A cross-sectional study on household disaster preparedness in China and analysis of its influencing factors.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Xiangju Yin, Yongli Yu, Yifan Kang, Dengyun Hu, Yibo Wu
{"title":"A cross-sectional study on household disaster preparedness in China and analysis of its influencing factors.","authors":"Xiangju Yin, Yongli Yu, Yifan Kang, Dengyun Hu, Yibo Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-23281-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In disaster response, household disaster preparedness is pivotal to risk avoidance, self-rescue, and mutual aid capabilities. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the status and determinants of household disaster preparedness among Chinese residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted through cluster sampling of residents across 22 provinces, 4 municipalities, and 5 autonomous regions in China. Statistical analysis and model construction were conducted on data collected from 9,966 respondents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed widespread inadequacies in the preparation of multiple types of household emergency supplies. Significant disparities in emergency supplies stockpiling were observed across groups stratified by gender, residence type, monthly household income per capita, educational attainment and employment status. Additionally, there were also certain differences between different regions. Further analysis through a sequential mediation model revealed that household disaster preparedness was closely associated with family members' personality traits, self-efficacy and perceived social support. Within the Big Five personality framework, extraversion, conscientiousness and openness significantly promoted household preparedness behaviors, whereas neuroticism negative correlation with preparedness levels. Self-efficacy and perceived social support were significant mediating factors in household disaster preparedness among residents with distinct personality traits, exhibiting varied mechanisms of influence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides scientific evidence and directional guidance for formulating comprehensive strategies to enhance household disaster preparedness levels among Chinese residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"2118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23281-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In disaster response, household disaster preparedness is pivotal to risk avoidance, self-rescue, and mutual aid capabilities. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the status and determinants of household disaster preparedness among Chinese residents.

Methods: The study was conducted through cluster sampling of residents across 22 provinces, 4 municipalities, and 5 autonomous regions in China. Statistical analysis and model construction were conducted on data collected from 9,966 respondents.

Results: The findings revealed widespread inadequacies in the preparation of multiple types of household emergency supplies. Significant disparities in emergency supplies stockpiling were observed across groups stratified by gender, residence type, monthly household income per capita, educational attainment and employment status. Additionally, there were also certain differences between different regions. Further analysis through a sequential mediation model revealed that household disaster preparedness was closely associated with family members' personality traits, self-efficacy and perceived social support. Within the Big Five personality framework, extraversion, conscientiousness and openness significantly promoted household preparedness behaviors, whereas neuroticism negative correlation with preparedness levels. Self-efficacy and perceived social support were significant mediating factors in household disaster preparedness among residents with distinct personality traits, exhibiting varied mechanisms of influence.

Conclusions: This study provides scientific evidence and directional guidance for formulating comprehensive strategies to enhance household disaster preparedness levels among Chinese residents.

中国家庭备灾的横截面研究及其影响因素分析。
背景:在灾害应对中,家庭备灾对风险规避、自救和互助能力至关重要。本研究旨在全面分析我国居民家庭备灾的现状及其影响因素。方法:采用整群抽样的方法,对中国22个省、4个直辖市、5个自治区的居民进行调查。对9966名被调查者的数据进行统计分析和模型构建。结果:调查结果显示,在准备多种家庭应急用品方面普遍存在不足。按性别、居住类型、人均家庭月收入、受教育程度和就业状况分层的群体在应急用品储备方面存在显著差异。此外,不同地区之间也存在一定的差异。通过序贯中介模型进一步分析发现,家庭备灾与家庭成员人格特质、自我效能感和感知社会支持密切相关。在大五人格框架下,外向性、严谨性和开放性显著促进家庭准备行为,而神经质与准备水平负相关。自我效能感和感知社会支持是不同人格特质居民家庭备灾的显著中介因素,表现出不同的影响机制。结论:本研究为制定提高我国居民家庭备灾水平的综合对策提供了科学依据和方向性指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信