Validation of real-time aging simulation of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) using accelerated aging in accordance with ASTM F1980

IF 5 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING
Natalie Krug, Chaimae Chettouh, Jan-Christoph Zarges, Hans-Peter Heim
{"title":"Validation of real-time aging simulation of poly(lactic acid) (PLA) using accelerated aging in accordance with ASTM F1980","authors":"Natalie Krug,&nbsp;Chaimae Chettouh,&nbsp;Jan-Christoph Zarges,&nbsp;Hans-Peter Heim","doi":"10.1016/j.polymertesting.2025.108880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To advance the application of bio-based materials in medical technology, further research is required to assess their long-term performance. In common practice, accelerated aging tests based on ASTM F1980 are used in medical contexts to predict material behavior over time. This standard provides calculation guidelines to determine the equivalent storage duration under artificially accelerated aging conditions using a Q<sub>10</sub>-factor. This factor, typically assumed to be 2, represents the increase in reaction rate due to elevated temperatures.</div><div>In this study, a comparison was conducted between accelerated aged samples and their real-time equivalents using various PLA types. The results indicate that the standard assumption of Q<sub>10</sub> = 2 can lead to an overestimation of degradation, resulting in a misrepresentation of real-time aging behavior. This discrepancy is substantiated by experimental data, including mechanical, thermal, and chemical analyses. A key factor contributing to this deviation appears to be the reliance on overly simplistic assumptions regarding degradation kinetics, which fail to account for autocatalytic reactions and the inherently multi-stage nature of the degradation process. In the present study, this observation was further corroborated through the determination of material-specific Q<sub>10</sub>-factors. These factors, found to range between 2.3 and 2.5, exhibited dynamic variations throughout the degradation process, highlighting the need for a refined approach to accelerated aging methodologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20628,"journal":{"name":"Polymer Testing","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 108880"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polymer Testing","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142941825001941","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To advance the application of bio-based materials in medical technology, further research is required to assess their long-term performance. In common practice, accelerated aging tests based on ASTM F1980 are used in medical contexts to predict material behavior over time. This standard provides calculation guidelines to determine the equivalent storage duration under artificially accelerated aging conditions using a Q10-factor. This factor, typically assumed to be 2, represents the increase in reaction rate due to elevated temperatures.
In this study, a comparison was conducted between accelerated aged samples and their real-time equivalents using various PLA types. The results indicate that the standard assumption of Q10 = 2 can lead to an overestimation of degradation, resulting in a misrepresentation of real-time aging behavior. This discrepancy is substantiated by experimental data, including mechanical, thermal, and chemical analyses. A key factor contributing to this deviation appears to be the reliance on overly simplistic assumptions regarding degradation kinetics, which fail to account for autocatalytic reactions and the inherently multi-stage nature of the degradation process. In the present study, this observation was further corroborated through the determination of material-specific Q10-factors. These factors, found to range between 2.3 and 2.5, exhibited dynamic variations throughout the degradation process, highlighting the need for a refined approach to accelerated aging methodologies.
根据ASTM F1980使用加速老化对聚乳酸(PLA)进行实时老化模拟验证
为了推进生物基材料在医疗技术中的应用,需要进一步研究评估其长期性能。在通常的实践中,基于ASTM F1980的加速老化试验在医学环境中用于预测材料随时间的性能。本标准提供了在人工加速老化条件下使用q10因子确定等效贮存时间的计算指南。这个因子通常假定为2,表示由于温度升高而增加的反应速率。在本研究中,使用不同PLA类型的加速老化样品与其实时等效样品进行了比较。结果表明,Q10 = 2的标准假设会导致对退化的高估,从而导致对实时老化行为的错误描述。实验数据,包括力学、热学和化学分析,证实了这种差异。造成这种偏差的一个关键因素似乎是对降解动力学过于简单的假设的依赖,这些假设未能考虑到自催化反应和降解过程固有的多阶段性质。在本研究中,通过测定材料特异性q10因子进一步证实了这一观察结果。这些因子的范围在2.3到2.5之间,在整个退化过程中表现出动态变化,突出了对加速老化方法的改进方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polymer Testing
Polymer Testing 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
328
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Polymer Testing focuses on the testing, analysis and characterization of polymer materials, including both synthetic and natural or biobased polymers. Novel testing methods and the testing of novel polymeric materials in bulk, solution and dispersion is covered. In addition, we welcome the submission of the testing of polymeric materials for a wide range of applications and industrial products as well as nanoscale characterization. The scope includes but is not limited to the following main topics: Novel testing methods and Chemical analysis • mechanical, thermal, electrical, chemical, imaging, spectroscopy, scattering and rheology Physical properties and behaviour of novel polymer systems • nanoscale properties, morphology, transport properties Degradation and recycling of polymeric materials when combined with novel testing or characterization methods • degradation, biodegradation, ageing and fire retardancy Modelling and Simulation work will be only considered when it is linked to new or previously published experimental results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信