The impact of operational leanness and resilience on managing geopolitical risks: The moderating role of demand uncertainty and betweenness centrality

IF 8.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Minhao Gu , Hui Wang , Yanming Zhang , Ziyue Wang
{"title":"The impact of operational leanness and resilience on managing geopolitical risks: The moderating role of demand uncertainty and betweenness centrality","authors":"Minhao Gu ,&nbsp;Hui Wang ,&nbsp;Yanming Zhang ,&nbsp;Ziyue Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.104214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The U.S.-China trade war significantly impacts global supply chain security and stability. This study delves into a particular policy enacted by the U.S. amid the U.S.-China trade war context, targeting foreign investment in China. Our focus is on examining its repercussions on the stock market of relevant high-tech industries in China, and we explore how operational leanness and operational resilience hedge the impact, as well as environmental and network factors moderate these effects based on the complex adaptive systems (CASs) perspective. This study adopts the event study method to analyze the impact of the U.S. investment restriction event in China on the shareholder value of Chinese listed firms. To test our model, we collected data from 812 Chinese listed firms. The U.S. investment restriction event adversely affects the shareholder value of targeted industries in China. Furthermore, we observe a negative correlation between operational leanness and cumulative abnormal returns, while operational resilience exhibits a positive association with cumulative abnormal returns. We also delve into the impact of demand uncertainty and betweenness centrality on these two moderating effects. Our findings reveal that demand uncertainty weakens the positive influence of operational resilience, whereas betweenness centrality strengthens it. However, neither demand uncertainty nor betweenness centrality influences the efficacy of operational leanness. This research enriches the geopolitical risk literature by focusing on a significant investment restriction act. Our study contributes to the different roles of operational leanness and resilience in mitigating geopolitical risks as well as their boundary conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 104214"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525002558","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The U.S.-China trade war significantly impacts global supply chain security and stability. This study delves into a particular policy enacted by the U.S. amid the U.S.-China trade war context, targeting foreign investment in China. Our focus is on examining its repercussions on the stock market of relevant high-tech industries in China, and we explore how operational leanness and operational resilience hedge the impact, as well as environmental and network factors moderate these effects based on the complex adaptive systems (CASs) perspective. This study adopts the event study method to analyze the impact of the U.S. investment restriction event in China on the shareholder value of Chinese listed firms. To test our model, we collected data from 812 Chinese listed firms. The U.S. investment restriction event adversely affects the shareholder value of targeted industries in China. Furthermore, we observe a negative correlation between operational leanness and cumulative abnormal returns, while operational resilience exhibits a positive association with cumulative abnormal returns. We also delve into the impact of demand uncertainty and betweenness centrality on these two moderating effects. Our findings reveal that demand uncertainty weakens the positive influence of operational resilience, whereas betweenness centrality strengthens it. However, neither demand uncertainty nor betweenness centrality influences the efficacy of operational leanness. This research enriches the geopolitical risk literature by focusing on a significant investment restriction act. Our study contributes to the different roles of operational leanness and resilience in mitigating geopolitical risks as well as their boundary conditions.
运营精益和弹性对地缘政治风险管理的影响:需求不确定性和中间性中心性的调节作用
中美贸易战严重影响全球供应链安全与稳定。本研究探讨了美国在中美贸易战背景下制定的一项针对外国在华投资的特定政策。基于复杂适应系统(CASs)的视角,本文重点研究了其对中国相关高科技产业股票市场的影响,并探讨了运营精益度和运营弹性如何对冲这些影响,以及环境和网络因素如何调节这些影响。本研究采用事件研究法,分析美国在华投资限制事件对中国上市公司股东价值的影响。为了验证我们的模型,我们收集了812家中国上市公司的数据。美国的投资限制事件对中国目标行业的股东价值产生了不利影响。此外,我们观察到经营精益度与累积异常收益呈负相关,而经营弹性与累积异常收益呈正相关。我们还深入研究了需求不确定性和中间性中心性对这两种调节效应的影响。研究发现,需求不确定性削弱了运营弹性的正向影响,而中介中心性增强了运营弹性的正向影响。然而,需求不确定性和中间性中心性都不影响运营精益的有效性。本研究通过关注一项重要的投资限制法案,丰富了地缘政治风险文献。我们的研究有助于业务精益和弹性在减轻地缘政治风险及其边界条件中的不同作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信