Judith Schrempf, Boris M Holzapfel, Hans Polzer, Sebastian F Baumbach
{"title":"[Arthroscopy in the treatment of acute and chronic syndesmotic injuries of the ankle joint].","authors":"Judith Schrempf, Boris M Holzapfel, Hans Polzer, Sebastian F Baumbach","doi":"10.1007/s00064-025-00907-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identification and treatment of concomitant intra-articular pathologies, verification of syndesmotic instability, debridement of syndesmotic structures in chronic injuries, reduction, and retention of the fibula in the distal tibiofibular joint.</p><p><strong>Indications: </strong>Acute and chronic two- or three-ligamentous syndesmotic ruptures in active patients.</p><p><strong>Contraindications: </strong>Soft tissue injuries, general risk factors, e.g., circulatory disorders, diabetic foot syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome.</p><p><strong>Surgical technique: </strong>Diagnostic arthroscopy of the ankle joint using anterolateral and -medial portals; identify and treat concomitant intra-articular pathologies; verify syndesmotic instability by inserting an instrument > 4 mm into the incisura fibularis; in case of chronic syndesmotic injuries, debridement of syndesmotic structures, and if necessary debridement of the deltoid ligament complex; reduction of the fibula in the incisura fibularis; retention of the fibula using a screw or flexible implant.</p><p><strong>Postoperative management: </strong>Partial weight-bearing with 20 kg for 6 weeks, no immobilization, exercise for the mobility of the ankle joint, X‑ray after 6 weeks, then increase of weight-bearing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Acute syndesmotic injuries: 19 patients (37 ± 13 years) were examined 38 ± 17 months after arthroscopically assisted treatment of an acute syndesmotic injury. 53% suffered a two-ligament injury, 16% a three-ligament injury, and in 32% a bony syndesmotic injury. Grade II cartilage damage was observed in 35%, grade IV damage in 20%, and loose bodies were removed in 16%. 94% of patients achieved a treatment outcome in line with the healthy reference population for the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS; primary outcome parameter) and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Type of syndesmotic injury and severity of cartilage damage had no significant influence on treatment outcomes. Chronic syndesmotic injuries: a systematic literature search identified 17 studies with 196 patients following surgically treated chronic syndesmotic injuries, 16 of which were retrospective case series and one prospective case series. Arthroscopically assisted surgery was performed in 13 studies. Regardless of the surgical technique, surgery resulted in an improvement in the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score in 10 studies. Overall, the study quality was low and the information on complications, secondary diastasis, treatment results, etc. was very limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":54677,"journal":{"name":"Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Orthopadie Und Traumatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-025-00907-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Identification and treatment of concomitant intra-articular pathologies, verification of syndesmotic instability, debridement of syndesmotic structures in chronic injuries, reduction, and retention of the fibula in the distal tibiofibular joint.
Indications: Acute and chronic two- or three-ligamentous syndesmotic ruptures in active patients.
Surgical technique: Diagnostic arthroscopy of the ankle joint using anterolateral and -medial portals; identify and treat concomitant intra-articular pathologies; verify syndesmotic instability by inserting an instrument > 4 mm into the incisura fibularis; in case of chronic syndesmotic injuries, debridement of syndesmotic structures, and if necessary debridement of the deltoid ligament complex; reduction of the fibula in the incisura fibularis; retention of the fibula using a screw or flexible implant.
Postoperative management: Partial weight-bearing with 20 kg for 6 weeks, no immobilization, exercise for the mobility of the ankle joint, X‑ray after 6 weeks, then increase of weight-bearing.
Results: Acute syndesmotic injuries: 19 patients (37 ± 13 years) were examined 38 ± 17 months after arthroscopically assisted treatment of an acute syndesmotic injury. 53% suffered a two-ligament injury, 16% a three-ligament injury, and in 32% a bony syndesmotic injury. Grade II cartilage damage was observed in 35%, grade IV damage in 20%, and loose bodies were removed in 16%. 94% of patients achieved a treatment outcome in line with the healthy reference population for the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS; primary outcome parameter) and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Type of syndesmotic injury and severity of cartilage damage had no significant influence on treatment outcomes. Chronic syndesmotic injuries: a systematic literature search identified 17 studies with 196 patients following surgically treated chronic syndesmotic injuries, 16 of which were retrospective case series and one prospective case series. Arthroscopically assisted surgery was performed in 13 studies. Regardless of the surgical technique, surgery resulted in an improvement in the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score in 10 studies. Overall, the study quality was low and the information on complications, secondary diastasis, treatment results, etc. was very limited.
期刊介绍:
Orthopedics and Traumatology is directed toward all orthopedic surgeons, trauma-tologists, hand surgeons, specialists in sports injuries, orthopedics and rheumatology as well as gene-al surgeons who require access to reliable information on current operative methods to ensure the quality of patient advice, preoperative planning, and postoperative care.
The journal presents established and new operative procedures in uniformly structured and extensively illustrated contributions. All aspects are presented step-by-step from indications, contraindications, patient education, and preparation of the operation right through to postoperative care. The advantages and disadvantages, possible complications, deficiencies and risks of the methods as well as significant results with their evaluation criteria are discussed. To allow the reader to assess the outcome, results are detailed and based on internationally recognized scoring systems.
Orthopedics and Traumatology facilitates effective advancement and further education for all those active in both special and conservative fields of orthopedics, traumatology, and general surgery, offers sup-port for therapeutic decision-making, and provides – more than 30 years after its first publication – constantly expanding and up-to-date teaching on operative techniques.