Printing outsourced orthognathic surgical splints in-house: a dimensional verification process for point-of-care printing.
IF 3.2
Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Talal Beidas, Luther Light, Caroline Carrico, Shayne Kondor, Prasanth Ravi, Yotom A Rabinowitz
下载PDF
{"title":"Printing outsourced orthognathic surgical splints in-house: a dimensional verification process for point-of-care printing.","authors":"Talal Beidas, Luther Light, Caroline Carrico, Shayne Kondor, Prasanth Ravi, Yotom A Rabinowitz","doi":"10.1186/s41205-025-00276-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both outsourcing virtual surgery planning and 3D printed splint fabrication have become the standard in the field of orthognathic surgery. In-house (IH) adaptation of these presurgical operations requires compliance with regulatory bodies when designing and manufacturing medical-grade products. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of IH 3D printed orthognathic surgical splints within a hybrid workflow for externally designed splints.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An in vitro study was conducted utilizing an outsourced (OS) orthognathic surgical splint file from a previously treated patient. The control group included the splint's original standard tessellation language (STL) file. Experimental groups included: splint (a) milled with zirconia, (b) 3D printed on a Phrozen 4 K (commercial printer), (c) 3D printed on Formlabs 3B+ (Formlabs 3B + have track record of having FDA cleared materials and workflows in dental applications and have potential materials that could be used for IH manufacturing for orthognathic splints upon further testing and FDA clearance). Surface area analysis was performed using 3-Matic (Materialise© Mimics Software) to generate root mean square (RMS) values between digital copies of the splints and their corresponding original STL files.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RMS error in equipment processing and analysis was measured at 0.10 mm. Accounting for this error, the 3D-printed splints exhibited an average RMS of 0.20 mm for both the Formlabs 3B + and the Phrozen 4 K. No statistically significant difference was found between splints from different printers or replicas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents a verification process for providers to verify the geometric stability and reproducibility of their IH-printed orthognathic splints (RMS 0.20 mm). Clinicians may find this study useful when crafting a regulatory-compliant process for the IH manufacturing of OS orthognathic surgery splints.</p>","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12143043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3D printing in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-025-00276-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Background: Both outsourcing virtual surgery planning and 3D printed splint fabrication have become the standard in the field of orthognathic surgery. In-house (IH) adaptation of these presurgical operations requires compliance with regulatory bodies when designing and manufacturing medical-grade products. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of IH 3D printed orthognathic surgical splints within a hybrid workflow for externally designed splints.
Materials and methods: An in vitro study was conducted utilizing an outsourced (OS) orthognathic surgical splint file from a previously treated patient. The control group included the splint's original standard tessellation language (STL) file. Experimental groups included: splint (a) milled with zirconia, (b) 3D printed on a Phrozen 4 K (commercial printer), (c) 3D printed on Formlabs 3B+ (Formlabs 3B + have track record of having FDA cleared materials and workflows in dental applications and have potential materials that could be used for IH manufacturing for orthognathic splints upon further testing and FDA clearance). Surface area analysis was performed using 3-Matic (Materialise© Mimics Software) to generate root mean square (RMS) values between digital copies of the splints and their corresponding original STL files.
Results: The RMS error in equipment processing and analysis was measured at 0.10 mm. Accounting for this error, the 3D-printed splints exhibited an average RMS of 0.20 mm for both the Formlabs 3B + and the Phrozen 4 K. No statistically significant difference was found between splints from different printers or replicas.
Conclusion: This study presents a verification process for providers to verify the geometric stability and reproducibility of their IH-printed orthognathic splints (RMS 0.20 mm). Clinicians may find this study useful when crafting a regulatory-compliant process for the IH manufacturing of OS orthognathic surgery splints.
印刷外包正颌外科夹板内部:一个尺寸验证过程的点护理印刷。
背景:外包虚拟手术计划和3D打印夹板制作已经成为正颌外科领域的标准。在设计和制造医疗级产品时,这些术前操作的内部(IH)适应性要求符合监管机构。本研究的目的是在外部设计夹板的混合工作流程中评估IH 3D打印正颌外科夹板的尺寸精度。材料和方法:一项体外研究利用外包(OS)正颌外科夹板文件从先前治疗的患者。对照组包括夹板原始的标准镶嵌语言(STL)文件。试验组包括:夹板(a)用氧化锆研磨,(b)在Phrozen 4 K(商用打印机)上3D打印,(c)在Formlabs 3B+上3D打印(Formlabs 3B+在牙科应用中具有FDA批准的材料和工作流程的记录,并且在进一步测试和FDA批准后具有可用于正颌夹板IH制造的潜在材料)。使用3-Matic (Materialise©Mimics Software)进行表面积分析,以生成夹板数字副本与其相应的原始STL文件之间的均方根(RMS)值。结果:仪器加工分析的均方根误差为0.10 mm。考虑到这一误差,3d打印的夹板在Formlabs 3B +和Phrozen 4 K上的平均RMS均为0.20 mm。不同打印机或复制品的夹板之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:本研究为供应商提供了一个验证过程,以验证其ih打印的正颌夹板的几何稳定性和可重复性(RMS 0.20 mm)。临床医生可能会发现这项研究在为OS正颌手术夹板的IH制造制定符合法规的流程时很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。