Differentiating the Impacts of Natural Growth and Artificial Restoration of Vegetation on Water Use Efficiency in the Yellow River Basin

IF 3.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jinkai Luan, Ning Ma, Jiefeng Wu, Ran Zhang
{"title":"Differentiating the Impacts of Natural Growth and Artificial Restoration of Vegetation on Water Use Efficiency in the Yellow River Basin","authors":"Jinkai Luan,&nbsp;Ning Ma,&nbsp;Jiefeng Wu,&nbsp;Ran Zhang","doi":"10.1029/2025JG008906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Vegetation change is closely linked to fluctuations in ecosystem water use efficiency (WUE). Although vegetation change (VC) involves the natural growth (NG) and the artificial restoration (AR), the individual impacts of these two processes on WUE remain poorly understood. This study used a recently developed ecohydrological model, integrating observed streamflow and multiple remote sensing data sets, to quantify the effects of NG and AR on WUE through three distinct vegetation scenarios in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) of China from 1998 to 2020. This region has experienced remarkable vegetation changes due to both natural and anthropogenic factors. The results show that, on average, VC led to a 13.3% increase in WUE in the YRB. However, NG and AR had contrasting impacts: the former contributed to a 7.4% decrease in WUE, whereas the latter caused a 22.4% increase in WUE. Spatially, NG reduced WUE in the southeastern YRB and the marginal areas of the Tibetan Plateau with somewhat higher precipitation but increased WUE in certain northern and northwestern regions of the YRB with lower precipitation. In contrast, AR generally reduced WUE in arid regions but increased WUE in wetter ones, showing effects opposite to those of NG. However, in specific areas like the Mu Us Sandy Land, a typical dry region, both NG and AR enlarged WUE. In all scenarios, the primary driver of WUE changes appeared to be net primary productivity rather than evapotranspiration. This study provides practical insights for sustainable water resource and ecological management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","volume":"130 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JG008906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vegetation change is closely linked to fluctuations in ecosystem water use efficiency (WUE). Although vegetation change (VC) involves the natural growth (NG) and the artificial restoration (AR), the individual impacts of these two processes on WUE remain poorly understood. This study used a recently developed ecohydrological model, integrating observed streamflow and multiple remote sensing data sets, to quantify the effects of NG and AR on WUE through three distinct vegetation scenarios in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) of China from 1998 to 2020. This region has experienced remarkable vegetation changes due to both natural and anthropogenic factors. The results show that, on average, VC led to a 13.3% increase in WUE in the YRB. However, NG and AR had contrasting impacts: the former contributed to a 7.4% decrease in WUE, whereas the latter caused a 22.4% increase in WUE. Spatially, NG reduced WUE in the southeastern YRB and the marginal areas of the Tibetan Plateau with somewhat higher precipitation but increased WUE in certain northern and northwestern regions of the YRB with lower precipitation. In contrast, AR generally reduced WUE in arid regions but increased WUE in wetter ones, showing effects opposite to those of NG. However, in specific areas like the Mu Us Sandy Land, a typical dry region, both NG and AR enlarged WUE. In all scenarios, the primary driver of WUE changes appeared to be net primary productivity rather than evapotranspiration. This study provides practical insights for sustainable water resource and ecological management.

黄河流域植被自然生长与人工恢复对水分利用效率影响的分异
植被变化与生态系统水分利用效率(WUE)的波动密切相关。植被变化(VC)包括自然生长(NG)和人工恢复(AR)两个过程,但这两个过程对WUE的个体影响尚不清楚。本研究利用最近开发的生态水文模型,整合观测流量和多个遥感数据集,通过1998 - 2020年黄河流域三种不同植被情景,量化了NG和AR对WUE的影响。受自然和人为因素的影响,该地区植被发生了显著的变化。结果表明,VC平均使YRB的WUE增加13.3%。然而,NG和AR产生了截然不同的影响:前者导致WUE下降7.4%,而后者导致WUE增加22.4%。从空间上看,青藏高原东南部和青藏高原边缘地区降水偏多,水分利用效率降低;青藏高原北部和西北部部分地区降水偏少,水分利用效率增加。而在干旱区,AR总体上降低了WUE,而在湿润地区则增加了WUE,与NG的作用相反。然而,在特定地区,如毛乌素沙地,一个典型的干旱地区,NG和AR都扩大了WUE。在所有情景中,水分利用效率变化的主要驱动因素似乎是净初级生产力,而不是蒸散发。本研究为水资源的可持续发展和生态管理提供了实践见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Paleontology
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: JGR-Biogeosciences focuses on biogeosciences of the Earth system in the past, present, and future and the extension of this research to planetary studies. The emerging field of biogeosciences spans the intellectual interface between biology and the geosciences and attempts to understand the functions of the Earth system across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Studies in biogeosciences may use multiple lines of evidence drawn from diverse fields to gain a holistic understanding of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems and extreme environments. Specific topics within the scope of the section include process-based theoretical, experimental, and field studies of biogeochemistry, biogeophysics, atmosphere-, land-, and ocean-ecosystem interactions, biomineralization, life in extreme environments, astrobiology, microbial processes, geomicrobiology, and evolutionary geobiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信