Leticia Delgado Borges , Gabor József Barton , Silvio Antonio Garbelotti Junior , Fabiano Politti , Cintia Lopes Ferreira , Paulo Roberto Garcia Lucareli
{"title":"Task-specific differentiation of patellofemoral pain in women using a neural network analysis of joint angle subsets","authors":"Leticia Delgado Borges , Gabor József Barton , Silvio Antonio Garbelotti Junior , Fabiano Politti , Cintia Lopes Ferreira , Paulo Roberto Garcia Lucareli","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP) present mechanical disorders during functional tests and activities. Studies often evaluate this population to understand the relationship between mechanical factors and pain/malalignment.</div><div>This study aimed to identify how different groupings of kinematic variables can differentiate asymptomatic women from women with PFP in various functional tasks.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty-five women with PFP and thirty-five women without PFP underwent three-dimensional kinematic evaluation of seven functional tasks. All were physically active and aged between 18 and 30 years old. Seven kinematic variables were selected and grouped into four sets for each task and group (PFP and control): Proximal, Local, Distal and Malalignment. The kinematic sets differentiate the groups using the neural network-based Movement Deviation Profile (MDP). To compare the magnitude of the MDP results of the variable sets, Z-scores were used, expressing the MDP results in units of standard deviation of the control group after mean correction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The most discriminative sets varied by task. The Distal set best separated the groups during landing, and the Proximal+Local set during propulsion. The Proximal set was most discriminative for stair ascent, while the Proximal+Distal set performed best for stair descent. Malalignment variables showed greater differences in lateral step down, forward step down, and walking.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Kinematic variable sets, alone or in combination, can distinguish women with PFP from asymptomatic individuals in a task-specific manner. Women with PFP appear to adopt adaptable movement strategies depending on the task. These findings may improve clinical assessment and guide treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"121 ","pages":"Pages 225-232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225002188","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP) present mechanical disorders during functional tests and activities. Studies often evaluate this population to understand the relationship between mechanical factors and pain/malalignment.
This study aimed to identify how different groupings of kinematic variables can differentiate asymptomatic women from women with PFP in various functional tasks.
Methods
Thirty-five women with PFP and thirty-five women without PFP underwent three-dimensional kinematic evaluation of seven functional tasks. All were physically active and aged between 18 and 30 years old. Seven kinematic variables were selected and grouped into four sets for each task and group (PFP and control): Proximal, Local, Distal and Malalignment. The kinematic sets differentiate the groups using the neural network-based Movement Deviation Profile (MDP). To compare the magnitude of the MDP results of the variable sets, Z-scores were used, expressing the MDP results in units of standard deviation of the control group after mean correction.
Results
The most discriminative sets varied by task. The Distal set best separated the groups during landing, and the Proximal+Local set during propulsion. The Proximal set was most discriminative for stair ascent, while the Proximal+Distal set performed best for stair descent. Malalignment variables showed greater differences in lateral step down, forward step down, and walking.
Conclusion
Kinematic variable sets, alone or in combination, can distinguish women with PFP from asymptomatic individuals in a task-specific manner. Women with PFP appear to adopt adaptable movement strategies depending on the task. These findings may improve clinical assessment and guide treatment.
期刊介绍:
Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance.
The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.