Cory J. Butz , Anders L. Madsen , Jhonatan S. Oliveira
{"title":"On Fast arc-reversal","authors":"Cory J. Butz , Anders L. Madsen , Jhonatan S. Oliveira","doi":"10.1016/j.ijar.2025.109488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Fast arc-reversal</em> (FAR) was recently proposed as a new exact inference algorithm in discrete <em>Bayesian networks</em> (BNs), merging favourable features of <em>Arc-reversal</em> (AR) and <em>Variable elimination</em> (VE). AR constantly maintains a sub-BN structure when rendering a variable barren via arc reversals, often requiring more computational effort than VE, which sacrifices a sub-BN structure by directly eliminating a variable. It was formally established that FAR can <em>recover</em> a unique and sound sub-BN structure after consecutive variable eliminations. Experimental results on real-world benchmark networks empirically show an improvement in the average run-time and variance of FAR compared to AR. A novel method, called <em>d-contraction</em>, was suggested for graphically understanding FAR since FAR is not always the same as a sequence of arc reversals. Here, we extend this work by formally establishing that AR's sub-DAG is necessarily contained within FAR's sub-DAG. Unfortunately, neither FAR nor AR can guarantee the construction of minimal I-maps, although both methods may subsequently recover minimal I-mapness. Finally, it is shown how FAR improves Sum-Product network interpretability by relaxing a restriction on the elimination ordering used.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13842,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 109488"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Approximate Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888613X2500129X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fast arc-reversal (FAR) was recently proposed as a new exact inference algorithm in discrete Bayesian networks (BNs), merging favourable features of Arc-reversal (AR) and Variable elimination (VE). AR constantly maintains a sub-BN structure when rendering a variable barren via arc reversals, often requiring more computational effort than VE, which sacrifices a sub-BN structure by directly eliminating a variable. It was formally established that FAR can recover a unique and sound sub-BN structure after consecutive variable eliminations. Experimental results on real-world benchmark networks empirically show an improvement in the average run-time and variance of FAR compared to AR. A novel method, called d-contraction, was suggested for graphically understanding FAR since FAR is not always the same as a sequence of arc reversals. Here, we extend this work by formally establishing that AR's sub-DAG is necessarily contained within FAR's sub-DAG. Unfortunately, neither FAR nor AR can guarantee the construction of minimal I-maps, although both methods may subsequently recover minimal I-mapness. Finally, it is shown how FAR improves Sum-Product network interpretability by relaxing a restriction on the elimination ordering used.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Approximate Reasoning is intended to serve as a forum for the treatment of imprecision and uncertainty in Artificial and Computational Intelligence, covering both the foundations of uncertainty theories, and the design of intelligent systems for scientific and engineering applications. It publishes high-quality research papers describing theoretical developments or innovative applications, as well as review articles on topics of general interest.
Relevant topics include, but are not limited to, probabilistic reasoning and Bayesian networks, imprecise probabilities, random sets, belief functions (Dempster-Shafer theory), possibility theory, fuzzy sets, rough sets, decision theory, non-additive measures and integrals, qualitative reasoning about uncertainty, comparative probability orderings, game-theoretic probability, default reasoning, nonstandard logics, argumentation systems, inconsistency tolerant reasoning, elicitation techniques, philosophical foundations and psychological models of uncertain reasoning.
Domains of application for uncertain reasoning systems include risk analysis and assessment, information retrieval and database design, information fusion, machine learning, data and web mining, computer vision, image and signal processing, intelligent data analysis, statistics, multi-agent systems, etc.