Reliability of 2 self-report questionnaires assessing performance of activities of daily living in chronic hand orthotic users.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Tanja Oud, Frans Nollet, Merel-Anne Brehm
{"title":"Reliability of 2 self-report questionnaires assessing performance of activities of daily living in chronic hand orthotic users.","authors":"Tanja Oud, Frans Nollet, Merel-Anne Brehm","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The reliability of Dutch questionnaires assessing performance of activities of daily living (ADL) has not been established in chronic hand orthotic users.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the reliability of the custom short form of the Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Upper Extremity (DF-PROMIS-UE) and the Michigan Hand Questionnaire Dutch language version (MHQ-DLV) in chronic hand orthotic users and evaluate the correlation between the DF-PROMIS-UE and MHQ-DLV ADL domain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-four chronic hand orthotic users (mean [SD] age 60.5 [10.71] years, 60 female) completed the DF-PROMIS-UE and MHQ-DLV twice. Reliability was assessed as internal consistency (Cronbach's α), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient), and agreement (95% limits of agreement, standard error of measurement, smallest detectable change). Furthermore, the Pearson correlation coefficient were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cronbach's α for both ADL questionnaires was ≥0.90. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.93) for the DF-PROMIS-UE and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72-0.88) for the MHQ-DLV ADL domain. The limits of agreement were narrower for the DF-PROMIS-UE (-4.43 to 5.85) than for the MHQ-DLV ADL domain (-27.4 to 26.4). The standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change for the DF-PROMIS-UE were 1.91 and 5.29 points and for MHQ-DLV ADL domain 9.65 and 26.8 points, respectively. The correlation between the ADL questionnaires was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the DF-PROMIS-UE and MHQ-DLV ADL domain were highly correlated and showed good internal consistency, the DF-PROMIS-UE showed better test-retest reliability and lower measurement error than the MHQ-DLV ADL domain in chronic hand orthotic users.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000460","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The reliability of Dutch questionnaires assessing performance of activities of daily living (ADL) has not been established in chronic hand orthotic users.

Objective: To examine the reliability of the custom short form of the Dutch-Flemish Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Upper Extremity (DF-PROMIS-UE) and the Michigan Hand Questionnaire Dutch language version (MHQ-DLV) in chronic hand orthotic users and evaluate the correlation between the DF-PROMIS-UE and MHQ-DLV ADL domain.

Methods: Seventy-four chronic hand orthotic users (mean [SD] age 60.5 [10.71] years, 60 female) completed the DF-PROMIS-UE and MHQ-DLV twice. Reliability was assessed as internal consistency (Cronbach's α), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient), and agreement (95% limits of agreement, standard error of measurement, smallest detectable change). Furthermore, the Pearson correlation coefficient were determined.

Results: Cronbach's α for both ADL questionnaires was ≥0.90. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.93) for the DF-PROMIS-UE and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72-0.88) for the MHQ-DLV ADL domain. The limits of agreement were narrower for the DF-PROMIS-UE (-4.43 to 5.85) than for the MHQ-DLV ADL domain (-27.4 to 26.4). The standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change for the DF-PROMIS-UE were 1.91 and 5.29 points and for MHQ-DLV ADL domain 9.65 and 26.8 points, respectively. The correlation between the ADL questionnaires was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.89).

Conclusions: Although the DF-PROMIS-UE and MHQ-DLV ADL domain were highly correlated and showed good internal consistency, the DF-PROMIS-UE showed better test-retest reliability and lower measurement error than the MHQ-DLV ADL domain in chronic hand orthotic users.

评估慢性手部矫形器使用者日常生活活动表现的两份自我报告问卷的信度。
背景:荷兰问卷评估日常生活活动表现(ADL)的可靠性尚未在慢性手部矫形器使用者中建立。目的:检验荷兰-佛兰德语患者报告结果测量信息系统-上肢(df - promise - ue)和密歇根手部问卷荷兰语版(MHQ-DLV)在慢性手部矫形器使用者中的可靠性,并评价df - promise - ue与MHQ-DLV ADL域的相关性。方法:74例慢性手部矫形器使用者(平均[SD]年龄60.5[10.71]岁,女性60例)完成两次df - promise - ue和MHQ-DLV测试。信度评估为内部一致性(Cronbach’s α)、重测信度(类内相关系数)和一致性(95%一致限、测量标准误差、最小可检测变化)。进一步测定Pearson相关系数。结果:两份ADL问卷的Cronbach’s α均≥0.90。df - promise - ue的类内相关系数为0.88(95%可信区间[CI], 0.82-0.93), MHQ-DLV ADL域的类内相关系数为0.81 (95% CI, 0.72-0.88)。df - promise - ue的一致性范围(-4.43 ~ 5.85)比MHQ-DLV ADL域(-27.4 ~ 26.4)窄。df - promise - ue的测量标准误差和最小可检测变化分别为1.91和5.29分,MHQ-DLV ADL域为9.65和26.8分。ADL问卷之间的相关性为0.83 (95% CI, 0.75 ~ 0.89)。结论:虽然df - promise - ue与MHQ-DLV ADL域高度相关且具有良好的内部一致性,但在慢性手部矫形器使用者中,df - promise - ue比MHQ-DLV ADL域具有更好的重测信度和更小的测量误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信