Valeria Sánchez Huerta MD , Hugo Quiroz-Mercado MD , Enrique O. Graue-Hernández MD, MSc , Alejandro Navas MD, MSc , Spencer Alford PhD , Darius Kharabi JD, MBA , Stephen Pflugfelder MD
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of a Mesenchymal Stem Cell Secretome Therapy (KPI-012) for Persistent Corneal Epithelial Defects: A Phase 1b Trial","authors":"Valeria Sánchez Huerta MD , Hugo Quiroz-Mercado MD , Enrique O. Graue-Hernández MD, MSc , Alejandro Navas MD, MSc , Spencer Alford PhD , Darius Kharabi JD, MBA , Stephen Pflugfelder MD","doi":"10.1016/j.curtheres.2025.100799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Persistent corneal epithelial defect (PCED) is a condition often refractory to conventional treatments. KPI-012 is a topical mesenchymal stem cell secretome therapy under investigation for PCED management.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the safety, tolerability, and corneal wound healing efficacy of KPI-012 in a phase 1b, proof-of-concept, open-label, single-arm clinical trial.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The safety profile and tolerability of topical self-administered KPI-012 therapy (twice daily, 1-week duration) were first evaluated in an initial safety cohort of participants with pre-existing permanent vision loss and no active corneal disease (n = 3). The safety profile and efficacy of KPI-012 were then assessed in participants with PCED of several etiologies (n = 9), who self-administered KPI-012 twice daily for up to 4 weeks with one participant self-administering for 8 weeks (efficacy cohort).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>KPI-012 was well tolerated in both the safety profile and efficacy cohorts. In the efficacy cohort (n = 9), 6 of 8 participants (75%) demonstrated complete healing of the lesion during the treatment period, with 4 of 8 (50%) achieving complete healing within 1 week of commencing KPI-012 therapy (a nontreatment-related adverse event meant 1 participant was withdrawn by the investigator). KPI-012 was well tolerated, with only 1 participant experiencing treatment-related adverse events. In patients who reported PCED-related ocular pain at baseline (n = 7), pain levels decreased in all participants after 1 week, and after 3 weeks, no participant reported ocular pain.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results from this small phase 1b open-label trial suggest that in participants with PCED of multiple etiologic origin, twice daily KPI-012 therapy exhibits a favorable safety profile-efficacy profile and may promote rapid wound healing. The small sample size limits the generalizability of the findings, and thus a later-phase clinical investigation with a larger sample size is warranted to establish the statistically driven therapeutic effect.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10920,"journal":{"name":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 100799"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011393X25000244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Persistent corneal epithelial defect (PCED) is a condition often refractory to conventional treatments. KPI-012 is a topical mesenchymal stem cell secretome therapy under investigation for PCED management.
Objective
To assess the safety, tolerability, and corneal wound healing efficacy of KPI-012 in a phase 1b, proof-of-concept, open-label, single-arm clinical trial.
Methods
The safety profile and tolerability of topical self-administered KPI-012 therapy (twice daily, 1-week duration) were first evaluated in an initial safety cohort of participants with pre-existing permanent vision loss and no active corneal disease (n = 3). The safety profile and efficacy of KPI-012 were then assessed in participants with PCED of several etiologies (n = 9), who self-administered KPI-012 twice daily for up to 4 weeks with one participant self-administering for 8 weeks (efficacy cohort).
Results
KPI-012 was well tolerated in both the safety profile and efficacy cohorts. In the efficacy cohort (n = 9), 6 of 8 participants (75%) demonstrated complete healing of the lesion during the treatment period, with 4 of 8 (50%) achieving complete healing within 1 week of commencing KPI-012 therapy (a nontreatment-related adverse event meant 1 participant was withdrawn by the investigator). KPI-012 was well tolerated, with only 1 participant experiencing treatment-related adverse events. In patients who reported PCED-related ocular pain at baseline (n = 7), pain levels decreased in all participants after 1 week, and after 3 weeks, no participant reported ocular pain.
Conclusions
The results from this small phase 1b open-label trial suggest that in participants with PCED of multiple etiologic origin, twice daily KPI-012 therapy exhibits a favorable safety profile-efficacy profile and may promote rapid wound healing. The small sample size limits the generalizability of the findings, and thus a later-phase clinical investigation with a larger sample size is warranted to establish the statistically driven therapeutic effect.
期刊介绍:
We also encourage the submission of manuscripts presenting preclinical and very preliminary research that may stimulate further investigation of potentially relevant findings, as well as in-depth review articles on specific therapies or disease states, and applied health delivery or pharmacoeconomics.
CTR encourages and supports the submission of manuscripts describing:
• Interventions designed to understand or improve human health, disease treatment or disease prevention;
• Studies that focus on problems that are uncommon in resource-rich countries;
• Research that is "under-published" because of limited access to monetary resources such as English language support and Open Access fees (CTR offers deeply discounted English language editing);
• Republication of articles previously published in non-English journals (eg, evidence-based guidelines) which could be useful if translated into English;
• Preclinical and clinical product development studies that are not pursued for further investigation based upon early phase results.