Understanding motivations of older women to continue or discontinue breast cancer screening.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0319141
Susan C Weller, Monique R Pappadis, Shilpa Krishnan, Marsja R Stearnes, Kristin M Sheffield, Alai Tan, Jeffrey Z Qi, James S Goodwin
{"title":"Understanding motivations of older women to continue or discontinue breast cancer screening.","authors":"Susan C Weller, Monique R Pappadis, Shilpa Krishnan, Marsja R Stearnes, Kristin M Sheffield, Alai Tan, Jeffrey Z Qi, James S Goodwin","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0319141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer screening guidelines indicate screening in women over 75 years of age is optional, depending upon patient health and preferences. To better understand the preferences and decision-making of older women, their experiences and perceptions concerning screening need to be linked to their intention to continue or discontinue screening. This study used a qualitative comparative analysis to identify the characteristics and themes linked to the intention to continue or discontinue screening. To capture the range of experiences and preferences, a purposive sample of community-residing adults (n = 59) was selected with equal representation of White, Black, and Hispanic women by age (70-74 years and 75 and older) and educational level (≤12 grade and >12 grade). In-depth qualitative interviews explored women's perceptions of mammograms, the benefits and risks of screening, and personal screening experiences. Interviews were coded and quality-checked by two or more coders. A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) identified combinations of personal characteristics and themes linked to the intention to continue (n = 32) or discontinue (n = 27) screening. Results indicated personal experiences were strongly linked to the intention to continue or discontinue. Women who mentioned recent screening (within three years) and either a spontaneously mentioned cancer story concerning a friend or family member or a doctor's screening recommendation intended to continue screening (91% true positive rate, model sensitivity). Women who did not schedule screening and who did not mention a cancer story or a doctor's recommendation (or neither) intended to discontinue screening (81% true negative rate, model specificity). These experiences transcended differences in race/ethnicity, age, and educational level. Continuation of breast cancer screening in older women is motivated by their personal screening history combined with cancer experiences and/or a doctor's screening recommendation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0319141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breast cancer screening guidelines indicate screening in women over 75 years of age is optional, depending upon patient health and preferences. To better understand the preferences and decision-making of older women, their experiences and perceptions concerning screening need to be linked to their intention to continue or discontinue screening. This study used a qualitative comparative analysis to identify the characteristics and themes linked to the intention to continue or discontinue screening. To capture the range of experiences and preferences, a purposive sample of community-residing adults (n = 59) was selected with equal representation of White, Black, and Hispanic women by age (70-74 years and 75 and older) and educational level (≤12 grade and >12 grade). In-depth qualitative interviews explored women's perceptions of mammograms, the benefits and risks of screening, and personal screening experiences. Interviews were coded and quality-checked by two or more coders. A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) identified combinations of personal characteristics and themes linked to the intention to continue (n = 32) or discontinue (n = 27) screening. Results indicated personal experiences were strongly linked to the intention to continue or discontinue. Women who mentioned recent screening (within three years) and either a spontaneously mentioned cancer story concerning a friend or family member or a doctor's screening recommendation intended to continue screening (91% true positive rate, model sensitivity). Women who did not schedule screening and who did not mention a cancer story or a doctor's recommendation (or neither) intended to discontinue screening (81% true negative rate, model specificity). These experiences transcended differences in race/ethnicity, age, and educational level. Continuation of breast cancer screening in older women is motivated by their personal screening history combined with cancer experiences and/or a doctor's screening recommendation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

了解老年妇女继续或停止乳腺癌筛查的动机。
乳腺癌筛查指南指出,根据患者的健康状况和偏好,75岁以上妇女的筛查是可选的。为了更好地了解老年妇女的偏好和决策,需要将她们对筛查的经历和看法与她们继续或停止筛查的意图联系起来。本研究采用定性比较分析来确定与继续或停止筛查的意图相关的特征和主题。为了捕捉经验和偏好的范围,我们选择了一个有目的的社区居住成年人样本(n = 59),按年龄(70-74岁和75岁及以上)和教育水平(≤12年级和bb0 - 12年级)的白人、黑人和西班牙裔女性的同等代表性。深入的定性访谈探讨了女性对乳房x光检查的看法,筛查的益处和风险,以及个人筛查经历。访谈由两个或更多的编码人员进行编码和质量检查。定性比较分析(QCA)确定了与继续(n = 32)或停止(n = 27)筛查意图相关的个人特征和主题的组合。结果表明,个人经历与继续或停止服用的意愿密切相关。提到最近接受过筛查(三年内)的女性,或者是自发地提到与朋友或家人有关的癌症故事,或者是医生建议继续进行筛查的女性(真阳性率91%,模型敏感性)。没有安排筛查、没有提及癌症故事或医生建议(或两者都没有)的妇女打算停止筛查(81%的真阴性率,模型特异性)。这些经历超越了种族、年龄和教育水平的差异。老年妇女继续进行乳腺癌筛查的动机是她们的个人筛查史、癌症经历和/或医生的筛查建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信