Undergraduate Nursing Students' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Academia.

IF 2.9 Q2 NURSING
Michelle Lam, Nassim Adhami, Olivia Du, Riley Huntley, Abdul-Fatawu Abdulai, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Lillian Hung
{"title":"Undergraduate Nursing Students' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in Academia.","authors":"Michelle Lam, Nassim Adhami, Olivia Du, Riley Huntley, Abdul-Fatawu Abdulai, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Lillian Hung","doi":"10.1177/08445621251347025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools becoming increasingly commonplace, the usage of AI-enabled tools in education has also grown. AI-enabled tools refer to machines incorporated with human-like capabilities, such as reasoning, interpretation, and problem-solving, to perform tasks that require human intelligence. ChatGPT is one of these tools, which uses large language models (LLM), a type of AI that generates natural language, to give human-like answers to questions. This study investigated nursing students' perspectives on AI-enabled tools, such as ChatGPT, aiming to identify (1) perceived benefits and challenges and (2) implications for the ethical and responsible use of AI within undergraduate nursing programs. Using interpretive description, we conducted focus group interviews with undergraduate nursing students. Through convenience sampling, sixteen students were recruited. Our findings revealed four key themes - utilization as a support tool, utilization leading to a loss of competency in foundational skills, utilization risking credibility and academic integrity, and the need for further education and resources. Three key factors - evidence-based practice, ethical considerations, and the importance of critical thinking skills - influence nursing students' perspectives toward AI tools. To ensure the safe and ethical use of AI in academia, robust institutional policies and training are needed. Promoting open dialogues and education can help students understand AI's advantages, potential harms, and risk mitigation strategies. Future research should build a comprehensive understanding of the perspectives of undergraduate and graduate nursing students, and educators on AI usage in academia. Development of interventions that mitigate AI-usage risks is also necessary to improve integration into education.</p>","PeriodicalId":46661,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"8445621251347025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08445621251347025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools becoming increasingly commonplace, the usage of AI-enabled tools in education has also grown. AI-enabled tools refer to machines incorporated with human-like capabilities, such as reasoning, interpretation, and problem-solving, to perform tasks that require human intelligence. ChatGPT is one of these tools, which uses large language models (LLM), a type of AI that generates natural language, to give human-like answers to questions. This study investigated nursing students' perspectives on AI-enabled tools, such as ChatGPT, aiming to identify (1) perceived benefits and challenges and (2) implications for the ethical and responsible use of AI within undergraduate nursing programs. Using interpretive description, we conducted focus group interviews with undergraduate nursing students. Through convenience sampling, sixteen students were recruited. Our findings revealed four key themes - utilization as a support tool, utilization leading to a loss of competency in foundational skills, utilization risking credibility and academic integrity, and the need for further education and resources. Three key factors - evidence-based practice, ethical considerations, and the importance of critical thinking skills - influence nursing students' perspectives toward AI tools. To ensure the safe and ethical use of AI in academia, robust institutional policies and training are needed. Promoting open dialogues and education can help students understand AI's advantages, potential harms, and risk mitigation strategies. Future research should build a comprehensive understanding of the perspectives of undergraduate and graduate nursing students, and educators on AI usage in academia. Development of interventions that mitigate AI-usage risks is also necessary to improve integration into education.

护理本科生对学术界人工智能的看法。
随着人工智能(AI)工具变得越来越普遍,人工智能工具在教育中的使用也越来越多。人工智能工具是指具有类似人类能力的机器,如推理、解释和解决问题,以执行需要人类智能的任务。ChatGPT就是其中一种工具,它使用大型语言模型(LLM),一种生成自然语言的人工智能,为问题提供类似人类的答案。本研究调查了护理专业学生对人工智能工具(如ChatGPT)的看法,旨在确定(1)感知到的好处和挑战,以及(2)在本科护理课程中道德和负责任地使用人工智能的影响。采用解释性描述法,对护理本科学生进行焦点小组访谈。通过方便抽样,共招募了16名学生。我们的研究结果揭示了四个关键主题:作为支持工具的使用,导致基本技能能力的丧失,信誉和学术诚信的风险,以及对进一步教育和资源的需求。三个关键因素——循证实践、伦理考虑和批判性思维技能的重要性——影响着护理专业学生对人工智能工具的看法。为了确保人工智能在学术界的安全和道德使用,需要强有力的制度政策和培训。促进公开对话和教育可以帮助学生了解人工智能的优势、潜在危害和风险缓解策略。未来的研究应该全面了解本科和研究生护理学生以及教育工作者对学术界人工智能使用的看法。制定降低人工智能使用风险的干预措施对于改善教育整合也是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: We are pleased to announce the launch of the CJNR digital archive, an online archive available through the McGill University Library, and hosted by the McGill University Library Digital Collections Program in perpetuity. This archive has been made possible through a Richard M. Tomlinson Digital Library Innovation and Access Award to the McGill School of Nursing. The Richard M. Tomlinson award recognizes the ongoing contribution and commitment the CJNR has made to the McGill School of Nursing, and to the development and nursing science in Canada and worldwide. We hope this archive proves to be an invaluable research tool for researchers in Nursing and other faculties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信