{"title":"Material balance and correction for the measurement of green total factor productivity growth","authors":"Haoran Yang , Qiu Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the measurement of the growth of green total factor productivity (GTFP), existing studies firstly need to measure environmental efficiency, where undesirable outputs are estimated based on the quantity of inputs using the material balance method. The material balance method not only makes it possible to derive undesirable outputs but also implies a constraint. However, existing studies have not considered this potential constraint when measuring environmental efficiency, which may result in GTFP growth measurements that violate the material balance principle. This paper improves the measurement of the growth rate of GTFP by incorporating material balance constraints into the environmental efficiency measurement method. Based on green cost function, a new method which is consistent with material balance constraints for measuring the GTFP growth rate is constructed. Empirical measurement of the growth of GTFP in power generation enterprises from 2009 to 2014 reveals that, without considering material balance constraints, the traditional GTFP growth measurement results do not align with the trends in the unit energy consumption of power generation enterprises. This discrepancy is corrected when material balance constraints are incorporated. The GTFP growth results based on the environmental cost function indicate that power generation enterprises focus more on improving cost efficiency rather than merely enhancing technical efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 108647"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325004748","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the measurement of the growth of green total factor productivity (GTFP), existing studies firstly need to measure environmental efficiency, where undesirable outputs are estimated based on the quantity of inputs using the material balance method. The material balance method not only makes it possible to derive undesirable outputs but also implies a constraint. However, existing studies have not considered this potential constraint when measuring environmental efficiency, which may result in GTFP growth measurements that violate the material balance principle. This paper improves the measurement of the growth rate of GTFP by incorporating material balance constraints into the environmental efficiency measurement method. Based on green cost function, a new method which is consistent with material balance constraints for measuring the GTFP growth rate is constructed. Empirical measurement of the growth of GTFP in power generation enterprises from 2009 to 2014 reveals that, without considering material balance constraints, the traditional GTFP growth measurement results do not align with the trends in the unit energy consumption of power generation enterprises. This discrepancy is corrected when material balance constraints are incorporated. The GTFP growth results based on the environmental cost function indicate that power generation enterprises focus more on improving cost efficiency rather than merely enhancing technical efficiency.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.