Optometry co-management of preoperative and postoperative cataract surgery patients.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Khushi Saigal, Shalini Shah, Zubair Ansari
{"title":"Optometry co-management of preoperative and postoperative cataract surgery patients.","authors":"Khushi Saigal, Shalini Shah, Zubair Ansari","doi":"10.1097/ICU.0000000000001153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>As the prevalence of cataracts continues to rise, the increasing demand for cataract surgery may surpass the availability of ophthalmologists. This review examines the role of optometry in the co-management of patients with cataracts, including preoperative and postoperative care, and discusses the implications of expanding optometric scope-of-practice laws.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Collaboration between optometrists and ophthalmologists occurs through two primary models: referral-based and integrated management. Studies indicate that direct referrals from optometrists to ophthalmologists improve surgical listing rates and streamline patient care. Integrated models enhance efficiency by incorporating optometrists into ophthalmology practices, allowing ophthalmologists to focus on surgical interventions. Postoperative care co-managed by optometrists has demonstrated mostly favorable visual outcomes, with 86% of patients achieving 20/40 vision or better and low postoperative complication rates. However, legislative changes expanding optometric surgical privileges remain controversial due to concerns about training adequacy and patient safety. Sharing clinical responsibilities can lead to a \"slippery slope\" phenomenon encroaching on the surgeon's role and threatening patient care.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Optometry-ophthalmology co-management can enhance surgical efficiency, improve patient access, and alleviate workforce shortages. While co-management may be effective for routine cases, the expansion of optometric surgical privileges raises debate regarding clinical competency and regulatory oversight. Future efforts should focus on creating best practice guidelines for standardizing training, shared ethical responsibility, and ensuring high-quality, patient-centered care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000001153","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: As the prevalence of cataracts continues to rise, the increasing demand for cataract surgery may surpass the availability of ophthalmologists. This review examines the role of optometry in the co-management of patients with cataracts, including preoperative and postoperative care, and discusses the implications of expanding optometric scope-of-practice laws.

Recent findings: Collaboration between optometrists and ophthalmologists occurs through two primary models: referral-based and integrated management. Studies indicate that direct referrals from optometrists to ophthalmologists improve surgical listing rates and streamline patient care. Integrated models enhance efficiency by incorporating optometrists into ophthalmology practices, allowing ophthalmologists to focus on surgical interventions. Postoperative care co-managed by optometrists has demonstrated mostly favorable visual outcomes, with 86% of patients achieving 20/40 vision or better and low postoperative complication rates. However, legislative changes expanding optometric surgical privileges remain controversial due to concerns about training adequacy and patient safety. Sharing clinical responsibilities can lead to a "slippery slope" phenomenon encroaching on the surgeon's role and threatening patient care.

Summary: Optometry-ophthalmology co-management can enhance surgical efficiency, improve patient access, and alleviate workforce shortages. While co-management may be effective for routine cases, the expansion of optometric surgical privileges raises debate regarding clinical competency and regulatory oversight. Future efforts should focus on creating best practice guidelines for standardizing training, shared ethical responsibility, and ensuring high-quality, patient-centered care.

验光在白内障手术患者术前和术后的联合管理。
综述目的:随着白内障患病率的持续上升,白内障手术的需求可能会超过眼科医生的可用性。这篇综述探讨了验光在白内障患者的共同管理中的作用,包括术前和术后护理,并讨论了扩大验光执业范围法律的意义。最近的研究发现:验光师和眼科医生之间的合作主要通过两种模式进行:基于转诊和综合管理。研究表明,从验光师直接转介给眼科医生可以提高手术成功率并简化患者护理。集成模型通过将验光师纳入眼科实践,提高了效率,使眼科医生能够专注于手术干预。由验光师共同管理的术后护理显示出大多数良好的视力结果,86%的患者视力达到20/40或更好,术后并发症发生率低。然而,由于对培训充分性和患者安全的担忧,扩大验光手术特权的立法变化仍然存在争议。分担临床责任会导致一种“滑坡”现象,侵犯外科医生的角色,威胁到病人的护理。摘要:验光与眼科联合管理可以提高手术效率,改善患者可及性,缓解劳动力短缺。虽然共同管理可能对常规病例有效,但验光手术特权的扩大引起了关于临床能力和监管监督的争论。未来的努力应侧重于为标准化培训、共同的道德责任和确保高质量、以患者为中心的护理制定最佳实践指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Ophthalmology is an indispensable resource featuring key up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. With renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Ophthalmology delivers a fresh insight into topics such as glaucoma, refractive surgery and corneal and external disorders. With ten sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, clinicians and other healthcare professionals alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信