What Kind of Information About the Accessibility of Sports Facilities Is Useful?

Jonas Wibowo, Jan Haut, Lasse Müller
{"title":"What Kind of Information About the Accessibility of Sports Facilities Is Useful?","authors":"Jonas Wibowo, Jan Haut, Lasse Müller","doi":"10.1123/apaq.2024-0203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates how accessibility information for sports facilities can be effectively designed and presented to serve diverse user needs. Through document analysis of 16 German-language publications and 18 expert interviews with stakeholders, including people with disabilities and facility planners, the research examined different approaches to organizing accessibility information. The study revealed three central systems for conceptualizing accessibility: by facility areas, by groups of people, and by spatial characteristics. Findings indicate a \"wheelchair bias\" in existing documentation, with wheelchair users receiving disproportionate attention compared with other disability groups. While binary accessibility ratings prove insufficient for individual users' needs, detailed spatial characteristic information enables more precise facility assessment. The research suggests that accessibility information systems should be flexible enough to serve different stakeholder needs, from detailed criteria for potential users to aggregated data for decision makers. The study contributes to developing more inclusive and user-friendly accessibility information systems for sports facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":520545,"journal":{"name":"Adapted physical activity quarterly : APAQ","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adapted physical activity quarterly : APAQ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.2024-0203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates how accessibility information for sports facilities can be effectively designed and presented to serve diverse user needs. Through document analysis of 16 German-language publications and 18 expert interviews with stakeholders, including people with disabilities and facility planners, the research examined different approaches to organizing accessibility information. The study revealed three central systems for conceptualizing accessibility: by facility areas, by groups of people, and by spatial characteristics. Findings indicate a "wheelchair bias" in existing documentation, with wheelchair users receiving disproportionate attention compared with other disability groups. While binary accessibility ratings prove insufficient for individual users' needs, detailed spatial characteristic information enables more precise facility assessment. The research suggests that accessibility information systems should be flexible enough to serve different stakeholder needs, from detailed criteria for potential users to aggregated data for decision makers. The study contributes to developing more inclusive and user-friendly accessibility information systems for sports facilities.

关于体育设施无障碍的哪些信息是有用的?
本研究探讨如何有效地设计和呈现体育设施的无障碍信息,以满足不同用户的需求。通过对16份德语出版物的文献分析和对利益相关者(包括残疾人和设施规划者)的18次专家访谈,研究考察了组织无障碍信息的不同方法。该研究揭示了概念化可达性的三个中心系统:按设施区域、按人群和按空间特征。研究结果表明,现有文献中存在“轮椅偏见”,与其他残疾群体相比,轮椅使用者受到了不成比例的关注。虽然二元可达性评级不足以满足个人用户的需求,但详细的空间特征信息可以更精确地评估设施。这项研究表明,无障碍信息系统应该足够灵活,以满足不同利益相关者的需求,从潜在用户的详细标准到决策者的汇总数据。该研究有助于为体育设施开发更具包容性和用户友好的无障碍信息系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信