EXPRESS: Different measures of working memory decline at different rates across adult ageing, and dual task costs plateau in mid life.

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Alicia Forsberg, Clément Belletier, Agnieszka Graham, Stephen Rhodes, Pierre Barrouillet, Valerie Camos, Nelson Cowan, Moshe Naveh-Benjamin, Robert H Logie
{"title":"EXPRESS: Different measures of working memory decline at different rates across adult ageing, and dual task costs plateau in mid life.","authors":"Alicia Forsberg, Clément Belletier, Agnieszka Graham, Stephen Rhodes, Pierre Barrouillet, Valerie Camos, Nelson Cowan, Moshe Naveh-Benjamin, Robert H Logie","doi":"10.1177/17470218251351307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Working memory allows us to store information in mind over brief time periods while engaging in other information-processing activities. As such, this system supports cognitive dual-tasking, that is, remembering information while performing a concurrent processing task. Age-related dual-task deficits have been proposed as a critical feature of lifespan cognitive decline. However, evidence regarding such deficits has been mixed, and knowledge of the conditions under which such deficits appear remains elusive. Moreover, several studies have suggested that different aspects of working memory decline at different rates with age and that age-related change is not necessarily linear. We explored lifespan changes in 539 participants (aged 15-90 years) on several memory, processing, and dual (combined) tasks. We addressed two research questions: (1) Does the magnitude of dual-task costs change across the lifespan? (2) Do different measures of memory, processing, and dual-tasking, all decline at the same rate with age? We found that younger-young adults outperformed all other participants on dual-task measures. However, deficits did not appear to increase from the age of 35 years into older age, suggesting that dual-task ability declined in early adulthood but not thereafter between midlife and older age. Processing performance appeared to decline linearly and more rapidly with age than memory performance. Our finding that for some measures, the largest changes occurred in the transition from early to middle adulthood, provides an interesting contrast to the widely held assumption that cognition declines continuously across the adult lifespan.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251351307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251351307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Working memory allows us to store information in mind over brief time periods while engaging in other information-processing activities. As such, this system supports cognitive dual-tasking, that is, remembering information while performing a concurrent processing task. Age-related dual-task deficits have been proposed as a critical feature of lifespan cognitive decline. However, evidence regarding such deficits has been mixed, and knowledge of the conditions under which such deficits appear remains elusive. Moreover, several studies have suggested that different aspects of working memory decline at different rates with age and that age-related change is not necessarily linear. We explored lifespan changes in 539 participants (aged 15-90 years) on several memory, processing, and dual (combined) tasks. We addressed two research questions: (1) Does the magnitude of dual-task costs change across the lifespan? (2) Do different measures of memory, processing, and dual-tasking, all decline at the same rate with age? We found that younger-young adults outperformed all other participants on dual-task measures. However, deficits did not appear to increase from the age of 35 years into older age, suggesting that dual-task ability declined in early adulthood but not thereafter between midlife and older age. Processing performance appeared to decline linearly and more rapidly with age than memory performance. Our finding that for some measures, the largest changes occurred in the transition from early to middle adulthood, provides an interesting contrast to the widely held assumption that cognition declines continuously across the adult lifespan.

不同的工作记忆指标在成年过程中以不同的速度下降,而双重任务成本在中年阶段趋于平稳。
工作记忆允许我们在从事其他信息处理活动的同时,在短时间内将信息存储在脑海中。因此,该系统支持认知双重任务,即在执行并发处理任务的同时记住信息。与年龄相关的双任务缺陷被认为是终身认知衰退的一个重要特征。然而,关于这种缺陷的证据是混杂的,而且对这种缺陷出现的条件的了解仍然难以捉摸。此外,一些研究表明,随着年龄的增长,工作记忆的不同方面以不同的速度下降,与年龄相关的变化不一定是线性的。我们研究了539名参与者(15-90岁)在几个记忆、处理和双重(组合)任务上的寿命变化。我们解决了两个研究问题:(1)在整个生命周期中,双重任务成本的大小是否会发生变化?(2)随着年龄的增长,不同的记忆力、处理能力和双重任务能力是否都会以相同的速度下降?我们发现年轻人在双任务测试中表现优于其他所有参与者。然而,从35岁到老年,这种缺陷似乎并没有增加,这表明双重任务能力在成年早期下降,但在中年和老年之间没有下降。处理能力随着年龄的增长呈线性下降,而且下降速度比记忆能力快。我们的研究发现,对于某些指标来说,最大的变化发生在从成年早期到中年的过渡时期,这与人们普遍认为的认知能力在成年期间持续下降的假设形成了有趣的对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信