{"title":"Increased LDH Remains a Crucial Prognostic Factor in Patients With Multiple Myeloma","authors":"Ramiro Espinoza-Zamora , Nidia Paulina Zapata-Canto , Lizbeth Deyanir Aguilera-Urbina , Judith Cruz-Velazquez , Elba Reyes-Maldonado , Jorge Vela-Ojeda","doi":"10.1016/j.arcmed.2025.103239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Multiple myeloma is the second most common hematologic cancer and remains incurable. Several prognostic factors have been identified, but many are costly and inaccessible to most hematology centers. To explore the clinical, laboratory, and cytogenetic factors that influence survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The research included 286 patients treated with different regimens: 64.5 % received thalidomide-based combinations, while 35.5 % were treated with proteasome inhibitor combinations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Stringent complete remission was achieved in 15.5 %, complete remission in 30.5 %, very good partial response in 41 %, and partial response in 5 %. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were lower in patients with high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), renal disease, <em>t</em>(4;14), RB1 mutation, and in those who did not achieve complete remission or were not treated with transplantation and proteasome inhibitors. Elevated LDH was identified as the most significant independent prognostic factor. A scoring system based on LDH, renal disease, <em>t</em>(4;14), and RB1 mutation was developed and showed differences in PFS and OS based on the score (0,1,2,3, or 4,5 points).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>An elevated LDH level was the most significant prognostic factor. A simple scoring system is suggested, especially for patients without access to expensive cytogenetic testing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8318,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medical Research","volume":"56 6","pages":"Article 103239"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0188440925000591","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Aims
Multiple myeloma is the second most common hematologic cancer and remains incurable. Several prognostic factors have been identified, but many are costly and inaccessible to most hematology centers. To explore the clinical, laboratory, and cytogenetic factors that influence survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Methods
The research included 286 patients treated with different regimens: 64.5 % received thalidomide-based combinations, while 35.5 % were treated with proteasome inhibitor combinations.
Results
Stringent complete remission was achieved in 15.5 %, complete remission in 30.5 %, very good partial response in 41 %, and partial response in 5 %. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were lower in patients with high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), renal disease, t(4;14), RB1 mutation, and in those who did not achieve complete remission or were not treated with transplantation and proteasome inhibitors. Elevated LDH was identified as the most significant independent prognostic factor. A scoring system based on LDH, renal disease, t(4;14), and RB1 mutation was developed and showed differences in PFS and OS based on the score (0,1,2,3, or 4,5 points).
Conclusions
An elevated LDH level was the most significant prognostic factor. A simple scoring system is suggested, especially for patients without access to expensive cytogenetic testing.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Medical Research serves as a platform for publishing original peer-reviewed medical research, aiming to bridge gaps created by medical specialization. The journal covers three main categories - biomedical, clinical, and epidemiological contributions, along with review articles and preliminary communications. With an international scope, it presents the study of diseases from diverse perspectives, offering the medical community original investigations ranging from molecular biology to clinical epidemiology in a single publication.