{"title":"Preservation Rhinoplasty Performed Simultaneously with Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: Last Evolution in Orthofacial Surgery.","authors":"Mirco Raffaini, Francesco Arcuri","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04919-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Since 2018, we have begun to perform preservation rhinoplasty (PR). To the best of our knowledge, very few studies have evaluated simultaneous orthognathic surgery and PR. The aim of the present study was therefore to assess the safety, efficacy, advantages, and disadvantages of PR performed at the time as OS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective monocentric study was conducted on all patients with malocclusion who underwent OS and PR between January 2018 and December 2022 at the Face Surgery Center in Parma, Italy. Subtypes of dorsal preservation were reported according to a recent classification: type 1 (full let down), type 2 (bone scoring + full let down), type 3 (bone scoring + basal osteotomies + cartilage let down), type 4 (bone scoring + cartilage let down), type 5 (bone scoring + upper cartilage rim resection).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the application of exclusion criteria, the final study cohort comprised 118 patients (41 males and 77 females), with a mean age of 22 years (range 17-38 years) at the time of surgery. The distribution of PR cases was as follows: type 1 = 29, type 2 = 34, type 3 = 27, type 4 = 16, type 5 = 12. The mean duration of the complete procedure was 207 min, ranging from 170 to 220 min. A total of 15 complication events (12.7%) were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This article provides evidence that simultaneous OS and PR can be a viable option for patients with malocclusion and nasal deformity.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence iv: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04919-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Since 2018, we have begun to perform preservation rhinoplasty (PR). To the best of our knowledge, very few studies have evaluated simultaneous orthognathic surgery and PR. The aim of the present study was therefore to assess the safety, efficacy, advantages, and disadvantages of PR performed at the time as OS.
Materials and methods: A retrospective monocentric study was conducted on all patients with malocclusion who underwent OS and PR between January 2018 and December 2022 at the Face Surgery Center in Parma, Italy. Subtypes of dorsal preservation were reported according to a recent classification: type 1 (full let down), type 2 (bone scoring + full let down), type 3 (bone scoring + basal osteotomies + cartilage let down), type 4 (bone scoring + cartilage let down), type 5 (bone scoring + upper cartilage rim resection).
Results: Following the application of exclusion criteria, the final study cohort comprised 118 patients (41 males and 77 females), with a mean age of 22 years (range 17-38 years) at the time of surgery. The distribution of PR cases was as follows: type 1 = 29, type 2 = 34, type 3 = 27, type 4 = 16, type 5 = 12. The mean duration of the complete procedure was 207 min, ranging from 170 to 220 min. A total of 15 complication events (12.7%) were reported.
Conclusion: This article provides evidence that simultaneous OS and PR can be a viable option for patients with malocclusion and nasal deformity.
Level of evidence iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP).
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.