Quantification of amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin in capillary plasma microsamples by LC-MS/MS

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Ana Paula Grando , Ana Carolina Fritsch , Amanda Pacheco Bondan , Carolina Weber Ferrareze , Giovana Piva Peteffi , Roberta Zilles Hahn , Ana Júlia Dossena , Juliana Raquel Raasch , Marina Venzon Antunes , Rafael Linden
{"title":"Quantification of amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin in capillary plasma microsamples by LC-MS/MS","authors":"Ana Paula Grando ,&nbsp;Ana Carolina Fritsch ,&nbsp;Amanda Pacheco Bondan ,&nbsp;Carolina Weber Ferrareze ,&nbsp;Giovana Piva Peteffi ,&nbsp;Roberta Zilles Hahn ,&nbsp;Ana Júlia Dossena ,&nbsp;Juliana Raquel Raasch ,&nbsp;Marina Venzon Antunes ,&nbsp;Rafael Linden","doi":"10.1016/j.jchromb.2025.124698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aminoglycoside antibiotics, including amikacin (AMI), gentamicin (GEN), and tobramycin (TOB), are widely used to treat infections, necessitating plasma concentration monitoring to achieve therapeutic targets and optimize patient treatment. To minimize patient discomfort, less invasive blood collection methods are desirable. Capillary blood microsampling provides an alternative to conventional venous collection, enabling the extraction of small plasma volumes via distal puncture or self-lancing devices. This study developed and validated an LC-MS/MS method for quantifying AMI, GEN, and TOB in plasma microsamples, comparing concentrations obtained from venous and capillary plasma. Capillary samples were collected using the TASSO<sup>+</sup>® device or heparinized glass capillaries. The method was validated according to ICH guidelines, demonstrating linearity of 0.5–50 mg/L for GEN and 1.0–100 mg/L for AMI and TOB, with extraction efficiencies exceeding 85 % for all analytes. Accuracy ranged from 94.9 % to 108.1 %, with precision between 1.04 % and 5.62 %, and matrix effects of 5.5 % to 20.5 %. A total of 23 paired venous and capillary plasma samples were analyzed, with Passing-Bablok regression revealing strong agreement between venous and capillary plasma concentrations for AMI (<em>r</em> = 0.980, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001) and GEN (<em>r</em> = 0.979, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). These findings suggest that capillary microsampling is a viable and clinically applicable alternative for therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography B","volume":"1263 ","pages":"Article 124698"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography B","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570023225002521","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aminoglycoside antibiotics, including amikacin (AMI), gentamicin (GEN), and tobramycin (TOB), are widely used to treat infections, necessitating plasma concentration monitoring to achieve therapeutic targets and optimize patient treatment. To minimize patient discomfort, less invasive blood collection methods are desirable. Capillary blood microsampling provides an alternative to conventional venous collection, enabling the extraction of small plasma volumes via distal puncture or self-lancing devices. This study developed and validated an LC-MS/MS method for quantifying AMI, GEN, and TOB in plasma microsamples, comparing concentrations obtained from venous and capillary plasma. Capillary samples were collected using the TASSO+® device or heparinized glass capillaries. The method was validated according to ICH guidelines, demonstrating linearity of 0.5–50 mg/L for GEN and 1.0–100 mg/L for AMI and TOB, with extraction efficiencies exceeding 85 % for all analytes. Accuracy ranged from 94.9 % to 108.1 %, with precision between 1.04 % and 5.62 %, and matrix effects of 5.5 % to 20.5 %. A total of 23 paired venous and capillary plasma samples were analyzed, with Passing-Bablok regression revealing strong agreement between venous and capillary plasma concentrations for AMI (r = 0.980, P < 0.0001) and GEN (r = 0.979, P < 0.0001). These findings suggest that capillary microsampling is a viable and clinically applicable alternative for therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides.
LC-MS/MS定量毛细管血浆微量样品中阿米卡星、庆大霉素和妥布霉素的含量
氨基糖苷类抗生素包括阿米卡星(AMI)、庆大霉素(GEN)、妥布霉素(TOB)等广泛用于治疗感染,需要进行血药浓度监测以达到治疗目标并优化患者治疗。为了尽量减少患者的不适,需要采用侵入性较小的采血方法。毛细管血液显微采样提供了传统静脉采集的替代方法,可以通过远端穿刺或自穿刺装置提取小体积血浆。本研究开发并验证了一种LC-MS/MS方法,用于定量血浆微样品中的AMI、GEN和TOB,并比较了从静脉和毛细血管血浆中获得的浓度。毛细管样品采用TASSO+®装置或肝素化玻璃毛细管采集。根据ICH指南对该方法进行了验证,证明GEN为0.5-50 mg/L, AMI和TOB为1.0-100 mg/L的线性关系,所有分析物的提取效率均超过85%。准确度为94.9% ~ 108.1%,精密度为1.04% ~ 5.62%,基质效应为5.5% ~ 20.5%。共分析了23对静脉和毛细血管血浆样本,通过passin - bablok回归分析显示AMI的静脉和毛细血管血浆浓度具有很强的一致性(r = 0.980, P <;0.0001)和GEN (r = 0.979, P <;0.0001)。这些结果表明,毛细管微采样是一种可行的和临床适用的替代治疗药物监测氨基糖苷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chromatography B
Journal of Chromatography B 医学-分析化学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
306
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatography B publishes papers on developments in separation science relevant to biology and biomedical research including both fundamental advances and applications. Analytical techniques which may be considered include the various facets of chromatography, electrophoresis and related methods, affinity and immunoaffinity-based methodologies, hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, and microanalytical approaches. The journal also considers articles reporting developments in sample preparation, detection techniques including mass spectrometry, and data handling and analysis. Developments related to preparative separations for the isolation and purification of components of biological systems may be published, including chromatographic and electrophoretic methods, affinity separations, field flow fractionation and other preparative approaches. Applications to the analysis of biological systems and samples will be considered when the analytical science contains a significant element of novelty, e.g. a new approach to the separation of a compound, novel combination of analytical techniques, or significantly improved analytical performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信