Validation of the Thai version of the modified social functioning scale (SFS) for individuals with schizophrenia.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Warut Aunjitsakul, Kanthee Anantapong, Aimorn Jiraphan, Teerapat Teetharatkul, Katti Sathaporn, Napakkawat Buathong, Pakawat Wiwattanaworaset
{"title":"Validation of the Thai version of the modified social functioning scale (SFS) for individuals with schizophrenia.","authors":"Warut Aunjitsakul, Kanthee Anantapong, Aimorn Jiraphan, Teerapat Teetharatkul, Katti Sathaporn, Napakkawat Buathong, Pakawat Wiwattanaworaset","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-07049-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Social Functioning Scale (SFS) is widely used to evaluate social functioning in individuals with schizophrenia. While validated in various cultural contexts, adaptation for Thailand is necessary to address cultural and contextual nuances. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the SFS into Thai and assess its reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 109 individuals (52.3% female) diagnosed with schizophrenia was recruited from a university hospital in Thailand. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and reliability tests were conducted on six subscales of the Modified SFS- Thai version. Concurrent validity was assessed using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS), and Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EFA of four subscales-Independence Performance, Recreation, Pro-Social, and Independence Competence-revealed distinct factor structures with strong loadings. The Employment and Withdrawal/Interpersonal subscales could not undergo EFA due to binary items and insufficient sampling adequacy. Cronbach's alpha values of the modified subscales ranged from 0.75 to 0.87, indicating good internal consistency. Significant correlations with WHODAS 2.0, SOFAS, SAPS, and SANS confirmed the scale's validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Modified SFS- Thai version is a reliable and valid tool for assessing social functioning in individuals with schizophrenia. Its cultural adaptation enhances its relevance in Southeast Asia, offering valuable insights for clinical practice and research in low- and middle-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"589"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12143076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07049-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Social Functioning Scale (SFS) is widely used to evaluate social functioning in individuals with schizophrenia. While validated in various cultural contexts, adaptation for Thailand is necessary to address cultural and contextual nuances. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the SFS into Thai and assess its reliability and validity.

Methods: A sample of 109 individuals (52.3% female) diagnosed with schizophrenia was recruited from a university hospital in Thailand. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and reliability tests were conducted on six subscales of the Modified SFS- Thai version. Concurrent validity was assessed using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS), and Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS).

Results: EFA of four subscales-Independence Performance, Recreation, Pro-Social, and Independence Competence-revealed distinct factor structures with strong loadings. The Employment and Withdrawal/Interpersonal subscales could not undergo EFA due to binary items and insufficient sampling adequacy. Cronbach's alpha values of the modified subscales ranged from 0.75 to 0.87, indicating good internal consistency. Significant correlations with WHODAS 2.0, SOFAS, SAPS, and SANS confirmed the scale's validity.

Conclusions: The Modified SFS- Thai version is a reliable and valid tool for assessing social functioning in individuals with schizophrenia. Its cultural adaptation enhances its relevance in Southeast Asia, offering valuable insights for clinical practice and research in low- and middle-income countries.

泰国版改良社会功能量表(SFS)对精神分裂症患者的验证。
背景:社会功能量表(SFS)被广泛用于评估精神分裂症患者的社会功能。虽然在不同的文化背景下得到了验证,但泰国的适应是必要的,以解决文化和背景的细微差别。本研究的目的是翻译和文化适应的SFS到泰国,并评估其信度和效度。方法:从泰国一所大学医院招募109名确诊为精神分裂症的患者(52.3%为女性)。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和信度检验对修改后的SFS- Thai版的六个分量表进行分析。同时效度采用世界卫生组织残疾评估表2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)、社会与职业功能评估量表(SOFAS)、阳性症状评估量表(SAPS)和阴性症状评估量表(SANS)进行评估。结果:独立表现、娱乐、亲社会和独立能力四个分量表显示出不同的因素结构,且具有较强的负载。就业和退缩/人际关系子量表由于二元项目和抽样不足而不能进行全民教育。修正后子量表的Cronbach’s alpha值在0.75 ~ 0.87之间,内部一致性较好。与WHODAS 2.0、SOFAS、SAPS和SANS的显著相关性证实了量表的有效性。结论:改良的SFS-泰国版是评估精神分裂症患者社会功能的可靠和有效的工具。其文化适应性增强了其在东南亚的相关性,为低收入和中等收入国家的临床实践和研究提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信