The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the hiring process: Job applicants’ perceptions of procedural justice

IF 5.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Md Sajjad Hosain , Mohammad Bin Amin , Gouranga Chandra Debnath , Md Atikur Rahaman
{"title":"The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the hiring process: Job applicants’ perceptions of procedural justice","authors":"Md Sajjad Hosain ,&nbsp;Mohammad Bin Amin ,&nbsp;Gouranga Chandra Debnath ,&nbsp;Md Atikur Rahaman","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) for hiring is becoming a common practice among the employers. However, there is a lack of empirical evidence in academia about how job applicants react to such utilization. In this empirical study, we tried to investigate the relationship between perceived (by job applicants) use of AI in the hiring process (PUAHP) and job applicants’ perceived procedural justice (PPJ) using an extension of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as mediators [perceived ease of use (PEU), perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived trust (PT)]. The study was conducted based on primary data collected from 418 job applicants in Bangladesh. We used SPSS 26 for descriptive statistics and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) through SmartPLS 4.0. The study identified that, first of all, PUAHP has a significant positive relationship with the dependent variable, PPJ. Second, PUAHP was also found to be significantly correlated with all three mediators (PEU, PU and PT). Third, PEU, PU and PT were identified to have significant positive relationships with PPJ. Finally, regarding the mediating effects, we found that all three mediators partially mediated the relationship between PUAHP and PPJ. Although, there are sufficient empirical studies that have focused on the use of AI in the hiring process, comparatively less attention has been put so far particularly on job applicants' percpetions of such an use of AI in the hiring process. Therefore, this study can add value to the existing knowledge by reducing such lacking. Moreover, we used three components of the extended TAM as mediators which is an unique effort in academia. Furthermore, the study was conducted based on primary responses in an emerging economy which is also rare in academia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100713"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825001289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) for hiring is becoming a common practice among the employers. However, there is a lack of empirical evidence in academia about how job applicants react to such utilization. In this empirical study, we tried to investigate the relationship between perceived (by job applicants) use of AI in the hiring process (PUAHP) and job applicants’ perceived procedural justice (PPJ) using an extension of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as mediators [perceived ease of use (PEU), perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived trust (PT)]. The study was conducted based on primary data collected from 418 job applicants in Bangladesh. We used SPSS 26 for descriptive statistics and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) through SmartPLS 4.0. The study identified that, first of all, PUAHP has a significant positive relationship with the dependent variable, PPJ. Second, PUAHP was also found to be significantly correlated with all three mediators (PEU, PU and PT). Third, PEU, PU and PT were identified to have significant positive relationships with PPJ. Finally, regarding the mediating effects, we found that all three mediators partially mediated the relationship between PUAHP and PPJ. Although, there are sufficient empirical studies that have focused on the use of AI in the hiring process, comparatively less attention has been put so far particularly on job applicants' percpetions of such an use of AI in the hiring process. Therefore, this study can add value to the existing knowledge by reducing such lacking. Moreover, we used three components of the extended TAM as mediators which is an unique effort in academia. Furthermore, the study was conducted based on primary responses in an emerging economy which is also rare in academia.
人工智能(AI)在招聘过程中的应用:求职者对程序公正的看法
使用人工智能(AI)进行招聘正在成为雇主们的普遍做法。然而,学术界缺乏关于求职者对这种利用的反应的经验证据。在本实证研究中,我们试图通过扩展技术接受模型(TAM)作为中介[感知易用性(PEU),感知有用性(PU)和感知信任(PT)]来调查(求职者)在招聘过程中感知AI使用(PUAHP)与求职者感知程序正义(PPJ)之间的关系。这项研究是根据从孟加拉国418名求职者那里收集的原始数据进行的。我们使用SPSS 26进行描述性统计,并通过SmartPLS 4.0进行偏最小二乘结构方程建模(PLS-SEM)。研究发现,首先,PUAHP与因变量PPJ呈显著正相关。其次,PUAHP也被发现与所有三种中介(PEU, PU和PT)显著相关。第三,PEU、PU和PT与PPJ呈显著正相关。最后,在中介作用方面,我们发现这三种介质都部分介导了PUAHP与PPJ之间的关系。尽管有足够的实证研究关注人工智能在招聘过程中的使用,但迄今为止,人们对求职者在招聘过程中使用人工智能的看法的关注相对较少。因此,本研究可以通过减少这些不足来增加现有知识的价值。此外,我们使用了扩展TAM的三个组成部分作为中介,这在学术界是一个独特的努力。此外,该研究是基于新兴经济体的初步反应进行的,这在学术界也是罕见的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信