Associations of objective and perceived social status with well-being in dyads of people with dementia and their caregivers: findings from the IDEAL programme.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Yu-Tzu Wu, Laura D Gamble, Ian Rees Jones, Anthony Martyr, Linda Clare, Fiona E Matthews
{"title":"Associations of objective and perceived social status with well-being in dyads of people with dementia and their caregivers: findings from the IDEAL programme.","authors":"Yu-Tzu Wu, Laura D Gamble, Ian Rees Jones, Anthony Martyr, Linda Clare, Fiona E Matthews","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02933-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Social status is related to disparities in health and well-being outcomes in people with dementia (PwD). Few studies have explored the interpersonal influence of social status of PwD on the well-being of their caregiver, or vice versa. We investigated this relationship using measures of objective and perceived (subjective) social status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The actor-partner interdependence model was used to investigate dyadic relationships of social status and well-being in 1042 PwD and their spousal caregivers from the IDEAL study. Objective indicators of social status included education, social class and socioeconomic classification. Perceived social status included social comparison and ratings of status in society and in one's community.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the objective social status indicators, actor effects were only observed for caregiver education and their own well-being. Actor effects for perceived social status were stronger and independent of objective social status for both PwD and caregivers. Caregiver social status also influenced the well-being of PwD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides empirical evidence on the interpersonal influence of social status, especially perceived social status, on well-being in PwD and caregivers. Interactions between PwD, caregivers and wider society may influence the perception of relative social position and impact on living well with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02933-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Social status is related to disparities in health and well-being outcomes in people with dementia (PwD). Few studies have explored the interpersonal influence of social status of PwD on the well-being of their caregiver, or vice versa. We investigated this relationship using measures of objective and perceived (subjective) social status.

Methods: The actor-partner interdependence model was used to investigate dyadic relationships of social status and well-being in 1042 PwD and their spousal caregivers from the IDEAL study. Objective indicators of social status included education, social class and socioeconomic classification. Perceived social status included social comparison and ratings of status in society and in one's community.

Results: Of the objective social status indicators, actor effects were only observed for caregiver education and their own well-being. Actor effects for perceived social status were stronger and independent of objective social status for both PwD and caregivers. Caregiver social status also influenced the well-being of PwD.

Conclusion: This study provides empirical evidence on the interpersonal influence of social status, especially perceived social status, on well-being in PwD and caregivers. Interactions between PwD, caregivers and wider society may influence the perception of relative social position and impact on living well with dementia.

客观和感知的社会地位与痴呆患者及其照顾者的幸福的关联:来自IDEAL项目的研究结果。
目的:社会地位与痴呆症患者(PwD)健康和福祉结果的差异有关。很少有研究探讨残疾人的社会地位对其照顾者幸福感的人际影响,反之亦然。我们使用客观和感知(主观)社会地位的测量来调查这种关系。方法:采用行动者-伴侣相互依赖模型对IDEAL研究中1042名残疾人及其配偶照顾者的社会地位与幸福感的二元关系进行研究。社会地位的客观指标包括教育程度、社会阶层和社会经济分类。感知到的社会地位包括社会比较和对自己在社会和社区中的地位的评价。结果:在客观社会地位指标中,行动者效应仅在照顾者教育和自身幸福感方面存在。对残疾患者和照顾者而言,感知社会地位的行动者效应更强,且独立于客观社会地位。照顾者的社会地位也会影响残疾人的幸福感。结论:本研究为社会地位,尤其是感知社会地位对残疾人及其照顾者幸福感的人际影响提供了实证证据。残疾人、照顾者和更广泛的社会之间的相互作用可能会影响对相对社会地位的看法和对痴呆症患者生活的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信