Assessing the soil organic carbon stability and greenhouse gases mitigation in rice-wheat system: Seventeen-years assessment of tillage and residue management

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Ram K. Fagodiya , Kamlesh Verma , Gargi Sharma , Arvind Kumar Rai , Kailash Prajapat , Ranbir Singh , Parvender Sheoran , Nirmalendu Basak , Priyanka Chandra , D.P. Sharma , R.K. Yadav , A.K. Biswas
{"title":"Assessing the soil organic carbon stability and greenhouse gases mitigation in rice-wheat system: Seventeen-years assessment of tillage and residue management","authors":"Ram K. Fagodiya ,&nbsp;Kamlesh Verma ,&nbsp;Gargi Sharma ,&nbsp;Arvind Kumar Rai ,&nbsp;Kailash Prajapat ,&nbsp;Ranbir Singh ,&nbsp;Parvender Sheoran ,&nbsp;Nirmalendu Basak ,&nbsp;Priyanka Chandra ,&nbsp;D.P. Sharma ,&nbsp;R.K. Yadav ,&nbsp;A.K. Biswas","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the rice-wheat system (RWS), various management strategies have been explored. Long-term field experiments are particularly effective in directly comparing these strategies. We analyzed a 17-year field experiment focusing on crop establishment, conservation tillage, and residue management (CTRM) in the western Indo-Gangetic plains of India, a region highly impacted by crop residue burning and GHG emissions for its impacts on carbon sequestration, stability, and GHG mitigation in rice-wheat system. These findings have significant implications for sustainable agricultural practices in regions facing similar environmental challenges. The experiment included five scenarios: (a) Sc-1: Puddled transplanted rice (PTR) – conventionally tilled wheat (CTW); (2) Sc-2: Reduced-tillage direct-seeded rice (RTDSR) – reduced-tillage wheat (RTW); (3) Sc-3: RTDSR-RTW with one-third residue incorporation; (4); Sc-4: Zero-tillage direct-seeded rice (ZTDSR) – zero-tillage wheat (ZTW); (5) Sc-5: ZTDSR-ZTW with one-third residue retention (RR). Our analysis showed that CTRM significantly enhanced soil organic carbon (SOC) stock (by 11.41–17.28 %) and carbon sequestration (by 35.12–86.63 %) compared to conventional practice (Sc-1). Among all the scenarios, Sc-5 (ZTDSR-ZTW + RR) achieved the highest carbon management index (CMI: 150.56 and 188.11) across both the soil layers, indicating a reduced need for carbon management due to higher TOC (10.59 and 10.07 g kg<sup>−1</sup>) compared to Sc-1. The highest net GHG emissions were observed in PTR/CTW (Sc-1), while Sc-5 recorded the lowest emissions, with 84.07 % reduction compared to Sc-1. Carbon footprints decreased progressively with reduction in tillage intensity and residue incorporation. This study highlights that reduced or zero tillage combined with residue retention in RWS holds substantial potential for increasing carbon sequestration, reducing net GHG emissions, and lowering carbon footprints. Additionally, this practice offers an alternative to crop residue burning, a significant contributor to air pollution in the western IGP, particularly in Punjab and Haryana, India.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 106697"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016719872500251X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the rice-wheat system (RWS), various management strategies have been explored. Long-term field experiments are particularly effective in directly comparing these strategies. We analyzed a 17-year field experiment focusing on crop establishment, conservation tillage, and residue management (CTRM) in the western Indo-Gangetic plains of India, a region highly impacted by crop residue burning and GHG emissions for its impacts on carbon sequestration, stability, and GHG mitigation in rice-wheat system. These findings have significant implications for sustainable agricultural practices in regions facing similar environmental challenges. The experiment included five scenarios: (a) Sc-1: Puddled transplanted rice (PTR) – conventionally tilled wheat (CTW); (2) Sc-2: Reduced-tillage direct-seeded rice (RTDSR) – reduced-tillage wheat (RTW); (3) Sc-3: RTDSR-RTW with one-third residue incorporation; (4); Sc-4: Zero-tillage direct-seeded rice (ZTDSR) – zero-tillage wheat (ZTW); (5) Sc-5: ZTDSR-ZTW with one-third residue retention (RR). Our analysis showed that CTRM significantly enhanced soil organic carbon (SOC) stock (by 11.41–17.28 %) and carbon sequestration (by 35.12–86.63 %) compared to conventional practice (Sc-1). Among all the scenarios, Sc-5 (ZTDSR-ZTW + RR) achieved the highest carbon management index (CMI: 150.56 and 188.11) across both the soil layers, indicating a reduced need for carbon management due to higher TOC (10.59 and 10.07 g kg−1) compared to Sc-1. The highest net GHG emissions were observed in PTR/CTW (Sc-1), while Sc-5 recorded the lowest emissions, with 84.07 % reduction compared to Sc-1. Carbon footprints decreased progressively with reduction in tillage intensity and residue incorporation. This study highlights that reduced or zero tillage combined with residue retention in RWS holds substantial potential for increasing carbon sequestration, reducing net GHG emissions, and lowering carbon footprints. Additionally, this practice offers an alternative to crop residue burning, a significant contributor to air pollution in the western IGP, particularly in Punjab and Haryana, India.
水稻-小麦系统土壤有机碳稳定性及温室气体减排评估:17年耕作与秸秆管理评估
为了减少稻麦系统(RWS)的温室气体(GHG)排放,人们探索了各种管理策略。长期的实地试验在直接比较这些策略方面特别有效。我们分析了印度西部印度恒河平原17年的作物种植、保护性耕作和秸秆管理(CTRM)的田间试验,该地区受到作物秸秆燃烧和温室气体排放的严重影响,对水稻-小麦系统的碳固存、稳定性和温室气体减排的影响。这些发现对面临类似环境挑战的地区的可持续农业实践具有重要意义。试验包括5个试验情景:(a) Sc-1:水坑移栽水稻(PTR) -常规耕作小麦(CTW);(2) Sc-2:免耕直播水稻(RTDSR) -免耕小麦(RTW);(3) Sc-3:加入三分之一残渣的RTDSR-RTW;(4);Sc-4:免耕直播水稻(ZTDSR) -免耕小麦(ZTW);(5) Sc-5: ZTDSR-ZTW,残余保留率为1 / 3。结果表明,与常规做法(Sc-1)相比,CTRM显著提高了土壤有机碳储量(11.41 ~ 17.28 %)和固碳量(35.12 ~ 86.63 %)。在所有情景中,Sc-5 (ZTDSR-ZTW + RR)在两个土层的碳管理指数最高(CMI分别为150.56和188.11),表明与Sc-1相比,Sc-5的TOC含量较高(10.59和10.07 g kg−1),减少了碳管理需求。PTR/CTW (Sc-1)的温室气体净排放量最高,而Sc-5的排放量最低,与Sc-1相比减少了84.07 %。碳足迹随耕作强度和秸秆掺入量的减少而逐渐减少。这项研究强调,在RWS中减少或零耕作与残留物保留相结合,在增加碳固存、减少温室气体净排放和降低碳足迹方面具有巨大的潜力。此外,这种做法提供了一种替代作物秸秆焚烧的方法,而秸秆焚烧是造成印度西部,特别是旁遮普邦和哈里亚纳邦空气污染的一个重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信