Overconfidence of medical residents to perform entrustable professional activities in a General Surgery Residency Program

Q2 Social Sciences
Leonardo Salviano da Fonseca Rezende , Aleida Nazareth Soares , Rosa Malena Delbone , Marcus Vinícius Melo de Andrade , Alexandre Sampaio Moura
{"title":"Overconfidence of medical residents to perform entrustable professional activities in a General Surgery Residency Program","authors":"Leonardo Salviano da Fonseca Rezende ,&nbsp;Aleida Nazareth Soares ,&nbsp;Rosa Malena Delbone ,&nbsp;Marcus Vinícius Melo de Andrade ,&nbsp;Alexandre Sampaio Moura","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2025.101066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Competency-based medical education (CBME) has been implemented in postgraduate medical education, and Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) seem appropriate for operationalizing it. However, the association between residents´ self-perceived confidence in performing EPAs and entrustment levels assigned by a Clinical Competence Committee (CCC) must be better understood. We aimed to compare general surgery residents' self-assessment of confidence to perform EPAs and entrustment levels assigned by a CCC.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional study conducted in the General Surgery Residency Program at Santa Casa BH Hospital between March and May 2023. Residents self-assessed their confidence to perform 16 EPAs using a 5-point entrustment scale. Confidence levels were compared to entrustment levels assigned by the CCC. A comparison was performed separately for each EPA and by EPA characteristics (clinical surgical vs. procedural and simple x complex).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was a significant difference between the self-assessed confidence levels and the autonomy levels assigned by the CCC in nine of the 16 EPAs. Residents' self-assessment levels were higher than those assigned by the CCC for clinical surgical EPAs (4.3 ± 0.8 vs. 3.2 ± 1.4, respectively; p &lt; 0.001) and simple EPAs (2.8 ± 1.0 vs. 2.2 ± 0.8, respectively; p = 0.023). In procedural and complex EPAs, this difference was not statistically significant (p &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Residents tended to overestimate their level of autonomy, especially for clinical-surgical EPAs and simpler EPAs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":"26 5","pages":"Article 101066"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181325000440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Competency-based medical education (CBME) has been implemented in postgraduate medical education, and Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) seem appropriate for operationalizing it. However, the association between residents´ self-perceived confidence in performing EPAs and entrustment levels assigned by a Clinical Competence Committee (CCC) must be better understood. We aimed to compare general surgery residents' self-assessment of confidence to perform EPAs and entrustment levels assigned by a CCC.

Material and methods

Cross-sectional study conducted in the General Surgery Residency Program at Santa Casa BH Hospital between March and May 2023. Residents self-assessed their confidence to perform 16 EPAs using a 5-point entrustment scale. Confidence levels were compared to entrustment levels assigned by the CCC. A comparison was performed separately for each EPA and by EPA characteristics (clinical surgical vs. procedural and simple x complex).

Results

There was a significant difference between the self-assessed confidence levels and the autonomy levels assigned by the CCC in nine of the 16 EPAs. Residents' self-assessment levels were higher than those assigned by the CCC for clinical surgical EPAs (4.3 ± 0.8 vs. 3.2 ± 1.4, respectively; p < 0.001) and simple EPAs (2.8 ± 1.0 vs. 2.2 ± 0.8, respectively; p = 0.023). In procedural and complex EPAs, this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Residents tended to overestimate their level of autonomy, especially for clinical-surgical EPAs and simpler EPAs.
在普通外科住院医师项目中,住院医师对执行可信赖的专业活动过于自信
基于能力的医学教育(CBME)已经在研究生医学教育中实施,而可信赖的专业活动(EPAs)似乎适合于实施它。然而,必须更好地理解居民对执行EPAs的自我感知信心与临床能力委员会(CCC)指定的委托水平之间的关系。我们的目的是比较普通外科住院医师对执行EPAs的信心自我评估和CCC指定的委托水平。材料和方法在2023年3月至5月期间在Santa Casa BH医院的普通外科住院医师项目中进行的横断面研究。居民们用5分制的委托量表自我评估了他们执行16项环境保护措施的信心。将置信水平与CCC指定的委托水平进行比较。分别对每种EPA和EPA特征进行比较(临床手术vs.程序和简单x复杂)。结果16个评价对象中有9个评价对象的自评信心水平与CCC赋予的自主水平存在显著性差异。居民对临床外科EPAs的自我评价水平高于CCC(分别为4.3 ± 0.8 vs. 3.2 ± 1.4);p <; 0.001)和简单EPAs(分别为2.8 ± 1.0 vs. 2.2 ± 0.8); = 0.023页)。在程序性和复杂EPAs中,这一差异无统计学意义(p >; 0.05)。结论住院医师倾向于高估他们的自主水平,特别是对于临床外科辅助护理和简单的辅助护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educacion Medica
Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信