3D bio-printed scaffolds and smart implants: evaluating functional performance in animal surgery models.

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-12 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000003333
A S Vickram, Shofia Saghya Infant, S Manikandan, B Bhavani Sowndharya, G Gulothungan, Hitesh Chopra
{"title":"3D bio-printed scaffolds and smart implants: evaluating functional performance in animal surgery models.","authors":"A S Vickram, Shofia Saghya Infant, S Manikandan, B Bhavani Sowndharya, G Gulothungan, Hitesh Chopra","doi":"10.1097/MS9.0000000000003333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical models with an application of 3D bio-printed scaffolds and smart implants in animal surgery and their further applicability in regenerative medicine and implantology. This review discusses the functional performance of these advanced biomaterials in terms of mechanical properties, biodegradation rates, cellular responses, and in vivo integration. These 3D bio-printed scaffolds from hydrogels, bioceramics, and polymer composites feature tunable porosity (50-90%), mechanical strengths (0.1-50 MPa) and degradation rates compatible with bone, cartilage, and soft tissue engineering. Smart implants combining biosensors, drug delivery systems, and electrical stimulation in real time facilitate island operation of tissue regeneration. According to animal studies, titanium-based smart implants with surface-modified coatings show 86% osseointegration enhancement. In a rabbit knee model, gelatin-methacryloyl (GelMA) scaffolds for cartilage repair restored over 75% of native tissue function within 12 weeks. In rodent sciatic nerve defects, electrostimulated bio-scaffolds have induced a 40% increase in the rate of nerve regeneration. Concerning challenges, such as immune rejection and vascularization limitation, in addition to the demand for long-term stability, still require further improvements, including enhanced resolution of bioprinting technology and bioactive material offer. This review provides a critical assessment of qualitative and quantitative evidence to drive preclinical and translational studies in the wider context of precision medicine and next-generation, implantable biomaterials.</p>","PeriodicalId":8025,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"87 6","pages":"3618-3634"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgical models with an application of 3D bio-printed scaffolds and smart implants in animal surgery and their further applicability in regenerative medicine and implantology. This review discusses the functional performance of these advanced biomaterials in terms of mechanical properties, biodegradation rates, cellular responses, and in vivo integration. These 3D bio-printed scaffolds from hydrogels, bioceramics, and polymer composites feature tunable porosity (50-90%), mechanical strengths (0.1-50 MPa) and degradation rates compatible with bone, cartilage, and soft tissue engineering. Smart implants combining biosensors, drug delivery systems, and electrical stimulation in real time facilitate island operation of tissue regeneration. According to animal studies, titanium-based smart implants with surface-modified coatings show 86% osseointegration enhancement. In a rabbit knee model, gelatin-methacryloyl (GelMA) scaffolds for cartilage repair restored over 75% of native tissue function within 12 weeks. In rodent sciatic nerve defects, electrostimulated bio-scaffolds have induced a 40% increase in the rate of nerve regeneration. Concerning challenges, such as immune rejection and vascularization limitation, in addition to the demand for long-term stability, still require further improvements, including enhanced resolution of bioprinting technology and bioactive material offer. This review provides a critical assessment of qualitative and quantitative evidence to drive preclinical and translational studies in the wider context of precision medicine and next-generation, implantable biomaterials.

3D生物打印支架和智能植入物:在动物手术模型中评估功能性能。
生物3D打印支架和智能植入物在动物外科手术中的应用及其在再生医学和植入学中的进一步应用。本文从力学性能、生物降解率、细胞反应和体内整合等方面讨论了这些先进生物材料的功能性能。这些由水凝胶、生物陶瓷和聚合物复合材料制成的3D生物打印支架具有可调的孔隙率(50-90%)、机械强度(0.1-50 MPa)和降解率,与骨、软骨和软组织工程兼容。结合生物传感器、药物输送系统和实时电刺激的智能植入物促进了组织再生的岛式操作。根据动物研究,钛基智能植入物表面改性涂层显示86%的骨整合增强。在兔膝关节模型中,用于软骨修复的明胶-甲基丙烯酰(GelMA)支架在12周内恢复了75%以上的原始组织功能。在啮齿动物坐骨神经缺损中,电刺激生物支架诱导神经再生率提高40%。关于诸如免疫排斥和血管化限制等挑战,除了对长期稳定性的需求外,还需要进一步改进,包括提高生物打印技术的分辨率和提供生物活性材料。本综述提供了定性和定量证据的关键评估,以推动更广泛的精准医学和下一代可植入生物材料的临床前和转化研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Annals of Medicine and Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1665
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信