Carol L. Wagner , John E. Baatz , Myla Ebeling , Danforth A. Newton , Judith R. Shary , Mathew Gregoski , Mark T. Wagner , David Zava , Carole Baggerly , Sonya Ketchens , Jeffrey Korte , Bruce W. Hollis
{"title":"Exploring the association between vitamin D status and Corona Virus-19 infection in a cohort of adults aged 50 years and older","authors":"Carol L. Wagner , John E. Baatz , Myla Ebeling , Danforth A. Newton , Judith R. Shary , Mathew Gregoski , Mark T. Wagner , David Zava , Carole Baggerly , Sonya Ketchens , Jeffrey Korte , Bruce W. Hollis","doi":"10.1016/j.nutos.2025.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Evaluate the association between vitamin D (vitD) status and Corona Virus-19 (COVID-19) infection in adults aged 50 years and older.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Adults ≥50 undergoing COVID-19 testing from July 2020 to December 2021, without prior vaccination, consented to blood analysis. SARS-CoV-2 PCR confirmed current COVID-19 infection. VitD status was assessed via 25(OH)D concentration (LCMS/MS, ZRT Labs, Portland, OR). Sociodemographic data were collected at enrollment. Statistical analyses (SAS 9.4) examined associations between sociodemographics, COVID-19, and vitD status. Multivariate logistic regression analyzed factors linked to COVID-19 or vitD status.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 131 participants, 46.6% were ≥65 years old, 71.0% married, 19.9% Black American, 36.6% male, 38.9% Medicaid/Medicare/self-pay, and 42.8% BMI≥30. VitD status and Black American (<em>P</em>=0.0001) significantly associated with COVID-19 infection (<em>P</em>=0.0001). Black American (<em>P</em>=0.0003), males (<em>P</em>=0.003), and BMI (<em>P</em>=0.007) were inversely associated with 25(OH)D concentration. In a multiple logistic regression model predicting COVID-19 infection, only vitamin D status remained significant after controlling for certain sociodemographic and clinical factors (<em>P</em><0.0001, OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89–0.95).</div><div>Of the 44 COVID-positive participants, 35 (79.6%) were hospitalized and 19 (43.2%) were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Hospitalization due to COVID-19 was associated with age ≥65 years old (<em>P</em>=0.02; OR 12.0, 95% CI 1.34–106.79), male (<em>P</em>=0.02, OR 10.7, 95% CI 1.20–94.73), and 25(OH)D <40 ng/mL (<em>P</em>=0.0006, OR 42.5, 95% CI 3.90–461.01). In multivariate analysis, the association between vitamin D status and the risk of COVID-related hospitalization remained significant and inversely associated (<em>P</em>=0.03, OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78–0.99).</div><div>In unadjusted analysis, COVID pneumonia was associated with male sex (<em>P</em>=0.049; OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.06–20.16) and 25(OH)D <40 ng/mL (<em>P</em>=0.006, OR 18.8, 95% CI 1.9–184.10). Participants with COVID infection and 25(OH)D <20 ng/mL were 2.1 times more likely to be admitted to ICU/death (<em>P</em>=0.03). In unadjusted analysis, ICU admission and/or death were linked to age ≥65 years (<em>P</em>=0.0002, OR 16.9, 95% CI 3.63–78.56), Medicaid/Medicare/self-pay insurance status (<em>P</em>=0.004, OR 0.1, 0.04–0.56), and 25(OH)D <20 (<em>P</em>=0.03, OR 3.9, 1.09–13.66) and <40 ng/mL (<em>P</em>=0.03); however, only age ≥65 remained significant in multivariate analysis (<em>P</em>=0.04, OR 6.7, CI 1.05–43.0).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Lower 25(OH)D concentration was a significant predictor and/or contributor to COVID-19 infection, suggesting the importance of maintaining adequate vitamin D status in reducing infection risk and mitigating severe outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36134,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","volume":"62 ","pages":"Pages 48-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nutrition Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667268525000567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Evaluate the association between vitamin D (vitD) status and Corona Virus-19 (COVID-19) infection in adults aged 50 years and older.
Design
Adults ≥50 undergoing COVID-19 testing from July 2020 to December 2021, without prior vaccination, consented to blood analysis. SARS-CoV-2 PCR confirmed current COVID-19 infection. VitD status was assessed via 25(OH)D concentration (LCMS/MS, ZRT Labs, Portland, OR). Sociodemographic data were collected at enrollment. Statistical analyses (SAS 9.4) examined associations between sociodemographics, COVID-19, and vitD status. Multivariate logistic regression analyzed factors linked to COVID-19 or vitD status.
