Short-term Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Tears in Underweight Patients

Roger Quesada-Jimenez, Jessica C. Keane, Ady H. Kahana-Rojkind, Yasemin E. Kingham, Matthew J. Strok, Benjamin G. Domb
{"title":"Short-term Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Tears in Underweight Patients","authors":"Roger Quesada-Jimenez, Jessica C. Keane, Ady H. Kahana-Rojkind, Yasemin E. Kingham, Matthew J. Strok, Benjamin G. Domb","doi":"10.1177/03635465251343299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Being underweight or malnourished has been recognized as an adverse prognostic factor in various surgical orthopaedic interventions. Purpose: (1) To report minimum 2-year outcomes of underweight patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral tears and (2) to compare these results with a propensity-matched control group of patients with normal weight. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Data were retrospectively analyzed for patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≤18.5 kg/m <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> who underwent primary hip arthroscopy by the senior surgeon at a single institution as treatment for FAI and labral tears between August 2008 and January 2022. Included patients had complete pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain at minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinically important thresholds for hip arthroscopy, revision surgery, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty were included in the analysis. Patients were propensity matched to a control group of normal weight patients (BMI, 18.6-24.99 kg/m <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> ) in a 1:2 ratio based on sex, age at surgery, acetabular Outerbridge grade, labral treatment, and capsular treatment. Results: A total of 234 patients were included in the study. Underweight patients displayed significant improvements across all PROs and high patient satisfaction. When underweight patients were compared with a benchmark control group, similar magnitudes of improvement were observed at a minimum 2-year follow-up for modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score, International Hip Outcome Tool-12, and VAS. Furthermore, the study cohort had a lower magnitude of improvement for the Hip Outcome Score–Sports-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS) ( <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; .05). The study group reached Patient Acceptable Symptom State for HOS-SSS at lower rates. Underweight patients had a higher frequency of revision hip arthroscopy with a relative risk of 2.16 ( <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; .05). Conclusion: Hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAI and labral tear in underweight patients yielded significant short-term improvements in PROs, which, except for postoperative VAS pain score and change in HOS-SSS, were comparable with a benchmark matched control group of normal weight patients. However, underweight patients had a 2.16-fold increased relative risk for revision hip arthroscopy. Underweight patients may benefit from preoperative nutritional evaluation.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465251343299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Being underweight or malnourished has been recognized as an adverse prognostic factor in various surgical orthopaedic interventions. Purpose: (1) To report minimum 2-year outcomes of underweight patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and labral tears and (2) to compare these results with a propensity-matched control group of patients with normal weight. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Data were retrospectively analyzed for patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≤18.5 kg/m 2 who underwent primary hip arthroscopy by the senior surgeon at a single institution as treatment for FAI and labral tears between August 2008 and January 2022. Included patients had complete pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain at minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinically important thresholds for hip arthroscopy, revision surgery, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty were included in the analysis. Patients were propensity matched to a control group of normal weight patients (BMI, 18.6-24.99 kg/m 2 ) in a 1:2 ratio based on sex, age at surgery, acetabular Outerbridge grade, labral treatment, and capsular treatment. Results: A total of 234 patients were included in the study. Underweight patients displayed significant improvements across all PROs and high patient satisfaction. When underweight patients were compared with a benchmark control group, similar magnitudes of improvement were observed at a minimum 2-year follow-up for modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score, International Hip Outcome Tool-12, and VAS. Furthermore, the study cohort had a lower magnitude of improvement for the Hip Outcome Score–Sports-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS) ( P < .05). The study group reached Patient Acceptable Symptom State for HOS-SSS at lower rates. Underweight patients had a higher frequency of revision hip arthroscopy with a relative risk of 2.16 ( P < .05). Conclusion: Hip arthroscopy for the treatment of FAI and labral tear in underweight patients yielded significant short-term improvements in PROs, which, except for postoperative VAS pain score and change in HOS-SSS, were comparable with a benchmark matched control group of normal weight patients. However, underweight patients had a 2.16-fold increased relative risk for revision hip arthroscopy. Underweight patients may benefit from preoperative nutritional evaluation.
髋关节镜治疗体重过轻患者股骨髋臼撞击和唇裂的短期疗效
背景:体重过轻或营养不良已被认为是各种骨科手术干预的不良预后因素。目的:(1)报道体重过轻患者因股髋臼撞击(FAI)和唇部撕裂而接受初级髋关节镜检查的至少2年的结果;(2)将这些结果与体重正常的患者倾向匹配的对照组进行比较。研究设计:病例系列;证据等级,4级。方法:回顾性分析2008年8月至2022年1月在同一机构由高级外科医生接受原发性髋关节镜治疗的体重指数(BMI)≤18.5 kg/ m2的FAI和唇部撕裂患者的数据。在至少2年的随访中,纳入的患者有完整的术前和术后患者报告结果(PROs)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分。在分析中纳入了髋关节镜检查、翻修手术和全髋关节置换术的临床重要阈值。根据性别、手术年龄、髋臼外桥分级、唇部治疗和关节囊治疗,以1:2的比例将患者倾向匹配到正常体重患者(BMI, 18.6-24.99 kg/ m2)的对照组。结果:共纳入234例患者。体重过轻的患者在所有PROs上都有显著改善,患者满意度也很高。当体重过轻的患者与基准对照组进行比较时,在修改Harris髋关节评分、非关节炎髋关节评分、国际髋关节结局工具-12和VAS的至少2年随访中观察到类似程度的改善。此外,研究队列在髋关节结局评分-运动特异性亚量表(HOS-SSS)方面的改善程度较低(P <;. 05)。研究组达到HOS-SSS患者可接受症状状态的比率较低。体重过轻的患者翻修髋关节镜的频率更高,相对危险度为2.16 (P <;. 05)。结论:关节镜治疗体重过轻患者的FAI和唇裂在短期内显著改善了PROs,除了术后VAS疼痛评分和HOS-SSS的变化外,与正常体重患者的基准匹配对照组相当。然而,体重过轻的患者进行髋关节镜翻修的相对风险增加了2.16倍。体重过轻的患者可以从术前营养评估中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信