Quality of life and oncologic safety of axillary reverse mapping in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-21 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000002915
Yu-Chen Fan, Lin Li, Xiang-Chao Meng
{"title":"Quality of life and oncologic safety of axillary reverse mapping in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yu-Chen Fan, Lin Li, Xiang-Chao Meng","doi":"10.1097/MS9.0000000000002915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The axillary reverse mapping (ARM) technique has recently been developed to prevent lymphedema by preserving upper extremity lymphatic drainage. In this article, we evaluated the quality of life and oncologic outcomes of ARM used in patients with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and other databases were searched for relevant articles published between 2013 and 2022. Randomized clinical trials were identified and included in the meta-analysis. The evaluated endpoints included lymphedema, the number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs), the number of patients with positive LNs, and shoulder restriction. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to analyze dichotomous data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies involving 1,820 patients were included for the meta-analysis, which revealed that ARM was associated with a reduced incidence of lymphedema (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.58; <i>P</i> = 0.0003). There were no significant differences in the number of retrieved LNs, the number of patients with positive LNs, and shoulder restriction between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ARM procedure achieved comparable success with a better quality of life and acceptable safe oncologic outcomes for patients with breast cancer. Future multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of ARM.</p>","PeriodicalId":8025,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"87 6","pages":"3707-3714"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The axillary reverse mapping (ARM) technique has recently been developed to prevent lymphedema by preserving upper extremity lymphatic drainage. In this article, we evaluated the quality of life and oncologic outcomes of ARM used in patients with breast cancer.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and other databases were searched for relevant articles published between 2013 and 2022. Randomized clinical trials were identified and included in the meta-analysis. The evaluated endpoints included lymphedema, the number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs), the number of patients with positive LNs, and shoulder restriction. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to analyze dichotomous data.

Results: Seven studies involving 1,820 patients were included for the meta-analysis, which revealed that ARM was associated with a reduced incidence of lymphedema (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.58; P = 0.0003). There were no significant differences in the number of retrieved LNs, the number of patients with positive LNs, and shoulder restriction between the two groups.

Conclusion: The ARM procedure achieved comparable success with a better quality of life and acceptable safe oncologic outcomes for patients with breast cancer. Future multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of ARM.

乳腺癌患者腋窝反向定位的生活质量和肿瘤安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:腋窝反向映射(ARM)技术最近被开发用于通过保留上肢淋巴引流来预防淋巴水肿。在这篇文章中,我们评估了乳腺癌患者使用ARM的生活质量和肿瘤预后。方法:检索PubMed、Embase等数据库2013 - 2022年间发表的相关文章。随机临床试验被确定并纳入meta分析。评估的终点包括淋巴水肿、淋巴结数量、淋巴结阳性患者数量和肩部受限。采用RevMan 5.3软件进行meta分析。比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(ci)用于分析二分类数据。结果:meta分析纳入了涉及1820例患者的7项研究,结果显示ARM与淋巴水肿发生率降低相关(OR, 0.30;95% ci, 0.16-0.58;P = 0.0003)。两组患者在回收LNs的数量、LNs阳性患者的数量和肩部受限方面无显著差异。结论:对于乳腺癌患者,ARM手术取得了相当的成功,具有更好的生活质量和可接受的安全肿瘤预后。未来的多中心随机对照试验需要进一步评估ARM的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Annals of Medicine and Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1665
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信