{"title":"Dopamine says do that again","authors":"Luis A. Mejia","doi":"10.1038/s41593-025-01995-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Repeated actions may be reinforced through action prediction error — the difference between an executed action and its prediction given a particular state — but experimental evidence for such a movement-based, value-free teaching signal has been lacking. Greenstreet, Martinez Vergara, Johansson et al. trained mice on an auditory discrimination task and found that dopamine in the tail of the striatum (TS) is needed for learning, and that TS dopamine levels correlate with movement, but not reward, on the choice task. The movement-related dopamine signal in TS decreased over the course of learning, increased when an unfamiliar stimulus was used, and reinforced stimulus–action associations on the choice task; these findings are consistent with dopamine encoding a value-free action prediction error. A dual-controller model incorporating both value-based (reward prediction error via ventral striatum) and value-free (action prediction error via TS) systems learned the task faster than a value-based controller alone and implicated a role for TS during the later stages of learning. These findings suggest that movement-related dopamine signals in TS, and perhaps in other parts of the dorsal striatum, encode a value-free teaching signal that reinforces state–action associations, promoting the repetition of actions. Action prediction error may thus serve as the basis for the implementation of habitual behavior.</p><p><b>Original reference:</b> <i>Nature</i> https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09008-9 (2025)</p>","PeriodicalId":19076,"journal":{"name":"Nature neuroscience","volume":"523 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-025-01995-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Repeated actions may be reinforced through action prediction error — the difference between an executed action and its prediction given a particular state — but experimental evidence for such a movement-based, value-free teaching signal has been lacking. Greenstreet, Martinez Vergara, Johansson et al. trained mice on an auditory discrimination task and found that dopamine in the tail of the striatum (TS) is needed for learning, and that TS dopamine levels correlate with movement, but not reward, on the choice task. The movement-related dopamine signal in TS decreased over the course of learning, increased when an unfamiliar stimulus was used, and reinforced stimulus–action associations on the choice task; these findings are consistent with dopamine encoding a value-free action prediction error. A dual-controller model incorporating both value-based (reward prediction error via ventral striatum) and value-free (action prediction error via TS) systems learned the task faster than a value-based controller alone and implicated a role for TS during the later stages of learning. These findings suggest that movement-related dopamine signals in TS, and perhaps in other parts of the dorsal striatum, encode a value-free teaching signal that reinforces state–action associations, promoting the repetition of actions. Action prediction error may thus serve as the basis for the implementation of habitual behavior.
Original reference:Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09008-9 (2025)
期刊介绍:
Nature Neuroscience, a multidisciplinary journal, publishes papers of the utmost quality and significance across all realms of neuroscience. The editors welcome contributions spanning molecular, cellular, systems, and cognitive neuroscience, along with psychophysics, computational modeling, and nervous system disorders. While no area is off-limits, studies offering fundamental insights into nervous system function receive priority.
The journal offers high visibility to both readers and authors, fostering interdisciplinary communication and accessibility to a broad audience. It maintains high standards of copy editing and production, rigorous peer review, rapid publication, and operates independently from academic societies and other vested interests.
In addition to primary research, Nature Neuroscience features news and views, reviews, editorials, commentaries, perspectives, book reviews, and correspondence, aiming to serve as the voice of the global neuroscience community.