Juma W. Yabeja , Mkabwa L.K. Manoko , Rudolph R. Shirima , James P. Legg
{"title":"Farmer knowledge of cassava brown streak and cassava mosaic diseases in Tanzania","authors":"Juma W. Yabeja , Mkabwa L.K. Manoko , Rudolph R. Shirima , James P. Legg","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The virus diseases – cassava mosaic disease (CMD) and cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) – are the most important biotic constraints to cassava production in Tanzania. They are being addressed through the dissemination of improved cassava varieties through a formalized seed (= planting material) system. For this to succeed, however, it is essential that producers of cassava seed and roots can recognize and manage the diseases. A baseline study was therefore conducted to assess farmer knowledge of CBSD and CMD in north-western and southern Tanzania. Sixty farmers were interviewed to assess their knowledge and understanding of cassava diseases. All 60 farmers were aware of the symptoms of CBSD and CMD, although few knew their names. Most use a variety of local names for these diseases, such as cassava fever, cassava fog, or other local language names that refer to other pests and diseases. None of the farmers knew the cause of CBSD, although one farmer was aware that viruses cause CMD. Most farmers had no suggestion about how these diseases spread, although some associated spread with harvesting tools (1.7 %) or drought (3.4 %). Most farmers had not received information about CMD or CBSD from any source. Information sources that were reported were extension services and cassava seed producers. The majority (>71 %) of the interviewed farmers did report selecting vigorous plants for planting material in the hope of minimizing negative impacts of diseases. When choosing varieties, farmers selection criteria, in order of importance were: high yield, sweetness, storability, disease resistance, and accessibility. More than 80 % of farmers met their seed requirements by recycling material either from their own or neighbours’ plots, while 17 % sourced improved varieties obtained from seed producers. Farmers reported recycling their saved seed for an average of 7.9 years. Of the farmers who had previously grown improved varieties, 14.3 % had returned to growing local varieties primarily due to marketing challenges, but 85.7 % continued to grow the improved material. Overall, these results highlight continued weaknesses in farmer knowledge and understanding of cassava virus diseases and their associated crop losses, as well as limited recognition of the benefits of high-quality certified planting material of improved varieties. This emphasizes the need for further farmer awareness creation through training and provision of extension advice as well as strengthened efforts by cassava breeders to develop varieties that combine virus disease resistance with the other key traits demanded by farmers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425002005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The virus diseases – cassava mosaic disease (CMD) and cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) – are the most important biotic constraints to cassava production in Tanzania. They are being addressed through the dissemination of improved cassava varieties through a formalized seed (= planting material) system. For this to succeed, however, it is essential that producers of cassava seed and roots can recognize and manage the diseases. A baseline study was therefore conducted to assess farmer knowledge of CBSD and CMD in north-western and southern Tanzania. Sixty farmers were interviewed to assess their knowledge and understanding of cassava diseases. All 60 farmers were aware of the symptoms of CBSD and CMD, although few knew their names. Most use a variety of local names for these diseases, such as cassava fever, cassava fog, or other local language names that refer to other pests and diseases. None of the farmers knew the cause of CBSD, although one farmer was aware that viruses cause CMD. Most farmers had no suggestion about how these diseases spread, although some associated spread with harvesting tools (1.7 %) or drought (3.4 %). Most farmers had not received information about CMD or CBSD from any source. Information sources that were reported were extension services and cassava seed producers. The majority (>71 %) of the interviewed farmers did report selecting vigorous plants for planting material in the hope of minimizing negative impacts of diseases. When choosing varieties, farmers selection criteria, in order of importance were: high yield, sweetness, storability, disease resistance, and accessibility. More than 80 % of farmers met their seed requirements by recycling material either from their own or neighbours’ plots, while 17 % sourced improved varieties obtained from seed producers. Farmers reported recycling their saved seed for an average of 7.9 years. Of the farmers who had previously grown improved varieties, 14.3 % had returned to growing local varieties primarily due to marketing challenges, but 85.7 % continued to grow the improved material. Overall, these results highlight continued weaknesses in farmer knowledge and understanding of cassava virus diseases and their associated crop losses, as well as limited recognition of the benefits of high-quality certified planting material of improved varieties. This emphasizes the need for further farmer awareness creation through training and provision of extension advice as well as strengthened efforts by cassava breeders to develop varieties that combine virus disease resistance with the other key traits demanded by farmers.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.