Association between parenteral nutrition and length of stay in late preterm and term infants: A retrospective cohort study.

Katrina A Savioli, Carl E Hunt, Anwar E Ahmed, Cara H Olsen, Reese H Clark, Nicole R Dobson
{"title":"Association between parenteral nutrition and length of stay in late preterm and term infants: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Katrina A Savioli, Carl E Hunt, Anwar E Ahmed, Cara H Olsen, Reese H Clark, Nicole R Dobson","doi":"10.1002/jpen.2781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to determine how the use of parenteral nutrition in late preterm and term infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) affects outcomes, specifically length of stay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study that included infants ≥35 weeks gestation admitted to a Pediatrix Medical Group-affiliated NICU on day of life 0-2 in 2009-2019. Propensity score matching was used to control for demographics, delivery characteristics, and severity of illness. Infants were excluded if they received comfort or palliative care in the delivery room or transferred before discharge home. The primary outcome was length of stay. Secondary outcomes were duration of conventional and high-frequency ventilation, late-onset sepsis, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total cohort had 470,433 neonates; of the 259,495 infants who met inclusion criteria and survived to discharge, 97,577 (37.6%) received parenteral nutrition. Of 59,580 propensity-matched neonates comparing parenteral nutrition vs no parenteral nutrition, those receiving parenteral nutrition (n = 29,790) had a longer median length of stay (10 vs 9 days, P < 0.0001). Analysis of secondary outcomes revealed a higher mean number of conventional ventilation days, higher odds of late-onset sepsis, and higher odds of mortality in neonates receiving parenteral nutrition vs no parenteral nutrition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parenteral nutrition in late preterm and term neonates is associated with increased length of stay, duration of conventional ventilation, and odds of late-onset sepsis and mortality. Prospective clinical trials are needed to better understand the optimal use and timing of parenteral nutrition and associated morbidities in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":520701,"journal":{"name":"JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aimed to determine how the use of parenteral nutrition in late preterm and term infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) affects outcomes, specifically length of stay.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study that included infants ≥35 weeks gestation admitted to a Pediatrix Medical Group-affiliated NICU on day of life 0-2 in 2009-2019. Propensity score matching was used to control for demographics, delivery characteristics, and severity of illness. Infants were excluded if they received comfort or palliative care in the delivery room or transferred before discharge home. The primary outcome was length of stay. Secondary outcomes were duration of conventional and high-frequency ventilation, late-onset sepsis, and mortality.

Results: The total cohort had 470,433 neonates; of the 259,495 infants who met inclusion criteria and survived to discharge, 97,577 (37.6%) received parenteral nutrition. Of 59,580 propensity-matched neonates comparing parenteral nutrition vs no parenteral nutrition, those receiving parenteral nutrition (n = 29,790) had a longer median length of stay (10 vs 9 days, P < 0.0001). Analysis of secondary outcomes revealed a higher mean number of conventional ventilation days, higher odds of late-onset sepsis, and higher odds of mortality in neonates receiving parenteral nutrition vs no parenteral nutrition.

Conclusion: Parenteral nutrition in late preterm and term neonates is associated with increased length of stay, duration of conventional ventilation, and odds of late-onset sepsis and mortality. Prospective clinical trials are needed to better understand the optimal use and timing of parenteral nutrition and associated morbidities in this population.

肠外营养与晚期早产儿和足月婴儿住院时间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:我们的目的是确定在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入住的晚期早产儿和足月婴儿中使用肠外营养如何影响结局,特别是住院时间。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入2009-2019年在0-2天大时入住儿科医学集团附属NICU的≥35周妊娠婴儿。倾向评分匹配用于控制人口统计学、分娩特征和疾病严重程度。如果婴儿在产房接受了舒适或姑息治疗,或在出院前转移回家,则排除在外。主要观察指标是住院时间。次要结局是常规和高频通气持续时间、晚发性败血症和死亡率。结果:总队列有470,433名新生儿;在符合纳入标准并存活至出院的259,495名婴儿中,97,577名(37.6%)接受了肠外营养。在59,580名倾向匹配的新生儿中,将肠外营养与未肠外营养进行比较,接受肠外营养的新生儿(n = 29,790)的中位住院时间更长(10天vs 9天)。结论:晚期早产儿和足月新生儿的肠外营养与住院时间、常规通气时间、晚发性败血症和死亡率的增加有关。需要前瞻性临床试验来更好地了解肠外营养的最佳使用和时机以及相关的发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信