IDEAL-Acu: A Methodological Framework for Evaluating the Effects of Acupuncture

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jiali Liu, Xiaochao Luo, Yemeng Chen, Ling Zhao, Minghong Yao, Jiajie Yu, Jiahui Yang, Ling Li, Xin Sun
{"title":"IDEAL-Acu: A Methodological Framework for Evaluating the Effects of Acupuncture","authors":"Jiali Liu,&nbsp;Xiaochao Luo,&nbsp;Yemeng Chen,&nbsp;Ling Zhao,&nbsp;Minghong Yao,&nbsp;Jiajie Yu,&nbsp;Jiahui Yang,&nbsp;Ling Li,&nbsp;Xin Sun","doi":"10.1111/jebm.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The demand for high-quality clinical evidence supporting acupuncture remains urgent, necessitating the establishment of a suitable methodological framework to promote its generation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Following internal deliberations and extensive online discussions with experts in the IDEAL Collaboration, we proposed the IDEAL-Acu framework specifically for acupuncture, based on the surgery-focused IDEAL model with necessary modifications to accommodate the characteristics of acupuncture. To ensure consensus on recommendations, a panel of external experts and internal research team members was convened, and any disagreements were iteratively resolved through expert review.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>This article introduces an IDEAL-Acu framework with five stages for evaluating acupuncture outcome and improving practice to optimize treatment. The framework includes Idea (proposal of an acupuncture regime), Development (optimization or standardization of the acupuncture regime), Exploration (feasibility assessment for conducting a definitive RCT), Assessment (evaluation of effects through comparison with standard therapy or sham acupuncture), and Long-term monitoring (examination of long-term efficacy and safety) stages. We provide clear recommendations for each stage along with specific examples.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The framework highlights the importance of conducting studies at each stage in acupuncture evaluation process and can serve as a helpful guide for assessing its effects and promoting evidence-based practice in acupuncture.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jebm.70043","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jebm.70043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The demand for high-quality clinical evidence supporting acupuncture remains urgent, necessitating the establishment of a suitable methodological framework to promote its generation.

Methods

Following internal deliberations and extensive online discussions with experts in the IDEAL Collaboration, we proposed the IDEAL-Acu framework specifically for acupuncture, based on the surgery-focused IDEAL model with necessary modifications to accommodate the characteristics of acupuncture. To ensure consensus on recommendations, a panel of external experts and internal research team members was convened, and any disagreements were iteratively resolved through expert review.

Results

This article introduces an IDEAL-Acu framework with five stages for evaluating acupuncture outcome and improving practice to optimize treatment. The framework includes Idea (proposal of an acupuncture regime), Development (optimization or standardization of the acupuncture regime), Exploration (feasibility assessment for conducting a definitive RCT), Assessment (evaluation of effects through comparison with standard therapy or sham acupuncture), and Long-term monitoring (examination of long-term efficacy and safety) stages. We provide clear recommendations for each stage along with specific examples.

Conclusion

The framework highlights the importance of conducting studies at each stage in acupuncture evaluation process and can serve as a helpful guide for assessing its effects and promoting evidence-based practice in acupuncture.

Abstract Image

理想- acu:评价针灸疗效的方法学框架
对支持针灸的高质量临床证据的需求仍然迫切,需要建立一个合适的方法学框架来促进其产生。方法:经过IDEAL协作组织的内部审议和与专家的广泛在线讨论,我们提出了专门针对针灸的IDEAL- acu框架,该框架基于以手术为中心的IDEAL模型,并进行了必要的修改,以适应针灸的特点。为了确保在建议上达成共识,我们召集了一个由外部专家和内部研究团队成员组成的小组,任何分歧都通过专家审查反复解决。结果介绍了一种分为五个阶段的IDEAL-Acu框架,用于评价针刺疗效和改进实践,以优化治疗。该框架包括Idea(针灸方案的建议)、Development(针灸方案的优化或标准化)、Exploration(进行最终RCT的可行性评估)、assessment(通过与标准疗法或假针灸进行比较来评估效果)和长期监测(检查长期疗效和安全性)阶段。我们为每个阶段提供了明确的建议以及具体的示例。结论该框架强调了在针灸评价过程的各个阶段开展研究的重要性,可为评估针灸疗效和促进针灸循证实践提供有益的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine (EMB) is an esteemed international healthcare and medical decision-making journal, dedicated to publishing groundbreaking research outcomes in evidence-based decision-making, research, practice, and education. Serving as the official English-language journal of the Cochrane China Centre and West China Hospital of Sichuan University, we eagerly welcome editorials, commentaries, and systematic reviews encompassing various topics such as clinical trials, policy, drug and patient safety, education, and knowledge translation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信