Evaluating the Effectiveness of Insulin Plus Oral Medications Versus Oral Anti-Diabetes Therapy Alone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes With Very High hbA1c and Acute Coronary Syndrome

IF 2.7 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Adeel Ahmad Khan, Fateen Ata, Afia Aziz, Aya Janan Qassim, Ahmed Shukri, Khaled Abdallah Aboujabal, Yazan Almohtasib, Amin Jayyousi, Mohammed Bashir, Haval Surchi
{"title":"Evaluating the Effectiveness of Insulin Plus Oral Medications Versus Oral Anti-Diabetes Therapy Alone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes With Very High hbA1c and Acute Coronary Syndrome","authors":"Adeel Ahmad Khan,&nbsp;Fateen Ata,&nbsp;Afia Aziz,&nbsp;Aya Janan Qassim,&nbsp;Ahmed Shukri,&nbsp;Khaled Abdallah Aboujabal,&nbsp;Yazan Almohtasib,&nbsp;Amin Jayyousi,&nbsp;Mohammed Bashir,&nbsp;Haval Surchi","doi":"10.1002/edm2.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Many patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) are newly diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with very high hbA1c levels (&gt; 10%). Early achievement of glycaemic control is of prime importance in such cases, and many guidelines recommend starting insulin together with oral anti-diabetic drugs (OAD) as part of discharge medications. However, large numbers of treatment-naïve patients are hesitant to use insulin due to various factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this retrospective, single-centre, observational study, we compared the hbA1c at 1-year follow-up between newly diagnosed DM patients with initial hbA1c &gt; 10% who were discharged on insulin plus OAD versus those only on OAD after admission with ACS. Pairwise comparisons between continuous and categorical study variables were performed using t-test, Mann–Whitney test, and chi-square. We used STATA 18 for analysis. Baseline characteristics have been described for all the patients included in the study. In the analysis of outcomes at follow-up, only patients who had follow-up at 1-year were included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 149 patients eligible for inclusion, the majority were males (97.3%). The mean age was 47 ± 8.3 years. The baseline hbA1c at diagnosis was 11.2 (10.5–12.3) %. 38 (25.5%) Were Discharged on insulin + OADs, whereas 111 (75.5%) Were Discharged Only on OADs. There was no statistically significant difference in change in hbA1c from baseline between the two groups (Mean (SD) 4.4% ± 1.8% vs. 4% ± 1.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.07). None of the patients had any hyperglycaemic emergency, and there were no differences in recurrent admissions due to cardiac indications (<i>p</i> = 0.5).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>An anti-DM regimen consisting of multiple oral agents is a safe and effective alternative to insulin plus OAD and can lead to a comparable reduction in hbA1c at 1-year in patients who are not willing to use insulin early after diagnosis of T2DM.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36522,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edm2.70069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edm2.70069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Many patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) are newly diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with very high hbA1c levels (> 10%). Early achievement of glycaemic control is of prime importance in such cases, and many guidelines recommend starting insulin together with oral anti-diabetic drugs (OAD) as part of discharge medications. However, large numbers of treatment-naïve patients are hesitant to use insulin due to various factors.

Methods

In this retrospective, single-centre, observational study, we compared the hbA1c at 1-year follow-up between newly diagnosed DM patients with initial hbA1c > 10% who were discharged on insulin plus OAD versus those only on OAD after admission with ACS. Pairwise comparisons between continuous and categorical study variables were performed using t-test, Mann–Whitney test, and chi-square. We used STATA 18 for analysis. Baseline characteristics have been described for all the patients included in the study. In the analysis of outcomes at follow-up, only patients who had follow-up at 1-year were included.

Results

Of 149 patients eligible for inclusion, the majority were males (97.3%). The mean age was 47 ± 8.3 years. The baseline hbA1c at diagnosis was 11.2 (10.5–12.3) %. 38 (25.5%) Were Discharged on insulin + OADs, whereas 111 (75.5%) Were Discharged Only on OADs. There was no statistically significant difference in change in hbA1c from baseline between the two groups (Mean (SD) 4.4% ± 1.8% vs. 4% ± 1.5%, p = 0.07). None of the patients had any hyperglycaemic emergency, and there were no differences in recurrent admissions due to cardiac indications (p = 0.5).

Conclusion

An anti-DM regimen consisting of multiple oral agents is a safe and effective alternative to insulin plus OAD and can lead to a comparable reduction in hbA1c at 1-year in patients who are not willing to use insulin early after diagnosis of T2DM.

评价胰岛素加口服药物与单独口服抗糖尿病治疗对新诊断的2型糖尿病伴高糖化血红蛋白和急性冠状动脉综合征患者的疗效
许多急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者新诊断为2型糖尿病(T2DM), hbA1c水平非常高(> 10%)。在这种情况下,早期实现血糖控制是最重要的,许多指南建议开始使用胰岛素和口服抗糖尿病药物(OAD)作为出院药物的一部分。然而,由于各种因素,大量treatment-naïve患者对使用胰岛素犹豫不决。方法:在这项回顾性、单中心、观察性研究中,我们比较了初始hbA1c≤10%的新诊断糖尿病患者在入院后接受胰岛素+ OAD治疗出院时与仅接受OAD治疗的糖尿病患者1年随访时的hbA1c。使用t检验、Mann-Whitney检验和卡方对连续和分类研究变量进行两两比较。我们使用STATA 18进行分析。已描述了研究中所有患者的基线特征。在随访结果分析中,仅纳入随访1年的患者。结果149例符合纳入条件的患者中,男性居多(97.3%)。平均年龄47±8.3岁。诊断时基线hbA1c为11.2(10.5-12.3)%。胰岛素+ OADs治疗出院38例(25.5%),单纯OADs治疗出院111例(75.5%)。两组患者hbA1c较基线变化无统计学差异(平均(SD) 4.4%±1.8% vs. 4%±1.5%,p = 0.07)。两组患者均无任何高血糖紧急情况,因心脏指征而再次入院的患者也无差异(p = 0.5)。结论由多种口服药物组成的抗糖尿病方案是一种安全有效的胰岛素+ OAD替代方案,对于诊断为T2DM后不愿意早期使用胰岛素的患者,可导致1年后hbA1c的相当降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信