Dealing with measures: Archaeology, cognitive neuroscience and the evolutionary origin of numerical thinking

IF 0.8 4区 地球科学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Fabio Macciardi , Viola Castellani , James H. Fallon , Fabio Martini
{"title":"Dealing with measures: Archaeology, cognitive neuroscience and the evolutionary origin of numerical thinking","authors":"Fabio Macciardi ,&nbsp;Viola Castellani ,&nbsp;James H. Fallon ,&nbsp;Fabio Martini","doi":"10.1016/j.anthro.2025.103380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The emergence of the cognitive use of numbers and numerical systems is still poorly explored in prehistoric archeology and cognitive science. A few studies have investigated the topic based on alternative hypotheses, namely that a symbolic numerical thought emerged in a relatively recent past and is mostly culturally based or, on the contrary, that it is a biologically grounded trait as shown by a long evolutionary history that humans share in part with other animals. We hypothesize that evolutionary biological mechanisms and cultural learning are interacting with each other within the hominin clade, building the cognitive bases of our numerical thinking through a complex process that has required a long time to develop. We analyze exemplary findings from a not-abundant but still significant archaeological record that conveys numerical information, and that can be attributed not only to <em>Homosapiens</em> but also to earlier hominin species, <em>Homo</em> <em>erectus</em> and <em>Homo</em> <em>neanderthalensis</em>. We aim to show that transitioning from “quantical” numerosity (also defined as “the number sense”: a perception of quantities we share with other non-human species) to cognitive numerical thinking requires an interplay of neural and molecular structures as biological prerequisites interacting with the cultural transmission. Our interpretation of the archaeological record and a biological-cultural process observed from <em>Homo erectus</em> to <em>Homosapiens</em> supports the hypothesis that the ability to use numerical concepts is part of a broader symbolic abstract cognition. In this context, the cognitive idea of number surpasses the mere “interpretation” of the meaning of the archaeological object. Archaeological artifacts possess structural, unintended properties that can acquire significance in contexts other than their original purpose (McLaughlin, 2014).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46860,"journal":{"name":"Anthropologie","volume":"129 3","pages":"Article 103380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropologie","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003552125000317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of the cognitive use of numbers and numerical systems is still poorly explored in prehistoric archeology and cognitive science. A few studies have investigated the topic based on alternative hypotheses, namely that a symbolic numerical thought emerged in a relatively recent past and is mostly culturally based or, on the contrary, that it is a biologically grounded trait as shown by a long evolutionary history that humans share in part with other animals. We hypothesize that evolutionary biological mechanisms and cultural learning are interacting with each other within the hominin clade, building the cognitive bases of our numerical thinking through a complex process that has required a long time to develop. We analyze exemplary findings from a not-abundant but still significant archaeological record that conveys numerical information, and that can be attributed not only to Homosapiens but also to earlier hominin species, Homo erectus and Homo neanderthalensis. We aim to show that transitioning from “quantical” numerosity (also defined as “the number sense”: a perception of quantities we share with other non-human species) to cognitive numerical thinking requires an interplay of neural and molecular structures as biological prerequisites interacting with the cultural transmission. Our interpretation of the archaeological record and a biological-cultural process observed from Homo erectus to Homosapiens supports the hypothesis that the ability to use numerical concepts is part of a broader symbolic abstract cognition. In this context, the cognitive idea of number surpasses the mere “interpretation” of the meaning of the archaeological object. Archaeological artifacts possess structural, unintended properties that can acquire significance in contexts other than their original purpose (McLaughlin, 2014).
处理措施:考古学,认知神经科学和数字思维的进化起源
在史前考古学和认知科学中,对数字和数字系统的认知使用的出现仍然知之甚少。一些研究基于其他假设调查了这个话题,即象征性的数字思想出现在相对较近的过去,主要是基于文化的,或者相反,它是一种基于生物学的特征,正如人类与其他动物部分共享的漫长进化历史所显示的那样。我们假设,进化的生物机制和文化学习在古人类分支中相互作用,通过一个需要很长时间才能发展的复杂过程,建立了我们数字思维的认知基础。我们分析了一个不丰富但仍然重要的考古记录的典型发现,这些记录传达了数字信息,不仅可以归因于智人,还可以归因于更早的人类物种,直立人和尼安德特人。我们的目标是表明,从“数量”的数量(也被定义为“数字感”:我们与其他非人类物种共享的数量感知)到认知数字思维的过渡需要神经和分子结构的相互作用,作为生物先决条件与文化传播相互作用。我们对从直立人到智人的考古记录和生物文化过程的解释支持这样的假设,即使用数字概念的能力是更广泛的象征性抽象认知的一部分。在这种情况下,对数字的认知观念超越了对考古对象意义的单纯“解释”。考古文物具有结构上的、意想不到的特性,可以在其原始用途以外的环境中获得意义(McLaughlin, 2014)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anthropologie
Anthropologie ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: First published in 1890, Anthropologie remains one of the most important journals devoted to prehistoric sciences and paleoanthropology. It regularly publishes thematic issues, originalsarticles and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信