Debunking learning styles: analyzing key predictors of academic success in dental education.

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Physiology Education Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-06 DOI:10.1152/advan.00060.2025
Komal Marwaha, Urvashi Sharma
{"title":"Debunking learning styles: analyzing key predictors of academic success in dental education.","authors":"Komal Marwaha, Urvashi Sharma","doi":"10.1152/advan.00060.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To address the ambiguity regarding learning style preferences as predictors of academic success, this study examines the relationship between learning style preferences, gender, lecture attendance, and academic performance among undergraduate dental students. Learning style preferences using the Visual, Auditory, Reading/Writing, and Kinesthetic (VARK) questionnaire were assessed in 326 undergraduate dental students. Their gender, attendance, and academic scores were recorded to analyze correlations. The results showed that 58% of students preferred a multimodal learning style, with kinesthetic being the most common unimodal preference (23.6%). A significant correlation was found between lecture attendance and academic performance (<i>P</i> < 0.001), as 69.2% of students scoring below 50% were irregular attendees. However, some high-achieving (scores ≥70%) students were also irregular attendees, suggesting that self-directed study strategies may compensate for missed lectures. No significant association was observed between gender and lecture attendance or academic performance, reinforcing prior findings that multiple factors beyond gender influence academic success. Additionally, no significant correlation was found between assessed learning styles and academic performance, challenging the effectiveness of learning style-based instruction. A significant discrepancy between students assessed and perceived learning styles (<i>P</i> < 0.05) indicated that students may not accurately identify their learning preferences, relying instead on perceived preferences during independent study. Given these findings, adapting teaching strictly to assessed learning styles may be an inefficient use of resources. Instead, fostering active learning environments and emphasizing evidence-based study strategies may be more beneficial. These findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on learning styles and highlight the importance of research-driven educational practices in health professional education.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study challenges the effectiveness of learning style-based instruction by demonstrating no significant correlation between assessed learning styles and academic performance among dental students. It highlights a discrepancy between students' assessed and perceived learning styles, suggesting that students may not accurately identify their learning preferences. Additionally, the findings emphasize that self-directed study strategies can compensate for missed lectures, reinforcing the need for active learning approaches over rigid learning style-based teaching methods in health professional education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":"704-711"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00060.2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To address the ambiguity regarding learning style preferences as predictors of academic success, this study examines the relationship between learning style preferences, gender, lecture attendance, and academic performance among undergraduate dental students. Learning style preferences using the Visual, Auditory, Reading/Writing, and Kinesthetic (VARK) questionnaire were assessed in 326 undergraduate dental students. Their gender, attendance, and academic scores were recorded to analyze correlations. The results showed that 58% of students preferred a multimodal learning style, with kinesthetic being the most common unimodal preference (23.6%). A significant correlation was found between lecture attendance and academic performance (P < 0.001), as 69.2% of students scoring below 50% were irregular attendees. However, some high-achieving (scores ≥70%) students were also irregular attendees, suggesting that self-directed study strategies may compensate for missed lectures. No significant association was observed between gender and lecture attendance or academic performance, reinforcing prior findings that multiple factors beyond gender influence academic success. Additionally, no significant correlation was found between assessed learning styles and academic performance, challenging the effectiveness of learning style-based instruction. A significant discrepancy between students assessed and perceived learning styles (P < 0.05) indicated that students may not accurately identify their learning preferences, relying instead on perceived preferences during independent study. Given these findings, adapting teaching strictly to assessed learning styles may be an inefficient use of resources. Instead, fostering active learning environments and emphasizing evidence-based study strategies may be more beneficial. These findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on learning styles and highlight the importance of research-driven educational practices in health professional education.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study challenges the effectiveness of learning style-based instruction by demonstrating no significant correlation between assessed learning styles and academic performance among dental students. It highlights a discrepancy between students' assessed and perceived learning styles, suggesting that students may not accurately identify their learning preferences. Additionally, the findings emphasize that self-directed study strategies can compensate for missed lectures, reinforcing the need for active learning approaches over rigid learning style-based teaching methods in health professional education.

揭穿学习风格:分析牙科教育中学业成功的关键预测因素。
为了解决关于学习风格偏好作为学业成功预测因素的模糊性,本研究考察了学习风格偏好、性别、上课出勤率和牙科本科学生学业成绩之间的关系。采用VARK问卷对326名牙科本科学生进行学习风格偏好评估。他们的性别、出勤率和学习成绩被记录下来,以分析相关性。结果显示,58%的学生更喜欢多模态学习方式,其中动觉是最常见的单模态偏好(23.6%)。上课出勤率与学习成绩之间存在显著的相关性(p < 0.001),因为69.2%的得分低于50%的学生是非定期出勤率。然而,一些成绩优异(分数≥70%)的学生也不定期出席,这表明自主学习策略可以弥补错过的课程。性别与课堂出勤率或学习成绩之间没有明显的联系,这加强了先前的研究结果,即性别以外的多种因素影响学业成功。此外,被评估的学习风格与学业成绩之间没有显著的相关性,这对基于学习风格的教学的有效性提出了挑战。学生的学习风格与感知学习风格之间存在显著差异(p < 0.05),表明学生在自主学习中可能无法准确识别自己的学习偏好,而是依赖于感知偏好。鉴于这些发现,严格根据评估的学习方式调整教学可能是对资源的低效利用。相反,培养积极的学习环境和强调基于证据的学习策略可能更有益。这些发现有助于正在进行的关于学习方式的讨论,并强调了研究驱动的教育实践在卫生专业教育中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信