Establishing Linguistic Categories for Hearing Aid Experiences in Adults: A Modified Delphi Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Ilze Oosthuizen, Vinaya Manchaiah, Stefan Launer, De Wet Swanepoel
{"title":"Establishing Linguistic Categories for Hearing Aid Experiences in Adults: A Modified Delphi Study.","authors":"Ilze Oosthuizen, Vinaya Manchaiah, Stefan Launer, De Wet Swanepoel","doi":"10.3766/jaaa.240108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Recent advancements in automated natural language processing (NLP) methods and tools have enhanced the efficacy and accuracy of quantitative analysis of natural language data. NLP offers significant potential for audiology by providing valuable insights from open-text responses about users' lived hearing aid experiences.<b>Purpose:</b> This study aimed to establish linguistic categories pertinent to the experiences of adults using hearing aids, with the ultimate goal of developing a specialized text processing module to facilitate natural language analysis of textual data on hearing aid experiences.<b>Research Design:</b> A modified electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) design was employed.<b>Study Sample:</b> A panel of 16 audiology experts from seven countries.<b>Data Collection and Analysis:</b> Two survey rounds were conducted. In round 1, experts rated categories from the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software and categories from principal component analysis of open-ended text data on hearing aid experiences. Experts also responded to open-ended prompts regarding categories derived from qualitative studies on hearing aid experiences. Responses were condensed and refined into items for rating during round 2. In round 2, experts reconsidered their ratings in light of the group answers of round 1. All ratings used a four-point Likert scale of importance. Measures of central tendency, levels of dispersion, and Cronbach's <i>&#945;</i> reliability coefficients were conducted in both rounds for comparative purposes.<b>Results:</b> The open-ended section generated 26 items. Consensus was met on 53 linguistic categories encompassing social (e.g., social situations, social support), emotional (e.g., positive tone, negative tone), cognitive (e.g., cognitive processes, causation), lifestyle (e.g., work, leisure), hearing aid-related (e.g., sound quality, use and handling), and service delivery-related dimensions.<b>Conclusions:</b> The linguistic categories identified provide a foundation for developing a customized LIWC text processing module tailored to the analysis of hearing aid experiences. Future research is needed to refine and validate the custom text processing module.<b>Clinical Relevance Statement:</b> The findings provide a framework to enable the development of a customized hearing aid LIWC dictionary. Such a tool may enhance clinicians' ability to explore hearing aid outcomes and improve patient-centered care by integrating real-world experiences into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.240108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent advancements in automated natural language processing (NLP) methods and tools have enhanced the efficacy and accuracy of quantitative analysis of natural language data. NLP offers significant potential for audiology by providing valuable insights from open-text responses about users' lived hearing aid experiences.Purpose: This study aimed to establish linguistic categories pertinent to the experiences of adults using hearing aids, with the ultimate goal of developing a specialized text processing module to facilitate natural language analysis of textual data on hearing aid experiences.Research Design: A modified electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) design was employed.Study Sample: A panel of 16 audiology experts from seven countries.Data Collection and Analysis: Two survey rounds were conducted. In round 1, experts rated categories from the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software and categories from principal component analysis of open-ended text data on hearing aid experiences. Experts also responded to open-ended prompts regarding categories derived from qualitative studies on hearing aid experiences. Responses were condensed and refined into items for rating during round 2. In round 2, experts reconsidered their ratings in light of the group answers of round 1. All ratings used a four-point Likert scale of importance. Measures of central tendency, levels of dispersion, and Cronbach's α reliability coefficients were conducted in both rounds for comparative purposes.Results: The open-ended section generated 26 items. Consensus was met on 53 linguistic categories encompassing social (e.g., social situations, social support), emotional (e.g., positive tone, negative tone), cognitive (e.g., cognitive processes, causation), lifestyle (e.g., work, leisure), hearing aid-related (e.g., sound quality, use and handling), and service delivery-related dimensions.Conclusions: The linguistic categories identified provide a foundation for developing a customized LIWC text processing module tailored to the analysis of hearing aid experiences. Future research is needed to refine and validate the custom text processing module.Clinical Relevance Statement: The findings provide a framework to enable the development of a customized hearing aid LIWC dictionary. Such a tool may enhance clinicians' ability to explore hearing aid outcomes and improve patient-centered care by integrating real-world experiences into clinical practice.

建立成人助听器经验的语言范畴:一个修正的德尔菲研究。
背景:自动化自然语言处理(NLP)方法和工具的最新进展提高了自然语言数据定量分析的有效性和准确性。NLP通过提供有关用户生活助听器体验的开放文本响应的宝贵见解,为听力学提供了巨大的潜力。目的:本研究旨在建立与成人助听器使用体验相关的语言分类,最终目的是开发一个专门的文本处理模块,以便对助听器使用体验的文本数据进行自然语言分析。研究设计:采用改进的电子德尔菲(e-Delphi)设计。研究样本:由来自7个国家的16名听力学专家组成的小组。数据收集和分析:进行了两轮调查。在第一轮中,专家们对来自语言调查和单词计数(LIWC)软件的类别和来自助听器体验的开放式文本数据的主成分分析的类别进行了评级。专家们还回应了关于助听器体验的定性研究得出的类别的开放式提示。在第2轮中,回答被浓缩并精炼为评分项目。在第二轮中,专家们根据第一轮的集体答案重新考虑他们的评分。所有的评级都使用了4分的李克特重要性量表。集中趋势、分散水平和Cronbach's α;可靠性系数在两轮进行比较的目的。结果:开放式切片共生成26个项目。在53个语言类别上达成了共识,包括社会(例如,社会情境,社会支持),情感(例如,积极语气,消极语气),认知(例如,认知过程,因果关系),生活方式(例如,工作,休闲),助听器相关(例如,音质,使用和处理)以及服务提供相关维度。结论:确定的语言类别为开发针对助听器体验分析的定制LIWC文本处理模块提供了基础。该自定义文本处理模块还需要进一步的研究来完善和验证。临床相关性声明:研究结果为开发定制助听器LIWC词典提供了一个框架。这样的工具可以提高临床医生探索助听器结果的能力,并通过将现实世界的经验整合到临床实践中来改善以患者为中心的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信