Natalie Krug, Chaimae Chettouh, Jan-Christoph Zarges, Hans-Peter Heim
{"title":"Validation of real-time aging simulation of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) using accelerated aging in accordance with ASTM F1980","authors":"Natalie Krug, Chaimae Chettouh, Jan-Christoph Zarges, Hans-Peter Heim","doi":"10.1016/j.polymertesting.2025.108880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To advance the application of bio-based materials in medical technology, further research is required to assess their long-term performance. In common practice, accelerated aging tests based on ASTM F1980 are used in medical contexts to predict material behavior over time. This standard provides calculation guidelines to determine the equivalent storage duration under artificially accelerated aging conditions using a Q<sub>10</sub>-factor. This factor, typically assumed to be 2, represents the increase in reaction rate due to elevated temperatures.</div><div>In this study, a comparison was conducted between accelerated aged samples and their real-time equivalents using various PLA types. The results indicate that the standard assumption of Q<sub>10</sub> = 2 can lead to an overestimation of degradation, resulting in a misrepresentation of real-time aging behavior. This discrepancy is substantiated by experimental data, including mechanical, thermal, and chemical analyses. A key factor contributing to this deviation appears to be the reliance on overly simplistic assumptions regarding degradation kinetics, which fail to account for autocatalytic reactions and the inherently multi-stage nature of the degradation process. In the present study, this observation was further corroborated through the determination of material-specific Q<sub>10</sub>-factors. These factors, found to range between 2.3 and 2.5, exhibited dynamic variations throughout the degradation process, highlighting the need for a refined approach to accelerated aging methodologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20628,"journal":{"name":"Polymer Testing","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 108880"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polymer Testing","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142941825001941","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To advance the application of bio-based materials in medical technology, further research is required to assess their long-term performance. In common practice, accelerated aging tests based on ASTM F1980 are used in medical contexts to predict material behavior over time. This standard provides calculation guidelines to determine the equivalent storage duration under artificially accelerated aging conditions using a Q10-factor. This factor, typically assumed to be 2, represents the increase in reaction rate due to elevated temperatures.
In this study, a comparison was conducted between accelerated aged samples and their real-time equivalents using various PLA types. The results indicate that the standard assumption of Q10 = 2 can lead to an overestimation of degradation, resulting in a misrepresentation of real-time aging behavior. This discrepancy is substantiated by experimental data, including mechanical, thermal, and chemical analyses. A key factor contributing to this deviation appears to be the reliance on overly simplistic assumptions regarding degradation kinetics, which fail to account for autocatalytic reactions and the inherently multi-stage nature of the degradation process. In the present study, this observation was further corroborated through the determination of material-specific Q10-factors. These factors, found to range between 2.3 and 2.5, exhibited dynamic variations throughout the degradation process, highlighting the need for a refined approach to accelerated aging methodologies.
期刊介绍:
Polymer Testing focuses on the testing, analysis and characterization of polymer materials, including both synthetic and natural or biobased polymers. Novel testing methods and the testing of novel polymeric materials in bulk, solution and dispersion is covered. In addition, we welcome the submission of the testing of polymeric materials for a wide range of applications and industrial products as well as nanoscale characterization.
The scope includes but is not limited to the following main topics:
Novel testing methods and Chemical analysis
• mechanical, thermal, electrical, chemical, imaging, spectroscopy, scattering and rheology
Physical properties and behaviour of novel polymer systems
• nanoscale properties, morphology, transport properties
Degradation and recycling of polymeric materials when combined with novel testing or characterization methods
• degradation, biodegradation, ageing and fire retardancy
Modelling and Simulation work will be only considered when it is linked to new or previously published experimental results.