Effect of a mHealth intervention on health literacy in patients completing cardiac rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial with one- and five-year follow-up
Pernille Lunde , Hanne Søberg Finbråten , Are Hugo Pripp , Birgitta Blakstad Nilsson , Jostein Grimsmo , Asta Bye
{"title":"Effect of a mHealth intervention on health literacy in patients completing cardiac rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial with one- and five-year follow-up","authors":"Pernille Lunde , Hanne Søberg Finbråten , Are Hugo Pripp , Birgitta Blakstad Nilsson , Jostein Grimsmo , Asta Bye","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><div>Adherence to treatment is a significant challenge for patients with cardiac disease. Optimizing health literacy (HL) is essential in this context. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions have been suggested to improve both treatment adherence and HL. This study aimed to examine the effect of a one-year mHealth intervention on HL and to compare HL changes between the intervention- and the control group.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This randomized controlled trial included patients completing cardiac rehabilitation, who were randomly allocated to either an intervention group receiving individualized follow-up via an app for one year or a control group receiving usual care. From one-year follow-up to the five-year follow-up, both groups received usual care. HL was measured using the HLS-Q12. Mixed model for repeated measurements and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used to analyse differences between groups, while paired sample <em>t</em>-test and Kendall's Tau b correlation analysed within-group changes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 113 patients were included in the study. No statistically significant differences between the groups were found in total HLS-Q12 score or at item level at any follow-up. However, a statistically significant within-group improvement was observed in the intervention group for the total score (mean change of 2.5 ± 4.6, p < 0.01) and several HLS-Q12 items from baseline to one-year follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The one-year mHealth intervention did not show an effect on HL levels at one- or five-year follow-ups. However, significant within-group HL improvement from baseline to one-year follow-up suggests that mHealth interventions may have the potential to enhance HL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29726,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 200445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487525000832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims
Adherence to treatment is a significant challenge for patients with cardiac disease. Optimizing health literacy (HL) is essential in this context. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions have been suggested to improve both treatment adherence and HL. This study aimed to examine the effect of a one-year mHealth intervention on HL and to compare HL changes between the intervention- and the control group.
Methods
This randomized controlled trial included patients completing cardiac rehabilitation, who were randomly allocated to either an intervention group receiving individualized follow-up via an app for one year or a control group receiving usual care. From one-year follow-up to the five-year follow-up, both groups received usual care. HL was measured using the HLS-Q12. Mixed model for repeated measurements and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used to analyse differences between groups, while paired sample t-test and Kendall's Tau b correlation analysed within-group changes.
Results
A total of 113 patients were included in the study. No statistically significant differences between the groups were found in total HLS-Q12 score or at item level at any follow-up. However, a statistically significant within-group improvement was observed in the intervention group for the total score (mean change of 2.5 ± 4.6, p < 0.01) and several HLS-Q12 items from baseline to one-year follow-up.
Conclusions
The one-year mHealth intervention did not show an effect on HL levels at one- or five-year follow-ups. However, significant within-group HL improvement from baseline to one-year follow-up suggests that mHealth interventions may have the potential to enhance HL.
背景和目的对心脏病患者来说,坚持治疗是一个重大挑战。在这种情况下,优化健康素养(HL)至关重要。移动医疗(mHealth)干预措施已被建议用于改善治疗依从性和HL。本研究旨在研究为期一年的移动健康干预对HL的影响,并比较干预组和对照组之间HL的变化。方法:本随机对照试验纳入完成心脏康复的患者,随机分为干预组和对照组,干预组通过应用程序接受个性化随访一年,对照组接受常规护理。从1年随访到5年随访,两组患者均接受常规护理。HL采用HLS-Q12测定。使用重复测量混合模型和Wilcoxon符号秩检验分析组间差异,使用配对样本t检验和Kendall's Tau b相关分析组内变化。结果共纳入113例患者。各组之间在HLS-Q12总分或任何随访项目水平上均无统计学显著差异。然而,干预组总得分在组内有统计学意义的改善(平均变化为2.5±4.6,p <;从基线到1年随访,HLS-Q12多项指标均为0.01)。为期一年的移动健康干预在1年或5年的随访中没有显示出对HL水平的影响。然而,从基线到一年随访期间,组内HL的显著改善表明,移动健康干预可能具有增强HL的潜力。