Substance use prevalence among immigrants by generational status in Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Maha Najdini, Joris Mathieu, Gérard Shadili, Antoine Frigaux, Maë Ménauges, Carla Mouton, Florence Gressier, Aziz Essadek
{"title":"Substance use prevalence among immigrants by generational status in Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Maha Najdini, Joris Mathieu, Gérard Shadili, Antoine Frigaux, Maë Ménauges, Carla Mouton, Florence Gressier, Aziz Essadek","doi":"10.1111/acer.70091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immigration has increased globally, particularly in Europe. While past research has looked into substance use among immigrants, there is a gap in understanding how generational status affects these patterns. This systematic review aimed to synthesize existing data on the differences in prevalence rates of substance use among immigrants by generational status to provide a thorough understanding of how substance use rates and trends vary between generations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane, and Embase for cohort studies until June 2024 with no language restrictions. We included studies published between 1990 and 2023, conducted in Europe, that examined substance use prevalence among first-generation immigrants (FGIs) and second-generation immigrants (SGIs). Following the data extraction, the data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 10 records from 157,426 articles screened, covering 2,652,732 individuals. The summary OR for alcohol use was 1.68 (95% CI: 1.32-2.13) with some variability in the results of individual studies, and women of second generation were found to be at higher risk, OR 1.85 (95% CI: 0.54-6.40). The OR for tobacco use was 1.18 (95% CI: 0.45-3.08), based on three effect estimates indicating an absence of significant difference between FGIs and SGIs. Regarding drug use, the OR was 2.50 (95% CI: 2.06-3.03), highlighting a significant association between drug use and SGI status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this meta-analysis indicate a higher risk of substance use among SGIs compared to FGIs, particularly for drug use and among women for alcohol use. These results highlight the need for further data on consumption patterns across generations to develop effective, culturally tailored intervention and prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72145,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol (Hanover, York County, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.70091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immigration has increased globally, particularly in Europe. While past research has looked into substance use among immigrants, there is a gap in understanding how generational status affects these patterns. This systematic review aimed to synthesize existing data on the differences in prevalence rates of substance use among immigrants by generational status to provide a thorough understanding of how substance use rates and trends vary between generations.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane, and Embase for cohort studies until June 2024 with no language restrictions. We included studies published between 1990 and 2023, conducted in Europe, that examined substance use prevalence among first-generation immigrants (FGIs) and second-generation immigrants (SGIs). Following the data extraction, the data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated.

Results: We identified 10 records from 157,426 articles screened, covering 2,652,732 individuals. The summary OR for alcohol use was 1.68 (95% CI: 1.32-2.13) with some variability in the results of individual studies, and women of second generation were found to be at higher risk, OR 1.85 (95% CI: 0.54-6.40). The OR for tobacco use was 1.18 (95% CI: 0.45-3.08), based on three effect estimates indicating an absence of significant difference between FGIs and SGIs. Regarding drug use, the OR was 2.50 (95% CI: 2.06-3.03), highlighting a significant association between drug use and SGI status.

Conclusions: The findings of this meta-analysis indicate a higher risk of substance use among SGIs compared to FGIs, particularly for drug use and among women for alcohol use. These results highlight the need for further data on consumption patterns across generations to develop effective, culturally tailored intervention and prevention strategies.

欧洲移民中物质使用的流行程度:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:移民在全球范围内有所增加,尤其是在欧洲。虽然过去的研究调查了移民的物质使用情况,但在理解代际地位如何影响这些模式方面存在差距。本系统综述旨在综合有关移民中物质使用流行率差异的现有数据,以全面了解物质使用率和趋势在代际之间的差异。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed、PsycINFO、Web of Science、Medline、Cochrane和Embase的队列研究,直到2024年6月,没有语言限制。我们纳入了1990年至2023年在欧洲发表的研究,这些研究调查了第一代移民(fgi)和第二代移民(sgi)的物质使用情况。数据提取后,使用随机效应荟萃分析合并数据,计算优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:我们从筛选的157,426篇文献中筛选出10条记录,涵盖2,652,732人。酒精使用的总体OR为1.68 (95% CI: 1.32-2.13),个别研究结果存在一些差异,第二代女性的风险更高,OR为1.85 (95% CI: 0.54-6.40)。基于三个效应估计,烟草使用的OR为1.18 (95% CI: 0.45-3.08),表明fgi和sgi之间没有显著差异。关于药物使用,OR为2.50 (95% CI: 2.06-3.03),突出了药物使用与SGI状态之间的显著关联。结论:本荟萃分析的结果表明,与男性男性女性相比,男性男性女性女性的物质使用风险更高,尤其是吸毒和饮酒。这些结果突出表明,需要进一步了解各代人的消费模式,以制定有效的、符合文化特点的干预和预防战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信