Stine Monsen, Eamonn Walsh, Denise Cadete, Lucia Garrido, Elisa Raffaella Ferrè, Matthew Longo
{"title":"EXPRESS: The Face Size Illusion is Specific to Human Faces.","authors":"Stine Monsen, Eamonn Walsh, Denise Cadete, Lucia Garrido, Elisa Raffaella Ferrè, Matthew Longo","doi":"10.1177/17470218251351017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The faces of conspecifics are a critical feature of our social world. The visual system includes specialised processes for perceiving upright faces, which are not engaged to the same extent when faces are inverted (the face inversion effect). Recently, a face size illusion has been described in which upright faces are perceived as physically smaller than identical inverted faces. This effect appears highly specific to faces, and does not occur for other stimuli, such as objects, hands, bodies, and letters. We investigated whether this face size illusion is specific to faces in general or to human faces in particular. On each trial, participants saw two faces, one upright and one inverted, and judged which face appeared physically larger. Across blocks, participants saw faces of humans, monkeys, and cats. For human faces, there was a clear bias for upright faces to be perceived as smaller than inverted ones, consistent with previous findings. No such effect was found for faces of cats or of monkeys, for which there was a significant bias in the opposite direction. These results provide further evidence for the specificity of the face size illusion, showing that it is specific not just to faces, but to human faces.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251351017"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251351017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The faces of conspecifics are a critical feature of our social world. The visual system includes specialised processes for perceiving upright faces, which are not engaged to the same extent when faces are inverted (the face inversion effect). Recently, a face size illusion has been described in which upright faces are perceived as physically smaller than identical inverted faces. This effect appears highly specific to faces, and does not occur for other stimuli, such as objects, hands, bodies, and letters. We investigated whether this face size illusion is specific to faces in general or to human faces in particular. On each trial, participants saw two faces, one upright and one inverted, and judged which face appeared physically larger. Across blocks, participants saw faces of humans, monkeys, and cats. For human faces, there was a clear bias for upright faces to be perceived as smaller than inverted ones, consistent with previous findings. No such effect was found for faces of cats or of monkeys, for which there was a significant bias in the opposite direction. These results provide further evidence for the specificity of the face size illusion, showing that it is specific not just to faces, but to human faces.
期刊介绍:
Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling.
QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form.
The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.