Integrating BiLSTM-multi-head attention model for eco-compensation allocation and prediction in transboundary watersheds

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Fengqi Guo , Linru Hao , Chunhua Xin
{"title":"Integrating BiLSTM-multi-head attention model for eco-compensation allocation and prediction in transboundary watersheds","authors":"Fengqi Guo ,&nbsp;Linru Hao ,&nbsp;Chunhua Xin","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The successful implementation of ecological compensation hinges on the establishment of reasonable compensation standards. This study develops a two-stage compensation standard allocation model and an ecosystem service value prediction model using an optimized BiLSTM-Multi-head Attention method. Based on the total cost, the standards are allocated across districts within the Yongding River Basin according to the revised ecosystem service values (ESV) from 2009 to 2020, with a prediction for 2021. The results show that the direct costs of comprehensive management in the Yongding River Basin amount to 362.21 million yuan, while the indirect costs reach 1725.52 million yuan, resulting in a total cost of 2087.73 million yuan. Upon allocation based on the revised ESV, the upstream areas primarily receive compensation, while downstream areas are the main payers. This trend has become increasingly pronounced since the initiation of collaborative management in 2016, with downstream areas facing increasing compensation burdens. Specifically, the average annual compensation burden of Tianjin's districts has risen from 6.39 million yuan in 2016 to 8.99 million yuan in 2020, and is predicted to be 9.05 million yuan in 2021. This trend is associated with the further development of Tianjin's economic functions and indicates intensified local ecological pressures. Coupled with the decline of ESV in downstream, it underscores the necessity to prioritize the preservation of ecological conservation areas. A market-oriented mechanism to realize the value of ecological products within the basin is also suggested to enhance the ecological benefits for ecosystem service providers and alleviate the burden on compensators. Moreover, the constructed systematic approach balances fairness and efficiency, leveraging collaborative management and enhancing overall sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 107701"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001910","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The successful implementation of ecological compensation hinges on the establishment of reasonable compensation standards. This study develops a two-stage compensation standard allocation model and an ecosystem service value prediction model using an optimized BiLSTM-Multi-head Attention method. Based on the total cost, the standards are allocated across districts within the Yongding River Basin according to the revised ecosystem service values (ESV) from 2009 to 2020, with a prediction for 2021. The results show that the direct costs of comprehensive management in the Yongding River Basin amount to 362.21 million yuan, while the indirect costs reach 1725.52 million yuan, resulting in a total cost of 2087.73 million yuan. Upon allocation based on the revised ESV, the upstream areas primarily receive compensation, while downstream areas are the main payers. This trend has become increasingly pronounced since the initiation of collaborative management in 2016, with downstream areas facing increasing compensation burdens. Specifically, the average annual compensation burden of Tianjin's districts has risen from 6.39 million yuan in 2016 to 8.99 million yuan in 2020, and is predicted to be 9.05 million yuan in 2021. This trend is associated with the further development of Tianjin's economic functions and indicates intensified local ecological pressures. Coupled with the decline of ESV in downstream, it underscores the necessity to prioritize the preservation of ecological conservation areas. A market-oriented mechanism to realize the value of ecological products within the basin is also suggested to enhance the ecological benefits for ecosystem service providers and alleviate the burden on compensators. Moreover, the constructed systematic approach balances fairness and efficiency, leveraging collaborative management and enhancing overall sustainability.

Abstract Image

基于bilstm -多头关注模型的跨界流域生态补偿分配与预测
生态补偿的成功实施,关键在于建立合理的补偿标准。本文采用优化的bilstm -多头关注法建立了两阶段补偿标准分配模型和生态系统服务价值预测模型。在总成本的基础上,根据2009 - 2020年修订后的生态系统服务价值(ESV)在永定河流域内进行了区际分配,并对2021年进行了预测。结果表明,永定河流域综合治理的直接成本为3.6221亿元,间接成本为172552亿元,总成本为208773万元。根据修订后的ESV进行分配时,上游地区主要获得补偿,下游地区是主要的支付者。自2016年启动协同管理以来,这一趋势日益明显,下游地区面临的补偿负担越来越重。具体而言,天津市各区的年平均薪酬负担已从2016年的639万元上升到2020年的899万元,预计2021年将达到905万元。这一趋势与天津经济功能的进一步发展有关,表明当地生态压力加剧。再加上下游ESV的下降,凸显了优先保护生态涵养区的必要性。建议建立以市场为导向的流域生态产品价值实现机制,以提高生态服务提供者的生态效益,减轻补偿者的负担。此外,构建的系统方法平衡了公平和效率,利用协作管理和增强整体可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信