Community partnership lessons learned from the You & Me: Test and Treat study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Emily M D'Agostino, Isa Granados, Princess Abbott-Grimes, Camille Brown-Lowery, Allyn Damman, Tigidankay Fadika, Mark Ward, Mia Cooper, Jeannine Sato, Janet Kasper, Tatiana Vizcaino, Wes Gray, Allison Swart, Amanda Sparling, Claudia G Corchado, Christoph P Hornik
{"title":"Community partnership lessons learned from the You & Me: Test and Treat study.","authors":"Emily M D'Agostino, Isa Granados, Princess Abbott-Grimes, Camille Brown-Lowery, Allyn Damman, Tigidankay Fadika, Mark Ward, Mia Cooper, Jeannine Sato, Janet Kasper, Tatiana Vizcaino, Wes Gray, Allison Swart, Amanda Sparling, Claudia G Corchado, Christoph P Hornik","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-23216-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community-engaged research relies on the strength of partnerships to achieve and sustain shared goals. The You & Me: Test and Treat (YMTT) project aimed to promote COVID-19 test and treatment access using a tiered model of community engagement and a codeveloped toolkit to foster robust community-academic partnerships. This study assesses the YMTT project's strengths, identifies partnership lessons learned, and evaluates the toolkit's utility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analysis of the YMTT project was conducted from May 2024 to October 2024. A mixed-methods approach was used. Participants represented anchor, local community, and academic partners from YMTT. A validated survey assessed partnership dynamics, including communication, collaboration, and dissemination. The Community Engagement Toolkit Survey and focus groups explored the YMTT partnership strengths and toolkit's utility, while a collaborative exercise documented reflections on partnership processes. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two participants (4 anchor partners, 10 community partners, and 8 academic partners) completed surveys, focus groups, and collaborative exercises. Survey results highlighted strong communication practices (88% agreement on effective, ongoing communication) and mutual respect (88% agreement on valued contributions). Key challenges and themes from the collaborative exercise included trust building, sustainability planning, equitable resource sharing, and accessibility of tools for diverse community partners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that strong communication and mutual respect underpin effective partnerships but highlighted the need for improved sustainability planning and accessible tools. These findings provide a roadmap for enhancing community-academic partnerships and addressing health disparities through equitable, sustainable collaboration.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05589376. Registered 21 October 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"2115"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12143049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23216-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community-engaged research relies on the strength of partnerships to achieve and sustain shared goals. The You & Me: Test and Treat (YMTT) project aimed to promote COVID-19 test and treatment access using a tiered model of community engagement and a codeveloped toolkit to foster robust community-academic partnerships. This study assesses the YMTT project's strengths, identifies partnership lessons learned, and evaluates the toolkit's utility.

Methods: This analysis of the YMTT project was conducted from May 2024 to October 2024. A mixed-methods approach was used. Participants represented anchor, local community, and academic partners from YMTT. A validated survey assessed partnership dynamics, including communication, collaboration, and dissemination. The Community Engagement Toolkit Survey and focus groups explored the YMTT partnership strengths and toolkit's utility, while a collaborative exercise documented reflections on partnership processes. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

Results: Twenty-two participants (4 anchor partners, 10 community partners, and 8 academic partners) completed surveys, focus groups, and collaborative exercises. Survey results highlighted strong communication practices (88% agreement on effective, ongoing communication) and mutual respect (88% agreement on valued contributions). Key challenges and themes from the collaborative exercise included trust building, sustainability planning, equitable resource sharing, and accessibility of tools for diverse community partners.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that strong communication and mutual respect underpin effective partnerships but highlighted the need for improved sustainability planning and accessible tools. These findings provide a roadmap for enhancing community-academic partnerships and addressing health disparities through equitable, sustainable collaboration.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05589376. Registered 21 October 2022.

从“你和我:测试和治疗”研究中学到的社区合作经验。
背景:社区参与的研究依赖于伙伴关系的力量来实现和维持共同目标。“你和我:检测和治疗”(YMTT)项目旨在通过社区参与的分层模式和共同开发的工具包促进COVID-19检测和治疗的可及性,以建立强有力的社区-学术伙伴关系。本研究评估了YMTT项目的优势,确定了合作伙伴关系的经验教训,并评估了工具包的实用性。方法:对2024年5月至2024年10月的YMTT项目进行分析。采用混合方法。参加者代表了主持人、当地社区和YMTT的学术合作伙伴。一项有效的调查评估了伙伴关系的动态,包括沟通、协作和传播。社区参与工具包调查和焦点小组探讨了YMTT伙伴关系的优势和工具包的效用,而协作练习则记录了对伙伴关系过程的反思。数据分析采用描述性统计和专题分析。结果:22名参与者(4名锚定合作伙伴、10名社区合作伙伴和8名学术合作伙伴)完成了调查、焦点小组和协作练习。调查结果强调了强有力的沟通实践(88%的人同意有效、持续的沟通)和相互尊重(88%的人同意有价值的贡献)。合作演习的主要挑战和主题包括建立信任、可持续发展规划、公平的资源共享以及不同社区合作伙伴的工具可及性。结论:本研究表明,强有力的沟通和相互尊重是有效伙伴关系的基础,但也强调了改进可持续性规划和获取工具的必要性。这些研究结果为加强社区学术伙伴关系和通过公平、可持续的合作解决卫生差距问题提供了路线图。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05589376。注册于2022年10月21日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信