Mode of delivery after induction of labour in pregnant women with pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening Pub Date : 2025-05-21 Print Date: 2025-06-03 DOI:10.4045/tidsskr.24.0643
Åshild Bjørnerem, Caroline Renland Kolstad, Tonje Agnete Gravvold Helmersen, Trond Melbye Michelsen, Ingvil Krarup Sørbye
{"title":"Mode of delivery after induction of labour in pregnant women with pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity.","authors":"Åshild Bjørnerem, Caroline Renland Kolstad, Tonje Agnete Gravvold Helmersen, Trond Melbye Michelsen, Ingvil Krarup Sørbye","doi":"10.4045/tidsskr.24.0643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The proportion of pregnant women with overweight or obesity whose labour is induced is increasing. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and mode of delivery among pregnant women whose labour was induced.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>The study included women with singleton pregnancies, a fetus in cephalic presentation and a liveborn child, whose labour was induced at the University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø in the period 2016-18. The mode of delivery was compared for women with a pre-pregnancy BMI < 25 kg/m2, overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study, we included 807 women whose labour was induced. Of these, 402 had a pre-pregnancy BMI < 25 kg/m2, 202 had overweight and 203 had obesity. Of these, 306 (76.1 %), 149 (73.8 %) and 140 (69.0 %) had a spontaneous birth, while 60 (14.9 %), 40 (19.8 %) and 44 (21.7 %) had a caesarean section. As pre-pregnancy BMI increased, the proportion of spontaneous births decreased (p = 0.06), while the proportion delivered by caesarean section increased (p = 0.03). Women with obesity whose labour was induced were at a higher risk of caesarean section (odds ratio 1.6 (95 % confidence interval 1.0-2.4)) compared to those with a BMI < 25 kg/m2. After adjusting for age, height, prolonged rupture of membranes, parity and previous mode of delivery, the odds ratio remained virtually unchanged, but was no longer statistically significant (odds ratio 1.5 (95 % CI 0.9-2.4)).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Pre-pregnancy obesity was linked to a higher risk of caesarean section following induced labour, but the risk was more significantly influenced by being primiparous or multiparous without a prior vaginal delivery than by obesity itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":23123,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening","volume":"145 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.24.0643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The proportion of pregnant women with overweight or obesity whose labour is induced is increasing. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and mode of delivery among pregnant women whose labour was induced.

Material and method: The study included women with singleton pregnancies, a fetus in cephalic presentation and a liveborn child, whose labour was induced at the University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø in the period 2016-18. The mode of delivery was compared for women with a pre-pregnancy BMI < 25 kg/m2, overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2).

Results: In the study, we included 807 women whose labour was induced. Of these, 402 had a pre-pregnancy BMI < 25 kg/m2, 202 had overweight and 203 had obesity. Of these, 306 (76.1 %), 149 (73.8 %) and 140 (69.0 %) had a spontaneous birth, while 60 (14.9 %), 40 (19.8 %) and 44 (21.7 %) had a caesarean section. As pre-pregnancy BMI increased, the proportion of spontaneous births decreased (p = 0.06), while the proportion delivered by caesarean section increased (p = 0.03). Women with obesity whose labour was induced were at a higher risk of caesarean section (odds ratio 1.6 (95 % confidence interval 1.0-2.4)) compared to those with a BMI < 25 kg/m2. After adjusting for age, height, prolonged rupture of membranes, parity and previous mode of delivery, the odds ratio remained virtually unchanged, but was no longer statistically significant (odds ratio 1.5 (95 % CI 0.9-2.4)).

Interpretation: Pre-pregnancy obesity was linked to a higher risk of caesarean section following induced labour, but the risk was more significantly influenced by being primiparous or multiparous without a prior vaginal delivery than by obesity itself.

孕前超重和肥胖孕妇引产后的分娩方式。
背景:超重或肥胖孕妇引产的比例正在增加。本研究旨在探讨引产孕妇孕前体重指数(BMI)与分娩方式之间的关系。材料和方法:该研究包括2016- 2018年期间在特罗姆瑟北挪威大学医院引产的单胎妊娠妇女、一名头位胎儿和一名活产婴儿。比较孕前BMI < 25 kg/m2、超重(BMI 25.0 ~ 29.9 kg/m2)和肥胖(BMI≥30 kg/m2)妇女的分娩方式。结果:本研究纳入了807例引产妇女。其中,402人孕前BMI < 25 kg/m2, 202人超重,203人肥胖。其中自然分娩306例(76.1%)、149例(73.8%)、140例(69.0%),剖宫产60例(14.9%)、40例(19.8%)、44例(21.7%)。随着孕前BMI的升高,顺产比例降低(p = 0.06),剖宫产比例增加(p = 0.03)。与BMI < 25 kg/m2的妇女相比,引产的肥胖妇女剖腹产的风险更高(优势比1.6(95%可信区间1.0-2.4))。在调整了年龄、身高、胎次、胎次和以前的分娩方式后,优势比几乎保持不变,但不再具有统计学意义(优势比为1.5 (95% CI 0.9-2.4))。解释:孕前肥胖与引产后剖腹产的高风险相关,但未阴道分娩的初产或多产对风险的影响比肥胖本身更显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening
Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
593
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信