Factors associated with coronary artery bypass grafting excess readmission ratios.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-04 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2025.109462
Tyler Zander, Melissa A Kendall, Emily A Grimsley, Paul C Kuo
{"title":"Factors associated with coronary artery bypass grafting excess readmission ratios.","authors":"Tyler Zander, Melissa A Kendall, Emily A Grimsley, Paul C Kuo","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program determines Medicare readmission penalties through risk-adjusted excess readmissions ratios. This study uses interpretable machine learning to identify associations with coronary artery bypass grafting excess readmissions ratios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration database (2017-2019) was queried for patients with Medicare who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and linked to Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program and RAND Hospital data. Univariable analysis compared hospitals above compared with below the median excess readmissions ratios. LightGBM and XGBoost modeled excess readmissions ratios using patient data. SHapley Additive exPlanations were used for interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort had 7,776 patients from 64 hospitals. Hospitals above the median excess readmissions ratios had more emergent admissions (35.4 vs 29.8%, P < .01), greater mortality (2.1 vs 1.3%, P < .01), and more expensive postoperative care charges (P < .01). Models had mean absolute errors <0.06 and R<sup>2</sup> > 0.79. SHapley Additive exPlanations revealed charges and length of stay as most influential. Greater postoperative care charges and shorter length of stay were associated with greater excess readmissions ratios.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hospitals with greater excess readmissions ratios charge more for postoperative care. Whether this association is caused by hospital differences alone or also by unadjusted differences in patient severity and functional status is unknown. The association of shorter length of stay with greater excess readmissions ratios could suggest that hospitals with greater excess readmissions ratios discharge patients too early. Future research should investigate the causes of these associations and their impact on excess readmissions ratios to ensure that hospitals are not unfairly penalized.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"109462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2025.109462","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program determines Medicare readmission penalties through risk-adjusted excess readmissions ratios. This study uses interpretable machine learning to identify associations with coronary artery bypass grafting excess readmissions ratios.

Methods: Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration database (2017-2019) was queried for patients with Medicare who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and linked to Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program and RAND Hospital data. Univariable analysis compared hospitals above compared with below the median excess readmissions ratios. LightGBM and XGBoost modeled excess readmissions ratios using patient data. SHapley Additive exPlanations were used for interpretation.

Results: The cohort had 7,776 patients from 64 hospitals. Hospitals above the median excess readmissions ratios had more emergent admissions (35.4 vs 29.8%, P < .01), greater mortality (2.1 vs 1.3%, P < .01), and more expensive postoperative care charges (P < .01). Models had mean absolute errors <0.06 and R2 > 0.79. SHapley Additive exPlanations revealed charges and length of stay as most influential. Greater postoperative care charges and shorter length of stay were associated with greater excess readmissions ratios.

Conclusion: Hospitals with greater excess readmissions ratios charge more for postoperative care. Whether this association is caused by hospital differences alone or also by unadjusted differences in patient severity and functional status is unknown. The association of shorter length of stay with greater excess readmissions ratios could suggest that hospitals with greater excess readmissions ratios discharge patients too early. Future research should investigate the causes of these associations and their impact on excess readmissions ratios to ensure that hospitals are not unfairly penalized.

冠状动脉旁路移植术再入院率的相关因素。
背景:医院再入院减少计划通过风险调整的超额再入院比率来确定医疗保险再入院处罚。本研究使用可解释的机器学习来识别与冠状动脉旁路移植术过量再入院率的关联。方法:查询佛罗里达州医疗管理局数据库(2017-2019)中接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的医疗保险患者,并将其与医院再入院减少计划和兰德医院数据相关联。单变量分析比较医院高于和低于中位数的超额再入院率。LightGBM和XGBoost使用患者数据模拟了多余的再入院率。采用SHapley加性解释进行解释。结果:该队列共纳入来自64家医院的7776例患者。高于中位数超额再入院率的医院急诊住院率更高(35.4 vs 29.8%, P < 0.01),死亡率更高(2.1 vs 1.3%, P < 0.01),术后护理费用更高(P < 0.01)。模型的平均绝对误差为2 ~ 0.79。SHapley加法解释显示费用和逗留时间是最具影响力的。较高的术后护理费用和较短的住院时间与较高的再入院率相关。结论:超额再入院率高的医院术后护理费用高。这种关联是否仅由医院差异引起,还是由患者严重程度和功能状态的未调整差异引起尚不清楚。较短的住院时间与较高的再入院率的关联可能表明,较高的再入院率的医院过早地将患者出院。未来的研究应调查这些关联的原因及其对超额再入院率的影响,以确保医院不会受到不公平的惩罚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信