Projection-based numerical optimization of transcranial magnetic coil placement for nonconvex target surfaces and double-cone coil geometries.

Xu Zhang, Roeland Hancock, Sabato Santaniello
{"title":"Projection-based numerical optimization of transcranial magnetic coil placement for nonconvex target surfaces and double-cone coil geometries.","authors":"Xu Zhang, Roeland Hancock, Sabato Santaniello","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/ade18b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective.</b>To develop a coil placement optimization pipeline for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) that improves over existing solutions by guaranteeing the feasibility of the solution when double-cone coils are used and/or targets are placed over nonconvex scalp areas like the occipital region.<b>Approach.</b>Our proposed pipeline estimates feasible candidate coil locations by projecting the coil's geometry over the scalp around the target site and optimizing the coil's orientation to maximize scalp exposure to coil while avoiding coil-to-scalp collision. Then, the reciprocity principle is used to select the best position/orientation among candidates and maximize the average electric field intensity at the target site. Our pipeline was tested on five MRI-derived human head models for three different targets (motor cortex, lateral cerebellum, and cerebellar inion) and four coil models (planar coil: MagStim D70; double-cone coils: MagStim DCC, MagVenture Cool-D-B80, and Deymed 120BFV).<b>Main results.</b>Our solution returned several feasible solutions for any combination of anatomical target and coil, calculated and screened over 2,000 candidates in minutes, and resulted in optimal locations that satisfy the minimum coil-scalp distance, whereas the direct method returned feasible candidates for just one combination of target and coil, i.e., planar coil and convex target over the motor cortex. We also found that, when the objective is to maximize the E-field magnitude, the target-to-scalp extension line is a better axis for coil translation compared to the normal vector at the scalp surface, which is commonly used in existing approaches.<b>Significance.</b>We expand the use of numerical optimization for coil placement to double-cone coils, which are rapidly diffusing in research and clinical settings, and novel application domains, e.g., cerebellar TMS and ataxia treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ade18b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.To develop a coil placement optimization pipeline for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) that improves over existing solutions by guaranteeing the feasibility of the solution when double-cone coils are used and/or targets are placed over nonconvex scalp areas like the occipital region.Approach.Our proposed pipeline estimates feasible candidate coil locations by projecting the coil's geometry over the scalp around the target site and optimizing the coil's orientation to maximize scalp exposure to coil while avoiding coil-to-scalp collision. Then, the reciprocity principle is used to select the best position/orientation among candidates and maximize the average electric field intensity at the target site. Our pipeline was tested on five MRI-derived human head models for three different targets (motor cortex, lateral cerebellum, and cerebellar inion) and four coil models (planar coil: MagStim D70; double-cone coils: MagStim DCC, MagVenture Cool-D-B80, and Deymed 120BFV).Main results.Our solution returned several feasible solutions for any combination of anatomical target and coil, calculated and screened over 2,000 candidates in minutes, and resulted in optimal locations that satisfy the minimum coil-scalp distance, whereas the direct method returned feasible candidates for just one combination of target and coil, i.e., planar coil and convex target over the motor cortex. We also found that, when the objective is to maximize the E-field magnitude, the target-to-scalp extension line is a better axis for coil translation compared to the normal vector at the scalp surface, which is commonly used in existing approaches.Significance.We expand the use of numerical optimization for coil placement to double-cone coils, which are rapidly diffusing in research and clinical settings, and novel application domains, e.g., cerebellar TMS and ataxia treatment.

非凸目标表面和双锥线圈几何形状经颅磁线圈放置的投影数值优化。
目标。为了开发一种经颅磁刺激(TMS)线圈放置优化管道,通过保证双锥线圈使用和/或目标放置在枕部等非凸头皮区域时解决方案的可行性,从而改进现有解决方案。方法:我们提出的管道通过在目标部位周围的头皮上投影线圈的几何形状来估计可行的候选线圈位置,并优化线圈的方向以最大化头皮暴露于线圈,同时避免线圈与头皮碰撞。然后,利用互易原理在候选点中选择最佳位置/方向,使目标点的平均电场强度最大化;我们的流水线在五个mri衍生的人类头部模型上进行了测试,这些模型针对三个不同的目标(运动皮层、小脑外侧和小脑)和四个线圈模型(平面线圈:MagStim D70;双锥线圈:MagStim DCC, MagVenture Cool-D-B80和Deymed 120BFV)。主要的结果。我们的解决方案为解剖目标和线圈的任何组合返回了几个可行的解决方案,在几分钟内计算和筛选了超过2000个候选点,并产生了满足最小线圈-头皮距离的最佳位置,而直接方法仅为目标和线圈的一个组合返回了可行的候选点,即平面线圈和运动皮层上的凸目标。我们还发现,当目标是最大化电场大小时,与现有方法中常用的头皮表面法向量相比,目标到头皮的延伸线是线圈平移的更好轴。意义:我们将线圈放置的数值优化的使用扩展到双锥体线圈,这在研究和临床环境中迅速扩散,以及新的应用领域,例如小脑经颅磁刺激和失调治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信