Results
Of 131 participants, 46.6% were ≥65 years old, 71.0% married, 19.9% Black American, 36.6% male, 38.9% Medicaid/Medicare/self-pay, and 42.8% BMI≥30. VitD status and Black American (P=0.0001) significantly associated with COVID-19 infection (P=0.0001). Black American (P=0.0003), males (P=0.003), and BMI (P=0.007) were inversely associated with 25(OH)D concentration. In a multiple logistic regression model predicting COVID-19 infection, only vitamin D status remained significant after controlling for certain sociodemographic and clinical factors (P<0.0001, OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89–0.95).
Of the 44 COVID-positive participants, 35 (79.6%) were hospitalized and 19 (43.2%) were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Hospitalization due to COVID-19 was associated with age ≥65 years old (P=0.02; OR 12.0, 95% CI 1.34–106.79), male (P=0.02, OR 10.7, 95% CI 1.20–94.73), and 25(OH)D <40 ng/mL (P=0.0006, OR 42.5, 95% CI 3.90–461.01). In multivariate analysis, the association between vitamin D status and the risk of COVID-related hospitalization remained significant and inversely associated (P=0.03, OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78–0.99).
In unadjusted analysis, COVID pneumonia was associated with male sex (P=0.049; OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.06–20.16) and 25(OH)D <40 ng/mL (P=0.006, OR 18.8, 95% CI 1.9–184.10). Participants with COVID infection and 25(OH)D <20 ng/mL were 2.1 times more likely to be admitted to ICU/death (P=0.03). In unadjusted analysis, ICU admission and/or death were linked to age ≥65 years (P=0.0002, OR 16.9, 95% CI 3.63–78.56), Medicaid/Medicare/self-pay insurance status (P=0.004, OR 0.1, 0.04–0.56), and 25(OH)D <20 (P=0.03, OR 3.9, 1.09–13.66) and <40 ng/mL (P=0.03); however, only age ≥65 remained significant in multivariate analysis (P=0.04, OR 6.7, CI 1.05–43.0).
Conclusions
Lower 25(OH)D concentration was a significant predictor and/or contributor to COVID-19 infection, suggesting the importance of maintaining adequate vitamin D status in reducing infection risk and mitigating severe outcomes.
目的探讨50岁及以上成人维生素D (vitD)水平与冠状病毒(COVID-19)感染的关系。设计:2020年7月至2021年12月期间接受COVID-19检测的≥50岁成人,未事先接种疫苗,同意进行血液分析。SARS-CoV-2 PCR证实当前感染COVID-19。通过25(OH)D浓度(LCMS/MS, ZRT Labs, Portland, OR)评估VitD状态。在入组时收集社会人口统计数据。统计分析(SAS 9.4)检查了社会人口统计学、COVID-19和vitD状态之间的关联。多因素logistic回归分析了与COVID-19或vitD状态相关的因素。131名参与者中,46.6%≥65岁,71.0%已婚,19.9%为黑人,36.6%为男性,38.9%为医疗补助/医疗保险/自付,42.8%为BMI≥30。VitD状态和美国黑人(P=0.0001)与COVID-19感染显著相关(P=0.0001)。美国黑人(P=0.0003)、男性(P=0.003)和BMI (P=0.007)与25(OH)D浓度呈负相关。在预测COVID-19感染的多元logistic回归模型中,在控制了某些社会人口统计学和临床因素后,只有维生素D状态仍然显著(P<0.0001, OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.95)。在44名新冠病毒阳性参与者中,35人(79.6%)住院,19人(43.2%)住进重症监护病房(ICU)。COVID-19住院与年龄≥65岁相关(P=0.02;OR 12.0, 95% CI 1.34-106.79),男性(P=0.02, OR 10.7, 95% CI 1.20-94.73)和25(OH)D <40 ng/mL (P=0.0006, OR 42.5, 95% CI 3.90-461.01)。在多变量分析中,维生素D状态与covid相关住院风险之间的相关性仍然显著且呈负相关(P=0.03, OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-0.99)。未经校正分析,COVID -肺炎与男性相关(P=0.049;OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.06-20.16)和25(OH)D <40 ng/mL (P=0.006, OR 18.8, 95% CI 1.9-184.10)。感染COVID和25(OH)D <;20 ng/mL的参与者入院/死亡的可能性增加2.1倍(P=0.03)。在未经调整的分析中,ICU入院和/或死亡与年龄≥65岁(P=0.0002, or 16.9, 95% CI 3.63-78.56)、医疗补助/医疗保险/自费保险状况(P=0.004, or 0.1, 0.04-0.56)、25(OH)D <20 (P=0.03, or 3.9, 1.09-13.66)和40 ng/mL (P=0.03)相关;然而,在多变量分析中,只有年龄≥65岁仍然具有显著性(P=0.04, OR 6.7, CI 1.05-43.0)。结论较低的25(OH)D浓度是COVID-19感染的重要预测因子和/或促成因子,提示维持足够的维生素D水平对降低感染风险和减轻严重后果的重要性。