysis was performed using the one-study removed method. To assess publication bias, the Funnel plot and Egger's test were used.

Results: Out of 748 documents from the initial search, 27 studies, involving 10,083 infertile men and women, were included in this systematic review, of which 21 studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was a significant difference between the mean scores of infertile women and men in all aspects of psychological status (Std diff in Mean: 0.31, CI 95% [0.23-0.39]; p-value ≤ 0.001). Also, there were significant differences in mean levels of anxiety (0.42, CI 95% [0.34-0.50], p-value ≤ 0.001), depression (0.39, CI 95% [0.29-0.49], p-value ≤ 0.001), stress (0.34, CI 95% [0.23-0.45], p-value ≤ 0.001), and self-efficacy (-0.54, CI 95% [-0.69-0.39], p-value ≤ 0.001) between infertile women and men. The difference in mean levels of self-esteem and sexual satisfaction did not differ significantly between infertile women and men.

Conclusion: Considering the differences in psychological status between infertile women and men, paying attention to gender differences is crucial when formulating policies and planning strategies for implementing solutions. It is important to consider how men and women may be affected differently when designing programs to address their infertility issues.

不孕夫妇心理状态的性别差异:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景和目的:不孕症影响着全世界大约数百万的育龄人群,并可能导致严重的心理后果,极大地影响着这些人的生活。本系统综述旨在衡量不孕夫妇心理状态的性别差异。方法:在PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和Scopus等多个数据库中全面检索英文观察性研究,截止日期为2024年9月,没有时间限制。该审查遵循MOOSE指南,并已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024541801)。综合Meta-Analysis Version 2采用随机效应模型估计平均差、95% CI和预测区间。根据研究区域、治疗阶段和测量工具进行亚组分析。同时,采用单项研究剔除法进行敏感性分析。为了评估发表偏倚,采用漏斗图和Egger检验。结果:在最初检索的748份文献中,有27项研究,涉及10083名不育男性和女性,被纳入该系统综述,其中21项研究被纳入荟萃分析。不孕症男女在心理状态各方面的平均得分差异有统计学意义(Std差:0.31,CI 95% [0.23-0.39];p值≤0.001)。此外,不孕男女在焦虑(0.42,CI 95% [0.34-0.50], p值≤0.001)、抑郁(0.39,CI 95% [0.29-0.49], p值≤0.001)、压力(0.34,CI 95% [0.23-0.45], p值≤0.001)和自我效能(-0.54,CI 95% [-0.69-0.39], p值≤0.001)的平均水平也存在显著差异。在自尊和性满足的平均水平上,不育女性和男性之间没有显著差异。结论:考虑到不孕不育男女心理状况的差异,在制定政策和规划实施方案的策略时,关注性别差异至关重要。在设计解决不孕问题的方案时,考虑男性和女性可能受到的不同影响是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信