Study on key causal factors and pathways of fire and explosion accidents in hazardous chemical storage tank area

IF 4.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Wei Jiang, Shengxiang Ma, Zhuoye Zhang, Yuan Xu
{"title":"Study on key causal factors and pathways of fire and explosion accidents in hazardous chemical storage tank area","authors":"Wei Jiang,&nbsp;Shengxiang Ma,&nbsp;Zhuoye Zhang,&nbsp;Yuan Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accidents occurred in hazardous chemical storage areas often have significant impacts and serious consequences. To ensure the safety and health of employees and prevent accidents in hazardous chemical storage areas, it is necessary to explore the key causal factors and critical paths of accidents through certain technical means. Therefore, this paper proposes a research method that combines text mining, association rule mining, and Bayesian networks to conduct in-depth mining and analysis of textual data from cases of hazardous chemical storage tank area fire and explosion accidents (HCSTAFEAs), thereby effectively identifying the causal factors of such accidents and exploring the degree of interaction, importance, and critical paths of the causal factors. First, this paper improved the text mining process by using methods such as grounded theory, text processing, and Chinese word segmentation to mine 60 collected reports, resulting in 68 primary causal factors, 17 secondary causal factors, and 6 tertiary causal factors. Second, the grey relational method was used to analyze the impact of the causal factors, quantitatively determining the importance of each causal factor and further refining them. The Apriori algorithm was subsequently employed to obtain the frequent itemsets and strong association rules of the accident causal factors, and a Bayesian network model was constructed. Through sensitivity analysis and critical path analysis, the key causal factors and critical paths of HCSTAFEAs were identified. The study indicates that five high-sensitivity causal factors—equipment and operation status control defects, equipment maintenance and management defects, unsafe acts, safety management systems and implementation defects, and safety training defects—are the key causal factors of HCSTAFEAs. In addition, three key paths that trigger accidents were obtained: safety management systems and implementation defects → safety training defects → internal supervision defects → operational program defects → unsafe acts; safety management systems and implementation defects → safety training defects → equipment maintenance and management defects → equipment and operation status control defects; and safety management systems and implementation defects → safety training defects → internal supervision defects → operational program defects → equipment and operation status control defects. This paper provides insights into the effective mining and extraction of unstructured accident investigation report textual information and offers a perspective for research on the identification of causal factors and critical paths of accidents in hazardous chemical storage areas based on data-driven thinking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 105704"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423025001627","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accidents occurred in hazardous chemical storage areas often have significant impacts and serious consequences. To ensure the safety and health of employees and prevent accidents in hazardous chemical storage areas, it is necessary to explore the key causal factors and critical paths of accidents through certain technical means. Therefore, this paper proposes a research method that combines text mining, association rule mining, and Bayesian networks to conduct in-depth mining and analysis of textual data from cases of hazardous chemical storage tank area fire and explosion accidents (HCSTAFEAs), thereby effectively identifying the causal factors of such accidents and exploring the degree of interaction, importance, and critical paths of the causal factors. First, this paper improved the text mining process by using methods such as grounded theory, text processing, and Chinese word segmentation to mine 60 collected reports, resulting in 68 primary causal factors, 17 secondary causal factors, and 6 tertiary causal factors. Second, the grey relational method was used to analyze the impact of the causal factors, quantitatively determining the importance of each causal factor and further refining them. The Apriori algorithm was subsequently employed to obtain the frequent itemsets and strong association rules of the accident causal factors, and a Bayesian network model was constructed. Through sensitivity analysis and critical path analysis, the key causal factors and critical paths of HCSTAFEAs were identified. The study indicates that five high-sensitivity causal factors—equipment and operation status control defects, equipment maintenance and management defects, unsafe acts, safety management systems and implementation defects, and safety training defects—are the key causal factors of HCSTAFEAs. In addition, three key paths that trigger accidents were obtained: safety management systems and implementation defects → safety training defects → internal supervision defects → operational program defects → unsafe acts; safety management systems and implementation defects → safety training defects → equipment maintenance and management defects → equipment and operation status control defects; and safety management systems and implementation defects → safety training defects → internal supervision defects → operational program defects → equipment and operation status control defects. This paper provides insights into the effective mining and extraction of unstructured accident investigation report textual information and offers a perspective for research on the identification of causal factors and critical paths of accidents in hazardous chemical storage areas based on data-driven thinking.
危险化学品储罐区火灾爆炸事故的关键原因及途径研究
危险化学品储存区发生的事故往往影响重大,后果严重。为了确保危险化学品储存区员工的安全与健康,防止事故的发生,有必要通过一定的技术手段,探索事故发生的关键原因和关键路径。因此,本文提出了一种结合文本挖掘、关联规则挖掘和贝叶斯网络的研究方法,对危险化学品储罐区火灾爆炸事故(hcstafea)案例的文本数据进行深度挖掘和分析,从而有效识别事故的因果因素,探索因果因素的相互作用程度、重要性和关键路径。首先,本文利用扎根理论、文本处理、中文分词等方法对60份收集到的报告进行了文本挖掘,得到68个主要原因、17个次要原因和6个第三次原因。其次,运用灰色关联法对各因果因素的影响程度进行分析,定量确定各因果因素的重要程度并进一步细化。随后,利用Apriori算法获取事故原因的频繁项集和强关联规则,构建贝叶斯网络模型。通过敏感性分析和关键路径分析,确定了hcstafea的关键病因和关键路径。研究表明,设备与运行状态控制缺陷、设备维护与管理缺陷、不安全行为、安全管理制度与实施缺陷、安全培训缺陷这5个高灵敏度原因是hcstafea的关键原因。此外,还得出了三条引发事故的关键路径:安全管理制度及执行缺陷→安全培训缺陷→内部监管缺陷→操作程序缺陷→不安全行为;安全管理制度及执行缺陷→安全培训缺陷→设备维护管理缺陷→设备及运行状态控制缺陷;而安全管理制度及执行缺陷→安全培训缺陷→内部监管缺陷→操作程序缺陷→设备及运行状态控制缺陷。本文为有效挖掘和提取非结构化事故调查报告文本信息提供了思路,为基于数据驱动思维的危险化学品储存区事故原因识别和关键路径研究提供了视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信