Return to intended oncologic treatment: Definitions, perioperative prognostic factors, and interventions

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Carlos E. Guerra-Londono , Alexander Schreck , Arun Muthukumar , Juan J. Guerra-Londono
{"title":"Return to intended oncologic treatment: Definitions, perioperative prognostic factors, and interventions","authors":"Carlos E. Guerra-Londono ,&nbsp;Alexander Schreck ,&nbsp;Arun Muthukumar ,&nbsp;Juan J. Guerra-Londono","doi":"10.1016/j.bpa.2025.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the cancer survivorship journey, many patients require both medical and surgical oncologic treatments to improve survival. The return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT) is a relatively new concept addressing the continuity of cancer treatment after surgery. While general definitions have been published, thresholds and minimal clinically important differences (MCID) have not been standardised. For many cancers, a threshold for delayed RIOT is 6–8 weeks, while the MCID in colorectal cancer may approximate 4 weeks. Studies addressing RIOT have shown multiple demographics, socioeconomic, institutional, surgical, and postoperative factors associated with a difference in rate and time to RIOT. The most influential of these variables is the surgical approach. While research on the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on RIOT has increased, the literature is still in its early stages. Finally, the effect of anaesthetic interventions on RIOT has been largely unexplored.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48541,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research-Clinical Anaesthesiology","volume":"39 1","pages":"Pages 14-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research-Clinical Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521689625000151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the cancer survivorship journey, many patients require both medical and surgical oncologic treatments to improve survival. The return to intended oncologic treatment (RIOT) is a relatively new concept addressing the continuity of cancer treatment after surgery. While general definitions have been published, thresholds and minimal clinically important differences (MCID) have not been standardised. For many cancers, a threshold for delayed RIOT is 6–8 weeks, while the MCID in colorectal cancer may approximate 4 weeks. Studies addressing RIOT have shown multiple demographics, socioeconomic, institutional, surgical, and postoperative factors associated with a difference in rate and time to RIOT. The most influential of these variables is the surgical approach. While research on the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on RIOT has increased, the literature is still in its early stages. Finally, the effect of anaesthetic interventions on RIOT has been largely unexplored.
回归预期的肿瘤治疗:定义、围手术期预后因素和干预措施
在癌症生存之旅中,许多患者需要内科和外科肿瘤治疗来提高生存率。回归预期肿瘤治疗(RIOT)是一个相对较新的概念,涉及癌症手术后治疗的连续性。虽然已经公布了一般定义,但阈值和最小临床重要差异(MCID)尚未标准化。对于许多癌症,延迟RIOT的阈值为6-8周,而结直肠癌的MCID可能接近4周。针对RIOT的研究表明,多种人口统计学、社会经济、制度、手术和术后因素与RIOT的发生率和时间差异有关。这些变量中影响最大的是手术入路。虽然对RIOT术后增强恢复效果的研究有所增加,但文献仍处于早期阶段。最后,麻醉干预对RIOT的影响在很大程度上尚未被探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
36 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信