Conor White, Samantha Klus, Wing Hai Ho, Lily Barrett, Orlaith Doherty, Olive Lennon
{"title":"Robotic-assisted gait training for spinal cord injury neuropathic pain: A systematic review.","authors":"Conor White, Samantha Klus, Wing Hai Ho, Lily Barrett, Orlaith Doherty, Olive Lennon","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2503049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Neuropathic pain (NP), can be a debilitating consequence of spinal cord injury. Robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) is an effective rehabilitation tool, but emerging evidence suggests it may prove an effective treatment for NP post-SCI.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aims to synthesize the available evidence examining RAGT for pain reduction post-SCI, focusing on NP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six databases were searched from inception to February 18th 2025, using search strings addressing: SCI and RAGT. No date or study type restrictions applied. Studies with SCI populations, delivering RAGT and measuring pain outcomes were included. Meta-analyses were conducted for pain intensity, pain interference (PI) and HRQoL outcomes. Certainty of evidence (COE) was assessed using GRADE criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty two studies (n = 567) (6 RCTs) met eligibility criteria. No RCT mandated pain as an inclusion criterion. Meta-analysis of 6 RCTs (n = 174) identified no effect for RAGT over other interventions for outcomes of overall pain intensity (SMD = 0.03 [-0.40, 0.46]; P = 0.90), non-specified pain-type intensity (SMD = 0.08 [-0.39, 0.55]; P = 0.74) and in one RCT reporting NP intensity (SMD = -0.46 [-1.61, 0.70]; P = 0.44). Meta-analysis identified no difference between RAGT and comparators for outcomes of HRQoL (3 RCTs (n = 69): SMD = 0.15 [-0.33,0.62]; P = 0.54) and PI (2 RCTs (n = 53): SMD = -0.1 [-0.64,0.44]; P = 0.71). Very-low COE for pain intensity & PI and low COE for HRQoL were assigned.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Very limited studies and inconclusive evidence supports RAGT for the reduction of NP post-SCI. Future RCTs of RAGT that recruit patients with moderate-to-severe NP at baseline are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2503049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Neuropathic pain (NP), can be a debilitating consequence of spinal cord injury. Robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) is an effective rehabilitation tool, but emerging evidence suggests it may prove an effective treatment for NP post-SCI.
Objective: This systematic review aims to synthesize the available evidence examining RAGT for pain reduction post-SCI, focusing on NP.
Methods: Six databases were searched from inception to February 18th 2025, using search strings addressing: SCI and RAGT. No date or study type restrictions applied. Studies with SCI populations, delivering RAGT and measuring pain outcomes were included. Meta-analyses were conducted for pain intensity, pain interference (PI) and HRQoL outcomes. Certainty of evidence (COE) was assessed using GRADE criteria.
Results: Thirty two studies (n = 567) (6 RCTs) met eligibility criteria. No RCT mandated pain as an inclusion criterion. Meta-analysis of 6 RCTs (n = 174) identified no effect for RAGT over other interventions for outcomes of overall pain intensity (SMD = 0.03 [-0.40, 0.46]; P = 0.90), non-specified pain-type intensity (SMD = 0.08 [-0.39, 0.55]; P = 0.74) and in one RCT reporting NP intensity (SMD = -0.46 [-1.61, 0.70]; P = 0.44). Meta-analysis identified no difference between RAGT and comparators for outcomes of HRQoL (3 RCTs (n = 69): SMD = 0.15 [-0.33,0.62]; P = 0.54) and PI (2 RCTs (n = 53): SMD = -0.1 [-0.64,0.44]; P = 0.71). Very-low COE for pain intensity & PI and low COE for HRQoL were assigned.
Conclusions: Very limited studies and inconclusive evidence supports RAGT for the reduction of NP post-SCI. Future RCTs of RAGT that recruit patients with moderate-to-severe NP at baseline are required.
期刊介绍:
For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.