"Vetus Sed Utilis": Open Window Thoracostomy after Lung Surgery.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Antonio Mazzella, Claudia Bardoni, Luca Bertolaccini, Monica Casiraghi, Lara Girelli, Giorgio Lo Iacono, Lorenzo Spaggiari
{"title":"\"Vetus Sed Utilis\": Open Window Thoracostomy after Lung Surgery.","authors":"Antonio Mazzella, Claudia Bardoni, Luca Bertolaccini, Monica Casiraghi, Lara Girelli, Giorgio Lo Iacono, Lorenzo Spaggiari","doi":"10.1055/a-2616-5012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Open window thoracostomy (OWT) is an ancient surgical intervention, born for managing chronic thoracic infectious diseases. Our goal is to report our 25-year experience in the management of these patients, focusing on its feasibility and usefulness in our modern era.We retrospectively reviewed our database (1999-2024), reporting all clinical preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data of patients undergoing OWT for treating chronic empyema, linked to broncho-pleural fistula after lung resection, or not. Data were collected on the type of original surgical intervention, perioperative and postoperative management, 30- and 90-day mortality, overall survival, and following reintervention to close OWT.Sixty-six OWTs were performed to treat acute and chronic septic complications due to original lung intervention for cancer. OWT was performed for treating a late broncho-pleural fistula after pneumonectomy (56 cases; 85%) or after lobectomy (8 cases; 12%) or pleural chronic empyema (2 cases; 3%). Thirty- and 90-day mortality after OWT following pneumonectomy was 3% (2 patients) and 6% (4 patients), respectively. No 30- and 90-day death was observed in the other patients. In 15 out of 66 patients (22.7%), OWT was closed by muscle, skin, or omentum flaps. No statistical differences were observed comparing the survival of the patients undergoing or not undergoing OWT closure, after pneumonectomy (<i>p</i> = 0.59).OWT is a safe, feasible, and sometimes mandatory technique for the management of chronic infectious issues linked to broncho-pleural fistula (BPF) after lung surgery. It is well tolerated by guaranteeing an appropriate quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2616-5012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Open window thoracostomy (OWT) is an ancient surgical intervention, born for managing chronic thoracic infectious diseases. Our goal is to report our 25-year experience in the management of these patients, focusing on its feasibility and usefulness in our modern era.We retrospectively reviewed our database (1999-2024), reporting all clinical preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data of patients undergoing OWT for treating chronic empyema, linked to broncho-pleural fistula after lung resection, or not. Data were collected on the type of original surgical intervention, perioperative and postoperative management, 30- and 90-day mortality, overall survival, and following reintervention to close OWT.Sixty-six OWTs were performed to treat acute and chronic septic complications due to original lung intervention for cancer. OWT was performed for treating a late broncho-pleural fistula after pneumonectomy (56 cases; 85%) or after lobectomy (8 cases; 12%) or pleural chronic empyema (2 cases; 3%). Thirty- and 90-day mortality after OWT following pneumonectomy was 3% (2 patients) and 6% (4 patients), respectively. No 30- and 90-day death was observed in the other patients. In 15 out of 66 patients (22.7%), OWT was closed by muscle, skin, or omentum flaps. No statistical differences were observed comparing the survival of the patients undergoing or not undergoing OWT closure, after pneumonectomy (p = 0.59).OWT is a safe, feasible, and sometimes mandatory technique for the management of chronic infectious issues linked to broncho-pleural fistula (BPF) after lung surgery. It is well tolerated by guaranteeing an appropriate quality of life.

“Vetus Sed Utilis”:肺部手术后开窗开胸术。
开窗胸廓造口术(OWT)是一种古老的手术干预,诞生于治疗慢性胸部感染性疾病。我们的目标是报告我们25年来在这些患者管理方面的经验,重点是其在现代的可行性和实用性。我们回顾性地回顾了我们的数据库(1999-2024),报告了所有接受OWT治疗慢性脓胸的患者的临床术前、术中和术后数据,这些患者在肺切除术后是否伴有支气管胸膜瘘。收集原始手术干预类型、围手术期和术后管理、30天和90天死亡率、总生存率以及再次干预以关闭OWT的数据。对66例因肺癌而进行肺部干预的急性和慢性脓毒性并发症进行了wts治疗。结果:肺切除术后晚期支气管胸膜瘘56例;85%)或肺叶切除术后(8例;12%)或胸膜慢性脓胸(2例;3%)。肺切除术后wt术后30天和90天死亡率分别为3%(2例)和6%(4例)。其他患者未见30天和90天死亡。66例患者中有15例(22.7%)通过肌肉、皮肤或网膜皮瓣关闭OWT。在全肺切除术后,行与不行OWT闭合术患者的生存率比较无统计学差异(p = 0.59)。对于肺部手术后与支气管胸膜瘘(BPF)相关的慢性感染性问题,OWT是一种安全、可行、有时是强制性的技术。它通过保证适当的生活质量而得到很好的容忍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon publishes articles of the highest standard from internationally recognized thoracic and cardiovascular surgeons, cardiologists, anesthesiologists, physiologists, and pathologists. This journal is an essential resource for anyone working in this field. Original articles, short communications, reviews and important meeting announcements keep you abreast of key clinical advances, as well as providing the theoretical background of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. Case reports are published in our Open Access companion journal The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信