Alicia Forsberg, Clément Belletier, Agnieszka Graham, Stephen Rhodes, Pierre Barrouillet, Valerie Camos, Nelson Cowan, Moshe Naveh-Benjamin, Robert H Logie
{"title":"EXPRESS: Different measures of working memory decline at different rates across adult ageing, and dual task costs plateau in mid life.","authors":"Alicia Forsberg, Clément Belletier, Agnieszka Graham, Stephen Rhodes, Pierre Barrouillet, Valerie Camos, Nelson Cowan, Moshe Naveh-Benjamin, Robert H Logie","doi":"10.1177/17470218251351307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Working memory allows us to store information in mind over brief time periods while engaging in other information-processing activities. As such, this system supports cognitive dual-tasking, that is, remembering information while performing a concurrent processing task. Age-related dual-task deficits have been proposed as a critical feature of lifespan cognitive decline. However, evidence regarding such deficits has been mixed, and knowledge of the conditions under which such deficits appear remains elusive. Moreover, several studies have suggested that different aspects of working memory decline at different rates with age and that age-related change is not necessarily linear. We explored lifespan changes in 539 participants (aged 15-90 years) on several memory, processing, and dual (combined) tasks. We addressed two research questions: (1) Does the magnitude of dual-task costs change across the lifespan? (2) Do different measures of memory, processing, and dual-tasking, all decline at the same rate with age? We found that younger-young adults outperformed all other participants on dual-task measures. However, deficits did not appear to increase from the age of 35 years into older age, suggesting that dual-task ability declined in early adulthood but not thereafter between midlife and older age. Processing performance appeared to decline linearly and more rapidly with age than memory performance. Our finding that for some measures, the largest changes occurred in the transition from early to middle adulthood, provides an interesting contrast to the widely held assumption that cognition declines continuously across the adult lifespan.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251351307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251351307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Working memory allows us to store information in mind over brief time periods while engaging in other information-processing activities. As such, this system supports cognitive dual-tasking, that is, remembering information while performing a concurrent processing task. Age-related dual-task deficits have been proposed as a critical feature of lifespan cognitive decline. However, evidence regarding such deficits has been mixed, and knowledge of the conditions under which such deficits appear remains elusive. Moreover, several studies have suggested that different aspects of working memory decline at different rates with age and that age-related change is not necessarily linear. We explored lifespan changes in 539 participants (aged 15-90 years) on several memory, processing, and dual (combined) tasks. We addressed two research questions: (1) Does the magnitude of dual-task costs change across the lifespan? (2) Do different measures of memory, processing, and dual-tasking, all decline at the same rate with age? We found that younger-young adults outperformed all other participants on dual-task measures. However, deficits did not appear to increase from the age of 35 years into older age, suggesting that dual-task ability declined in early adulthood but not thereafter between midlife and older age. Processing performance appeared to decline linearly and more rapidly with age than memory performance. Our finding that for some measures, the largest changes occurred in the transition from early to middle adulthood, provides an interesting contrast to the widely held assumption that cognition declines continuously across the adult lifespan.
期刊介绍:
Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling.
QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form.
The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.