Patient-Reported Experiences of Home-Based Breathing Exercises After Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Questionnaire-Based Cohort Study.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2025-06-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735251348849
Elisabeth Westerdahl, Charlotte Urell, Henrik Johansson, Barbara Cristina Brocki, Marcus Jonsson
{"title":"Patient-Reported Experiences of Home-Based Breathing Exercises After Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Questionnaire-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Elisabeth Westerdahl, Charlotte Urell, Henrik Johansson, Barbara Cristina Brocki, Marcus Jonsson","doi":"10.1177/23743735251348849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed patient-reported experiences and perceived respiratory outcomes of home-based deep breathing exercises 3 months after cardiac surgery. A postal questionnaire was sent to 120 patients at a Swedish university hospital, with 92 respondents (77%). The majority (89%) performed breathing exercises after discharge, with 77% reporting them as very easy to perform. Most patients continued the exercises for 2 to 4 weeks (41%) or 1 to 2 months (20%), typically practicing 3 times per day. The exercises were well tolerated, with 87% experiencing no discomfort. Motivation was generally high-43% felt very motivated, and 78% found the exercises useful. While chest pain was reported as low and 56% experienced improved breathing, nearly half of the respondents reported difficulties with coughing, and 10% sought medical care for respiratory infections. Overall, home-based deep breathing exercises were perceived as beneficial and well accepted. However, engagement and adherence varied, highlighting the need for tailored support to encourage sustained participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"12 ","pages":"23743735251348849"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12138212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735251348849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed patient-reported experiences and perceived respiratory outcomes of home-based deep breathing exercises 3 months after cardiac surgery. A postal questionnaire was sent to 120 patients at a Swedish university hospital, with 92 respondents (77%). The majority (89%) performed breathing exercises after discharge, with 77% reporting them as very easy to perform. Most patients continued the exercises for 2 to 4 weeks (41%) or 1 to 2 months (20%), typically practicing 3 times per day. The exercises were well tolerated, with 87% experiencing no discomfort. Motivation was generally high-43% felt very motivated, and 78% found the exercises useful. While chest pain was reported as low and 56% experienced improved breathing, nearly half of the respondents reported difficulties with coughing, and 10% sought medical care for respiratory infections. Overall, home-based deep breathing exercises were perceived as beneficial and well accepted. However, engagement and adherence varied, highlighting the need for tailored support to encourage sustained participation.

心脏手术后患者报告的家庭呼吸练习经历:一项前瞻性问卷队列研究。
本研究评估了心脏手术后3个月患者报告的在家深呼吸练习的经历和感知的呼吸结果。向瑞典一所大学医院的120名患者邮寄了一份调查问卷,有92名答复者(77%)。大多数人(89%)在出院后进行呼吸练习,77%的人报告说这些练习非常容易进行。大多数患者持续练习2 - 4周(41%)或1 - 2个月(20%),通常每天练习3次。这些运动的耐受性很好,87%的人没有感到不适。人们的积极性普遍很高——43%的人感到非常有动力,78%的人认为锻炼很有用。虽然据报道胸痛较低,56%的人呼吸改善,但近一半的受访者报告咳嗽困难,10%的人因呼吸道感染寻求医疗护理。总的来说,基于家庭的深呼吸练习被认为是有益的,并且被广泛接受。然而,参与和遵守情况各不相同,突出表明需要有针对性的支持,以鼓励持续参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信